π¨πͺπΊπ¬π§ππ«π₯§ππͺππͺπΊπ¬π§π¨From April 21 the EU is introducing new rules on composite foods (pizza, chocolate, crisps etc) that are going to pile new red tape on U.K. food manufacturers/1
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden So what fresh hell is this? Well, the EU has a new regulation coming into force on composite foods - 2020/2235 - which will require 'third countries' (which the UK now is, after #Brexit) to do a lot more form-filling at Β£m's to industry /2
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden The new rules mean that so-called "shelf-stable" products that contain meat (a pepperoni pizza) or pasteurised milk (a choc bar or a curry sauce with yoghurt in it) will require a vet-stamped Export Health Certificate.../3
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden Other 'composite' products will require "attestations" from industry saying where the plant/animal products contained therein come from...so a maker of cheese in onion crisps will, per @Foodanddrinkfed wonks, need to 'attest' where the cheese in the cheese powder came from /4
@FinancialTimes@mroliverbarnes@jimbrunsden@Foodanddrinkfed Of course cheese might have come from multiple dairies and different batches of powder will be used in different batches of crisps....but they'll need have the "attestations" to show provenance/traceability /5
Taking each in turn, the vets is both a cost and a capacity issue.
For now feared shortages haven't arisen since lot of trade has stopped, though "pinch-points have" but these new checks will test capacity - and have potential knock on impacts for other parts of industry/8
Foz biz it's cost. As one snack company tells @Foodanddrinkfed:βWe will need a vet on site for 10 hours per day, five days a week at a cost of Β£300,000 per annum. Multiply this across our sites where we export and we are looking at a potential cost running into the millions."/9
@Foodanddrinkfed For the Β£13.5bn chilled food industry, that employs 80,000 people about 5%-8%, per @ChilledFood Assoc is Ireland-related and a lot of that trade is unviable with this level of paperwork, per @KaarinGoodburn - the margins, the delays at border pre-notifying etc /10
an Wright of @Foodanddrinkfed warns, unless checks are "proportionate" a lot of his members will find shipping to NI uneconomic /11
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn If you want to get a sense of an 'attestation form'...take a look at this. Page 402 onwards gives you a sense of what's needed. It's a bit of a head-scrambler and needless to say other 'third countries' aren't relishing the prospects /12
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn One big help *might* be to try and get pasteurised milk included in the list of 'shelf stable' product input that would NOT require a full EHC (stamped by a vet) but just an attestation. This would slim down the volumes of new EHCS.../13
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn At the moment the regs seem to say that only dairy products that have undergone specific 'risk mitigating' treatments escape need for EHCs - see note 10 , (Annex V, p405) here: /14
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn The rubric that notes refers to is here (this is what the policy wonks at @Foodanddrinkfed now have to get into) and it doesn't appear to include pasteurised milk. So every chocolate bar with a 'glass n a half' etc is captured /15
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn I understand that the government is trying to get clarity on this, since it would help smooth thinks along, but worth noting that none of the EU-UK trade deal (TCA) supervisory committees are operating, so not clear how much help anyone's going to get/16
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn Of course, these new regs will fall on all third countries, but the reality is they are not doing the kind of intense, just-in-time trade that the UK does with the EU. So we're mapping processes designed for long-sea trade onto fast-flowing pipe of UK-EU trade/17
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn One other unanswered question is whether the UK will put similar requirements on EU exports into the UK (tit for tat) and even whether the UK has the will/capacity to enforce such rules.
