I saw the headline and fell for it hook line and sinker. Then read the article in detail.

What a sham article.

I have no doubt there are problems in Corrections. It’s a difficult population to address needs of inmates appropriately.
But inmates, regardless of the horrific crimes they commit, are human beings and deserve humane treatment while incarcerated, not torture.

That includes being attacked by other violent prisoners who have no concern for other’s wellbeing. Kinda why some of them are there. No?
This article is so biased it’s painful to read.

There are people who choose violence. The fact they choose violence is often a large part of why they are incarcerated. There is no acknowledgement of that reality in this article.
Some may be harming themselves and some may be incapable of self control and an extreme danger to other inmates. None of that is explored in this article.

Neither is the apparent rationale CSC provided for their inconsistent record keeping.
Or the rationale for CSC top brass offered for not taking responsibility for ensuring records are kept and creating a systematic method of data collection.

It’s just a hit piece on LPC.

Which is a shame.
Inmates are people. Very troubled people to be sure, but still people. The trouble would be why they’re incarcerated. The Justice system does get it right sometimes.

I’m glad people like Paul Bernardo & Michael Rafferty are behind bars. There’s a reason prisons exist.
Inmates are not any less human than the rest of the population, but they are a more difficult subgroup to ensure humane treatment is maintained when acting out violently.

That fact is ignored in this article.
Preference for humane conditions is a shared value by NDP and Liberals. But the problem seems to lie at CSC. Parliament writes policy. It’s bureaucrats who implement policy. That’s called separation of power. A key component to Canadian democracy.
@Justin_Ling may want to brush up on that reality before publishing drivel like this article.

If you’re going to investigate and expose problems, then it may help to investigate fully and know who is responsible for implementation vs policy legislation.

Just sayin’.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunshiny

Sunshiny Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunnshiiny

25 Feb
What part of history did Joyce Napier forget to read?

The part where hundreds of thousands of Canadians died or went bankrupt over 50 years in the process of getting universal healthcare.

Change is never immediate when it involves long term fed/prov commitment of funds.
Coordinating 10 provinces and 3 territories negotiations to adopt national standards, parameters and to absorb some of the cost in their budgets takes time and willing participants. Public pressure has to be immense. We have 5 provinces toying with private healthcare.
But people need coverage now.

Who is responsible for coverage? Not the feds. It’s provinces. Pharmacare is provincial purview.

Even if feds imposed legislation, there’s this thing called the NOTWITHSTANDING CLAUSE.
Read 4 tweets
23 Feb
JFC people are gullible & easily gaslit into believing this is actually condemnation of the TWO public protests that took place this weekend.

It’s not. It’s a PR attempt to boost the image of premier persona non grata, and complete obfuscation of what these rallies were about.
The TWO rallies were on Saturday, during the day.

What kind of useless comms people take 48 hours to write a lame response? No announcement, just a written statement.

That’s a cop out by an unpopular politician who’s obviously checked what most are opining about the protests.
How many people are focussed on the tiki torches and completely ignore the religious overtones and extremism? The two bigoted views intersect in the TWO protests, not just one.

One protest was at the legislative grounds and downtown Edmonton.
Read 21 tweets
22 Feb
So I dug into this much further since media seems to still be honouring the taboo about challenging the beliefs of those who identify as devoutly faithful.

Note: these beliefs are common in certain church teachings.
This is the central issue with Grace Life Church. The pastors and congregation have decided obeying secular laws interferes with their obedience to god.

Though I struggle to see where god or the bible commands the faithful get to pick and choose which secular laws to follow.
That’s what this showdown is all about. Religious freedom.

Do those claiming fervent religious belief have the freedom to choose which secular (read government legislated) laws they will honour and adhere to?

JCCF says yes, it’s a religious freedom to ignore secular laws.
Read 42 tweets
21 Feb
This woman’s continued employment is an affront to democracy, decency, pluralism and reality. Crafting communications from this perspective is stochastic terrorism.

This is wholly unacceptable and MUST be addressed.

This will not be ignored by the public.
No more hiding behind privacy to protect people who actively promote breaking the law and spread covid disinformation.

If your rhetoric is in support of known insurrectionist violence, you are an insurrectionist in waiting.
Read 14 tweets
21 Feb
O’Toole is protecting an unhinged extremist Christian Nationalist who is inciting STOCHASTIC TERRORISM. This is the same type of rhetoric that inspired the Capitol insurrection attack.

They called Biden a pedophile & accused Pelosi & Schumer of drinking the blood of babies.
She also accuses PMJT of fixing the election.

This is how stochastic terrorism works.

Using this type of toxic “Big Lie” rhetoric raises the probability of lone wolf terrorism by far right radicalized extremists to very close to 100%. It’s impossible to predict when or where.
But it will happen if this kind of rhetoric continues to be used. That’s a certainty. Not a probability.

Q’Anon conspiracy theories are overlaying Evangelical Christian Nationalist beliefs about the divine liberty of “true”Christians.
Read 40 tweets
19 Feb
Allowing this to be propagated as is without clarification is irresponsible.

CERB was a wage replacement for employed citizens.

GST credits are federal tax rebates.

Child bonuses were an attempt to provide additional social benefits to those with children.
Carbon Tax is in response to a global (never mind national) existential threat.

Only one is an infringement on provincial purview. And is meant to supplement provincial benefits already available.

The remainder are federal purview.
Several provinces have taken the feds to court over imposing a national tax. Because they refute the federal purview to impose a tax.

Not for any concern for citizens, but to protect large corporations who are actually the target of carbon levies.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!