Away we go. J&J ENSEMBLE trial evaluation has landed - 8am again - thanks, FDA! ....1/n fda.gov/advisory-commi…
...First up, yes, outcome measure was reasonably close to what we're used to. Here it is based on the FDA-harmonized definition (including mild disease) - & keep in mind this is with South Africa &c included: vaccine efficacy 67% (CI: 56-75) (CI is a measure of uncertainty)...2/n
...This is what that looks like. Keeping in mind it's a single shot - and 28 days after it is about similar to the time of 7 days after BNT-Pfizer's second shot (as they're 3 weeks apart). (ENSEMBLE-2 is underway to see a 2nd shot on day 57) ...3/n
...Severe/critical Covid-19: there's a cut-off date for determining which were severe (adjudication), so could change a bit. Efficacy: 85.4%
(CI 54 to 97) - less certain for aged 60+, with lower numbers: definitely high efficacy, not sure how high though ...4/n
...Hoping to see more later on how severely ill the people were, why they met those criteria. Here's hospitalization: 0 vaccinated people out of over 19,300 after 28 days. Numbers a bit small here. Range of uncertainty for all who tested positive at all: CI 31 to 100 ...5/n
...A post-hoc (unplanned) analysis, looking at hospitalization for who didn't have signs of a previous infection. The 2 vaccinated people hospitalized within 2 weeks were high risk for severe Covid-19...6/n
...7 people died of Covid-19, all in the placebo group, all at high risk of severe outcomes, all in South Africa. 💔
A reminder of the impact of a variant...7/n
... I think this is the first time this very important outcome has been reported for a Covid-19 vaccine trial: all-cause mortality. Wide CIs, so a lot of uncertainty, but 🤞 ... 8/n
...Asymptomatic infection: pic of caveats, not data, because many. They'll have more data over time. Testing for signs of past infection in blood of people who tested negative before vax. Combined that & PCR testing, efficacy against asymptomatic infection 74%
(CI 47 to 88)...9/n
...Vaccine efficacy against moderate/severe Covid-19 was higher in the US: 72% (CI 58 to 82) than Brazil (68%) or SA (64%): over 80% against severe/critical Covid-19 in all 3 countries ...10/n
...Sequencing isn't complete, so they don't have vaccine efficacy rates for variants yet. No one so far had the B.1.1.7 ("UK") or P.1 ("Brazil") variant, but SA is 67% sequenced & 95% were B.1.351 ("SA" variant)...11/n
Like BNT-Pfizer, they have solicited AEs for the first week for a subset. Moderna had them for the whole trial ...12/n
...Any systemic solicited AE (not injection-related): 55% vax vs 35% placebo; severe <2% vs <1% (that's low). (For Moderna it was 83% vs 53% (bigger injection), 17% severe if previously negative). May be some small under-counting for J&J; FDA said won't make much difference..13/n
...So what were those systemic AEs? Headache, fatigue, myalgia (muscle aches & pains), fever. Severe: Fatigue, myalgia, fever. Rates were higher for younger people (which is so for all of them)...14/n
...Detailed data on duration - I don't think we've had that for any others yet at this level. It was about 2 days. Rates for longer than a week were under 2% & about the same as in the placebo group. On to safety next ...15/n
...Some serious adverse events (SAEs) in people with confounding risk factors, where they could not rule out vaccine involvement: thromboembolic events (clots) & tinnitus (all but one resolving). They considered some cases of hives/swelling as possibly vaccine-related...16/n
...The SAE that resulted in a hold on the trial was a 25-year-old man who had a transverse sinus thrombosis 21 days after vaccine: ultimately determined not to be caused by the vaccine....17/n
...Out of the unsolicited AEs, they considered some (uncommon) likely to be vaccine reactions: arthralgia (joint pain), peripheral neuropathy (numbness or similar in hands/feet); muscle weakness...18/n
...Rate of SAEs similar in vax & placebo groups. FDA judged 3 likely vax-related: 1 allergic reaction (not anaphylaxis); 1 pain from possible injection injury; 1 a severe reaction that resolved in 4 days; plus...19/n
...The FDA couldn't rule out 4 other SAEs, though not likely to be vaccine-related.
