But inmates, regardless of the horrific crimes they commit, are human beings and deserve humane treatment while incarcerated, not torture.
That includes being attacked by other violent prisoners who have no concern for other’s wellbeing. Kinda why some of them are there. No?
This article is so biased it’s painful to read.
There are people who choose violence. The fact they choose violence is often a large part of why they are incarcerated. There is no acknowledgement of that reality in this article.
Some may be harming themselves and some may be incapable of self control and an extreme danger to other inmates. None of that is explored in this article.
Neither is the apparent rationale CSC provided for their inconsistent record keeping.
Or the rationale for CSC top brass offered for not taking responsibility for ensuring records are kept and creating a systematic method of data collection.
It’s just a hit piece on LPC.
Which is a shame.
Inmates are people. Very troubled people to be sure, but still people. The trouble would be why they’re incarcerated. The Justice system does get it right sometimes.
I’m glad people like Paul Bernardo & Michael Rafferty are behind bars. There’s a reason prisons exist.
Inmates are not any less human than the rest of the population, but they are a more difficult subgroup to ensure humane treatment is maintained when acting out violently.
That fact is ignored in this article.
Preference for humane conditions is a shared value by NDP and Liberals. But the problem seems to lie at CSC. Parliament writes policy. It’s bureaucrats who implement policy. That’s called separation of power. A key component to Canadian democracy.
@Justin_Ling may want to brush up on that reality before publishing drivel like this article.
If you’re going to investigate and expose problems, then it may help to investigate fully and know who is responsible for implementation vs policy legislation.
Just sayin’.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Coordinating 10 provinces and 3 territories negotiations to adopt national standards, parameters and to absorb some of the cost in their budgets takes time and willing participants. Public pressure has to be immense. We have 5 provinces toying with private healthcare.
But people need coverage now.
Who is responsible for coverage? Not the feds. It’s provinces. Pharmacare is provincial purview.
Even if feds imposed legislation, there’s this thing called the NOTWITHSTANDING CLAUSE.
What kind of useless comms people take 48 hours to write a lame response? No announcement, just a written statement.
That’s a cop out by an unpopular politician who’s obviously checked what most are opining about the protests.
How many people are focussed on the tiki torches and completely ignore the religious overtones and extremism? The two bigoted views intersect in the TWO protests, not just one.
One protest was at the legislative grounds and downtown Edmonton.
So I dug into this much further since media seems to still be honouring the taboo about challenging the beliefs of those who identify as devoutly faithful.
Note: these beliefs are common in certain church teachings.
This is the central issue with Grace Life Church. The pastors and congregation have decided obeying secular laws interferes with their obedience to god.
Though I struggle to see where god or the bible commands the faithful get to pick and choose which secular laws to follow.
That’s what this showdown is all about. Religious freedom.
Do those claiming fervent religious belief have the freedom to choose which secular (read government legislated) laws they will honour and adhere to?
JCCF says yes, it’s a religious freedom to ignore secular laws.
This woman’s continued employment is an affront to democracy, decency, pluralism and reality. Crafting communications from this perspective is stochastic terrorism.
This is wholly unacceptable and MUST be addressed.
This will not be ignored by the public.
No more hiding behind privacy to protect people who actively promote breaking the law and spread covid disinformation.
If your rhetoric is in support of known insurrectionist violence, you are an insurrectionist in waiting.
O’Toole is protecting an unhinged extremist Christian Nationalist who is inciting STOCHASTIC TERRORISM. This is the same type of rhetoric that inspired the Capitol insurrection attack.
They called Biden a pedophile & accused Pelosi & Schumer of drinking the blood of babies.
Using this type of toxic “Big Lie” rhetoric raises the probability of lone wolf terrorism by far right radicalized extremists to very close to 100%. It’s impossible to predict when or where.
But it will happen if this kind of rhetoric continues to be used. That’s a certainty. Not a probability.
Q’Anon conspiracy theories are overlaying Evangelical Christian Nationalist beliefs about the divine liberty of “true”Christians.