Of course masses of this could be alleviated by SPS alignment/Vet agreements etc /18
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn For now, it may well just be that some parts of some businesses for some UK food producers are just collateral damage in the #Brexit process, which is bad luck for them. Whether it creates localised job losses/pinch-points in certain areas tbc /19
@Foodanddrinkfed@ChilledFood@KaarinGoodburn It does seem kind of self-defeating on both sides, and perhaps in time things will calm down a bit - but for now, sharpen your pencils, break out the wet stamps, there's more #Brexit bureaucracy on the way. ENDS
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
AS EU mulls legal action against UK on Northern Irish Protocol - @Jacob_Rees_Mogg tells @ConHome podcast that UK does have "selfish interest" in Northern Ireland - and explains UK position on protocol - listen from 9m30s. Potentially provocative. Why? /1
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@ConHome Well that phrase "no selfish strategic or economic interest" was used by Thatcher's NI Secretary Peter Brooke as a key signal to Republicans in the gestation of the Good Friday Agreement - see account here /2
@Jacob_Rees_Mogg@ConHome It underpins the notion of "rigorous impartiality" that the UK Secretary of State has to both communities in Northern Ireland - a notion that #Brexit has always made problematic. More on that here /3
π¨πͺπΊπ¬π§ππ₯ππ¦π£ππ¬π§πͺπΊπ¨So. As EU mulls legal sanctions v U.K. over handling of Northern Ireland Protocol today, biz groups that have already lost millions from #brexit urge @DavidGHFrost to cool the βmadmanβ strategy - stay with me. /1 on.ft.com/3qu9806
@DavidGHFrost This isn't a black and white story, since mistakes have been committed by both sides in the handling of the NI Protocol, but last week's decision to unilaterally extend grace periods by Frost has got right up EU noses - even IF, as UK protests, @michaelgove was planning same /2
@DavidGHFrost@michaelgove The problem here is that Frost has 'form' with the EU. Back in 2019 and in 2020 in negotiations on the Protocol and the TCA, he was often seen as deliberately confrontational - part of the Vote Leave 'madman' strategy to get a decent deal. /3
@FinancialTimes This is one of those post-#brexit bellwether stories because it points to the reality of what 'taking back control' means.
So yes, we have control, but that means, as @DavidHenigUK tells me, government has to decide between domestic pressure groups. It can't blame Brussels /2
@FinancialTimes@DavidHenigUK IN this case, that means @DefraGovUK@beisgovuk choosing between the chemical industry lobby and the environmental/health lobbies over how to build the UK's new 'sovereign' chemicals regulatory regime. Sounds techy, it is, but chemicals are in EVERYTHING, so it matters /3
Interesting test of UK-EU relations coming up shortly, as the UK government unilaterally grants itself more time to adjust to 'Irish Sea border' controls (export health certificates etc) for GB 'exporters' from April 1 to "at least" Oct 1st /1
On the downside, this move is 'unilateral' - i.e it wasn't agreed in the Joint Committee , which risks being seen as breach of good faith.
On the upside the @DefraGovUK email to stakeholders still talks about "phased" implementation of the certificates. So not walking away./2
@DefraGovUK Indeed that advice says that the Govt continues to urge all traders to "accelerate their readiness preparations"....so which speaks to the UK govt's official acceptance of the need to implement the NI Protocol /3
@FinancialTimes So the short story is UK has cut emissions by more than 70 per cent since 1990 (thanks to windmill bonanza + shuttering coal power stations) BUT that means that for a lot of consumers the greening has come largely unnoticed. That's about to change. /2
@FinancialTimes As Chris Stark @ChiefExecCCC tells me, the next leg of the 'net zero' journey is going to mean change for consumers. It'll not be enough to admire Greta Thunberg, it'll mean consumer changes in a) transport, mostly electric cars b) way we heat our (elderly) housing stock /3
@FinancialTimes This is a story that impacts both workers, consumers and the travel industry itself - something that the UK is very good at.
@ABTAtravel estimates 20,000 workers are directly involved in servicing holidays in the EU - but there are more in UK reliant on sales /2
@FinancialTimes@ABTAtravel The big problem is that the UK government was so keen to end free movement that it didn't either a bilateral visa waiver agreement or a list of so-called βpaid activity exceptionsβ that could have included travel industry workers who work as tour reps etc /3