There was a reproductive toxicity study (rabbits), which found no problems.
FDA evaluators satisfied on safety & efficacy...20/21
...Single shot, rate of adverse events much lower than mRNAs; high protection from severe Covid-19 & hospitalization; medium-high efficacy against symptomatic disease & possibly asymptomatic; held up against "SA" variant; affordable & low vax costs, non-profit, distributable. /21
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ca 600,000 vaccinated with BNT-Pfizer vaccine in Israel, matched on demographic/clinical characteristics of 600,000 unvaccinated (median age 45) showed results similar to the phase 3 trial... 1/n nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
...Similar pattern, for infection, symptomatic Covid-19, hospitalization, severe disease, death: 10,561 people infected, 57% of them developed symptoms; 369 in hospital, 229 severe Covid-19, 41 deaths...2/n
...7 days after 2nd dose: 92% efficacy against infection (CI: 88 to 95) - that's a strong result. Hospitalization: 87% (CI: 55 to 100) - wide confidence intervals, so not so certain. Remember, it's a group on the young side...3/n
It's another ENSEMBLE-watch day! The FDA meets on 26th to discuss the evaluation of the J&J single-shot vaccine - 3rd vaccine for FDA - & they aim to publish report 2 days ahead, which they achieved for the last 2. So 🤞 all will be revealed in a few hours ... 1/n
...Things I'll be watching out for. By far the biggest set of "events" (people with symptomatic Covid-19) of any trial. So it'll be the strongest data yet on questions past that top line efficacy - efficacy in severe disease, for example, which others had too few to answer ...3/n
Report from Scotland with great news on Covid vaccination reducing hospitalization rates. Not enough data released to be sure about much beyond that though, & number of vaccinated people hospitalized appears to be too small (happily!) to draw much beyond that though...1/2
..Some details about the study hps.scot.nhs.uk/a-to-z-of-topi… BBC says 58 people in hospital who were vaccinated a month before: % by vaccine & for over 80s, but that number seems too small to break it down it by vaccine & age. Overall, ca 90% lower. 🤞 bbc.com/news/health-56… 2/2
This Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine study from a preprint a couple of weeks ago is now published in the Lancet. At first look, there are some additions... 1/n thelancet.com/journals/lance…
...In the original thread, I'd had a question about hospital admissions, but ignore that if you re-read it: the wording is expanded a little in the paper, & it clears it up... 2/n
...The supplementary info includes listing of serious adverse events & unsolicited adverse events, but no data on solicited adverse events - all of that is new...3/n thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S0…
EMA (Euro drug regulator) assessment report for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is online. This one's 181 pages. Most of it's based on the original November data (as in the Lancet publication) but some includes is Ded 7 data (as in recent preprint): ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/h… ...1/n
...They had a major objection to the US manufacturing plant (it's also manufactured in the UK & Belgium - EMA is not assessing Covishield, the Indian version, at all). However, their concerns were resolved. Sounds like it was missing certification...2/n
...EMA wants additional data to validate quality of manufacture at all 3 sites is comparable. Since there's no assessment of Covishield here & WHO didn't do it, I assume this rests totally on the Indian regulator, which published no data (Indian trial still unpublished)...3/n
TGA (Australian drug regulator) issued 2-year provisional approval for the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, no age restrictions, with a cop-out on age - pushing the onus onto individual decisions. 4 to 12 week interval tga.gov.au/media-release/… ...1/n
...The Public Assessment Report released with the decision (49 pages) tga.gov.au/auspar/auspar-… It's for the AstraZeneca version: when CSL (local producer) is ready to supply, that won't need new clinical data... 2/n
...Reproductive safety study in mice is still underway - not recommended for pregnant women before then. Under clinical data, raised issue of follow-up injections possibly decreasing immunity... 3/n