Clinical trials in patients with hematological malignancies often present unique challenges for trial design due to complexity of tmt options and existence of potential curative but highly risky procedures, for example, SCT or tmt sequence across different phases.
The paper illustrates how to apply the estimand framework in hematological clinical trials and how the estimand framework can address...
3/n
... potential difficulties in trial result interpretation. Three phase 3 RCTs are used to illustrate different scientific questions and the consequences of the estimand choice for
- trial design,
- data collection,
- analysis,
- and interpretation.
4/n
Template language for describing estimands in study protocols and statistical analysis plans is suggested in the paper’s appendix.
This paper is another result of the X-industry working group "estimands in oncology" (oncoestimand.org)
I give a list of activities that were kicked off by the ICH E9 estimands addendum (I believe) and that I am aware of (and/or involved in). I am sure there is much more, so no ambition at all to be comprehensive.
Very interesting paper on carbon footprint of pharma industry. Some takeaways:
1) Pharma significantly *more* emission intensive than automotive industry.
2) Highest and lowest intensity emitter in 2015 differ by factor of 5.5!
2/3
3) From 2012-2015 "...the leader of the pack,
namely @Roche, achieved both highest increase in revenues as well as highest reduction in emissions, suggesting, albeit on anecdotal basis, that financial and environmental performances are far from being exclusive."
3/3
4) Roche, J&J, and Amgen are already today below the 2025 target emission according to the Paris climate agreement.
There are many reasons to work for Roche, but this is definitively one more, and not the least important for me!
1/n I was asked to give an industry statistician's view on A) below. Disclaimer: I do not know about the exact regulations (which might also be region-specific). What I offer is a 1st hand experience of what happens around a trial stopping early. A thread.
Planned efficacy interim after ~245 PFS events. 1) Data with sponsor, except for tmt assignment (=rando codes). 2) Rando codes with IxRS vendor. 3) Indep. Stat. Reporting Group (ISRG) coordinates.
Registration still open for EFSPI regulatory statistics webinars. Currently we have 627 and 534 registrations for the two webinars. Webex can handle 1000 people dialing in, so go ahead and register! 😉