How bitcoin is different from gold.

(a tiny thread)
1/ The most important bit is that gold outcompeted preexisting currencies as a medium of exchange.

Before gold, people used shells, salt etc.

Gold was unique because it was non- consumable and infinitely divisible.

Not many existing currencies shared that.
2/ Unlike bitcoin, gold properties wasn’t adopted because it was theorised to be better.

Its superiority was discovered gradually through market transactions, not through white papers or theoretical arguments.
3/ Gold worked pretty well as a medium of exchange and ONLY then started getting used as a store of value.

Bitcoin is trying to do reverse, which looks difficult.
4/ Gold’s appeal as a store of value came from ornamental use.

People want to show off gold as a measure of their wealth. Status seeking is the most fundamental drive we humans have.

With bitcoin, anyone can claim to hold a public address with lots of bitcoins.
5/ Gold transactions need to be verified by the people who conduct it - they exchange physical atoms.

Bitcoin transactions need to be verified by the entire network. In that sense, you don’t own bitcoins - you license them.
6/ Gold can be confiscated or stolen since you own it.

Bitcoin can’t be stolen since you don’t own it in the first place (see previous tweet).
7/ That’s it!

What other important difference between these two did I miss?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paras Chopra

Paras Chopra Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @paraschopra

22 Feb
A short thread on Venture Capital.
1/ VCs are a portfolio of uncorrelated, risky bets that entrepreneurs take.
2/ Essentially VCs underwrite business risk - they let entrepreneurs take the risk that has a small chance exceptional returns.
Read 9 tweets
22 Feb
Deliver value only on dimensions that customers care about.

(a thread on this mental model)

🎉 It's also 11th chapter of my book invertedpassion.com/deliver-value-…
1/ Most markets are like the car market.

Some people like bigger cars, others like efficient cars and then there are some who like premium cars.

That is, markets aren’t homogeneous. They consist of different sets of people who value different aspects in a solution.
2/ Because different segments value different aspects, an improvement in one aspect will only be appreciated by that segment and get ignored by everyone else in the market.
Read 17 tweets
20 Feb
How to make sense of negative interest rates.

(a short thread)
1/ In many developed nations such as Switzerland, interest rates have been negative for many years now.

This means you pay the bank to hold cash. How does that make sense?

cnn.com/2020/01/23/inv…
2/ The key is that this is happening in most developed nations.

In these nations, investable opportunities are going down because practically their economies - roads, industries and so on - are built out.

Imagine you have money but nowhere profitable to invest. What happens?
Read 10 tweets
15 Feb
All sophisticated solutions start extremely simple

(a thread on this mental model)

📕 It's also 10th chapter of my book invertedpassion.com/all-sophistica…
1/ There’s always a temptation to launch a fully built product with more features and capabilities than existing competitors.

It’s exciting to build the next Google, the next iPhone or the next SpaceX, isn’t it?
2/ This temptation is dangerous because even the most successful products in a market had simple beginnings.

No product arrives in the market fully fleshed out.
Read 23 tweets
13 Feb
Since many folks are tagging me on this thread, here’s what I think about it.

1/ The argument isn’t that bitcoin is entirely useless, the argument is that cost-benefit tradeoff for it is *worse* than current systems such as banking or the Visa network
2/ Comparing bitcoin’s energy consumption with Gold mining is a false comparison.

Once gold is mined, it exists forever. If gold mining stops today, no additional energy will be consumed but gold transactions will still keep happening.
3/ If bitcoin mining stops today, no transactions can take place.

So the bitcoin mining has to keep happening forever for bitcoin transactions to occur.
Read 5 tweets
12 Feb
Bitcoin is a virtual fortress.

(a short thread)
1/ I’ve started imagining bitcoin as a virtual fortress which is secured mathematically so that even governments cannot seize it.
2/ There’s a price to pay to enter into this fortress but since there are limited entry tickets, if more people want to enter into it, the price keeps on going up.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!