π¨πͺπΊπ¬π§ππ₯ππ¦π£ππ¬π§πͺπΊπ¨So. As EU mulls legal sanctions v U.K. over handling of Northern Ireland Protocol today, biz groups that have already lost millions from #brexit urge @DavidGHFrost to cool the βmadmanβ strategy - stay with me. /1 on.ft.com/3qu9806
@DavidGHFrost This isn't a black and white story, since mistakes have been committed by both sides in the handling of the NI Protocol, but last week's decision to unilaterally extend grace periods by Frost has got right up EU noses - even IF, as UK protests, @michaelgove was planning same /2
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove The problem here is that Frost has 'form' with the EU. Back in 2019 and in 2020 in negotiations on the Protocol and the TCA, he was often seen as deliberately confrontational - part of the Vote Leave 'madman' strategy to get a decent deal. /3
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove So that means that the EU, frankly, reads the worst possible intentions into every Frost move (when Gove and Sefcovic) had a working relationship.
So the fact that Frost did not notify @MarosSefcovic about the unilateral move has put noses out of joint in Brussels/capitals/4
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove@MarosSefcovic The UK protests that the EU was being too slow to move to avoid shortages and extend grace period on requiring full export health documentation - and was supported by NI biz groups leaders like @MichaelAodhan@ManufacturingNI - and so had no choice but to move /5
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove@MarosSefcovic@MichaelAodhan@ManufacturingNI But the manner of the move - ignoring @simoncoveney entreaties, not notifying Sefcovic - and then following it up with an OpEd in Sunday Telegraph that was headlined as an warning to EU to "stop sulking" just questions whether UK really does want to implement Protocol /6
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove@MarosSefcovic@MichaelAodhan@ManufacturingNI@simoncoveney The EU says it does understand the need for flexibility (though the Brits haven't seen much) but equally, as one EU diplomat says, EU countries "are sovereign as well and do not want to be stage hands in the narrative Frosts spins domestically". Hence the coming legal action /7
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove@MarosSefcovic@MichaelAodhan@ManufacturingNI@simoncoveney The real problem here is trust - the EU doesn't trust that the UK intends to implement the Protocol and it doesn't want temporary easements (on say allowing sausages to enter NI unfrozen) to become permanent solutions. So its laying down a marker /8
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove@MarosSefcovic@MichaelAodhan@ManufacturingNI@simoncoveney The UK argument that the risk to the single market is currently zero (since UK remains de facto aligned with EU rules, even if not legally) doesn't was in Brussels, where the question is what happens if/when UK does diverge and broken system is in place /9
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove@MarosSefcovic@MichaelAodhan@ManufacturingNI@simoncoveney All of this brouhaha is deeply unsettling to UK businesses who want practical solutions and are worried that their interests are going to become pawns in a perpetual game of Borisian Brussels-baiting to obscure the costs of the new trading arrangements./10
βAdopting a βmadmanβ negotiating strategy might be great politics, but itβs terrible for food supply chains. The next few months are make or break for the food industry." he says. /12
It will could it's point of principle but - as last time with Internal Market Bill - use the legal process to create space to arrive at mutually agreeable fixes.
The mixing of real-world UK trade interests (45% of which is with EU) with previously cost-free Brussels-bashing instincts risks only deepening the costs of Brexit. Time for calm. ENDS
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
π¨πͺπΊπ¬π§ππ«π₯§ππͺππͺπΊπ¬π§π¨From April 21 the EU is introducing new rules on composite foods (pizza, chocolate, crisps etc) that are going to pile new red tape on U.K. food manufacturers/1
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden So what fresh hell is this? Well, the EU has a new regulation coming into force on composite foods - 2020/2235 - which will require 'third countries' (which the UK now is, after #Brexit) to do a lot more form-filling at Β£m's to industry /2
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden The new rules mean that so-called "shelf-stable" products that contain meat (a pepperoni pizza) or pasteurised milk (a choc bar or a curry sauce with yoghurt in it) will require a vet-stamped Export Health Certificate.../3
AS EU mulls legal action against UK on Northern Irish Protocol - @Jacob_Rees_Mogg tells @ConHome podcast that UK does have "selfish interest" in Northern Ireland - and explains UK position on protocol - listen from 9m30s. Potentially provocative. Why? /1
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@ConHome Well that phrase "no selfish strategic or economic interest" was used by Thatcher's NI Secretary Peter Brooke as a key signal to Republicans in the gestation of the Good Friday Agreement - see account here /2
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@ConHome It underpins the notion of "rigorous impartiality" that the UK Secretary of State has to both communities in Northern Ireland - a notion that #Brexit has always made problematic. More on that here /3
@FinancialTimes This is one of those post-#brexit bellwether stories because it points to the reality of what 'taking back control' means.
So yes, we have control, but that means, as @DavidHenigUK tells me, government has to decide between domestic pressure groups. It can't blame Brussels /2
@FinancialTimes@DavidHenigUK IN this case, that means @DefraGovUK@beisgovuk choosing between the chemical industry lobby and the environmental/health lobbies over how to build the UK's new 'sovereign' chemicals regulatory regime. Sounds techy, it is, but chemicals are in EVERYTHING, so it matters /3
Interesting test of UK-EU relations coming up shortly, as the UK government unilaterally grants itself more time to adjust to 'Irish Sea border' controls (export health certificates etc) for GB 'exporters' from April 1 to "at least" Oct 1st /1
On the downside, this move is 'unilateral' - i.e it wasn't agreed in the Joint Committee , which risks being seen as breach of good faith.
On the upside the @DefraGovUK email to stakeholders still talks about "phased" implementation of the certificates. So not walking away./2
@DefraGovUK Indeed that advice says that the Govt continues to urge all traders to "accelerate their readiness preparations"....so which speaks to the UK govt's official acceptance of the need to implement the NI Protocol /3
@FinancialTimes So the short story is UK has cut emissions by more than 70 per cent since 1990 (thanks to windmill bonanza + shuttering coal power stations) BUT that means that for a lot of consumers the greening has come largely unnoticed. That's about to change. /2
@FinancialTimes As Chris Stark @ChiefExecCCC tells me, the next leg of the 'net zero' journey is going to mean change for consumers. It'll not be enough to admire Greta Thunberg, it'll mean consumer changes in a) transport, mostly electric cars b) way we heat our (elderly) housing stock /3
@FinancialTimes This is a story that impacts both workers, consumers and the travel industry itself - something that the UK is very good at.
@ABTAtravel estimates 20,000 workers are directly involved in servicing holidays in the EU - but there are more in UK reliant on sales /2
@FinancialTimes@ABTAtravel The big problem is that the UK government was so keen to end free movement that it didn't either a bilateral visa waiver agreement or a list of so-called βpaid activity exceptionsβ that could have included travel industry workers who work as tour reps etc /3