It's the 1 year anniversary of the first reported death from Covid-19 in Sweden. 23 new deaths reported today, and a further 5300 new confirmed infections.
This is a dramatically higher death toll than our Nordic neighbours, who chose a suppression strategy - get cases down as much as possible - as opposed to Sweden's mitigation strategy - get cases down enough so that healthcare is not overwhelmed.
At the peaks of Wave 1 and Wave 2, Sweden was experiencing around 100 deaths/day from Covid-19. We continue to have around 20-30 deaths a day.
None of our Nordic neighbours have come even close to this level.
(note: Swedish data here is based on reporting day, not day of death, hence the jumpiness)
Sweden continues to report around 4000 new confirmed infections a day. There are some signs this is starting to plateau thanks to the increased restrictions and improved weather.
Apart from the first week or two of the pandemic, Sweden did little testing until wave 2 took off following the summer break. Denmark in particular took a dramatically different approach - following the advice of WHO to test test test!
Massive amounts of testing allows Denmark to quickly see an outbreak was occurring, and quickly react by implementing restrictions, reflected in the steepness of the curves in the number of cases detected.
At the beginning of the pandemic, The UK announced they would try to stop the pandemic with the help of "herd immunity". Swedish State Epidemiologist and chief architect of the Swedish response, Dr Anders Tegnell, agreed.
Indeed, a few days earlier, he had written to colleagues suggesting keeping schools open would help reach herd immunity earlier.
March 16 2020, Anders Tegnell responded to Dr Peet Tüll, one of his predecessors as State Epidemiologist, confirming that the Public Health Authority and chosen to pursue Herd Immunity as the strategy.
The world takes notice of the different approach Sweden is taking to the pandemic. @DrEmmaFrans explains the strategy isn't to stop the spread of the virus, just to slow it down so healthcare isn't overwhelmed.
In the following months, Swedish authorities were clearly pinning their hopes on the population being protected from a 2nd wave of the pandemic through widespread immunity.
This belief assumed that the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for the SARS-CoV-2 was actually much lower than the 0.3% to 1% rate earlier calculated by WHO and other scientists.
Senior advisor to the Swedish Public Health Authority, and former State Epidemiologist Johan Giesecke said on April 17 he believes the IFR to be about 0.1% - a "bad flu". He predicts the Swedish death toll to be between 1000 and 2000.
On the day of that interview, the Swedish Public Health Authority reported there had already been a total of 1400 deaths, later updates took it to 1838.
The day before, on April 16, Anders Tegnell, told Norwegian Media that he expected Stockholm to hit herd immunity at the end of May. nrk.no/urix/tegnell_-…
April 23, Swedish Deputy State Epidemiologist explains that a lockdown would slow the spread of the virus too much.
A few weeks later, in response by calculations by mathematician Tom Britton, Tegnell admits a death toll of 8000 to 20000 is possible, if Sweden doesn't protect the elderly.
Today, a year since the first death, Stockholm is in the middle of a third wave of infections, averaging nearly 1000 new cases a day, and increasing.
As cases began to soar at the end of October, Anders Tegnell amazingly tells German media Die Zeit that pursuit of herd immunity without a vaccine is not only futile, but would be immoral.
And while mortality may be decreasing thanks to the brilliant work of vaccine scientists, we are again seeing more and more Swedes admitted to hospital with Covid-19. In January, I was one of them.
Over 42,000 Swedes have been hospitalised due to this pandemic, nearly 4500 of them admitted to Intensive Care. More than 11% of those hospitalised have died.
Many thousands more have died outside of hospital. The wave 2 that was not supposed to come, that we would be protected from? It's been bigger and more deadly than wave 1.
In December, an independent Corona Commission released their first report. They pointed out that the high death toll in Sweden was due to a failure to protect the elderly.
What they also said, but media and Government chose to ignore?
"We find it most likely that the single most important factor behind the major outbreaks and the high number of deaths in residential care is the overall spread of the virus in the society"
Over 13000 dead. More than 40000 hospitalisations. Over 700000 confirmed cases, and likely closer to 1.5 million infected, potentially more than 100000 people suffering from long-term health damage.
This is the legacy of the Swedish Coronavirus Strategy.
A brief update. 46 new #covid19sverige deaths and nearly 6000 new cases reported today, taking the total reported FHM death toll to 13088. All but 2 deaths are from the last 2 weeks. With lag considered, we are likely experiencing around 20-30 deaths/day at present.
With lag considered, we are likely experiencing between 20-30 deaths/day at present.
Nationally we're averaging approximately 4000 new cases per day.
34 new #covid19sverige deaths reported today, taking the total to 13042. There are 34 deaths with no date of death recorded. These deaths were spread fairly evening over the past 2 weeks, with only 2 deaths recorded earlier.
Now that the data is more or less complete, a slowdown in the rate of new deaths is clearly apparent from approx mid-Jan in the cumulative deaths data. This is approx 3 weeks after harder restrictions were put in place.
This is also clear on the 7 day average of mortality, with deaths declining significantly from Jan 14. While the last 2-3 weeks data remains incomplete, a clear slowing in the rate of decline is already apparent from approx Feb 14.
Prof Jonas @Ludvigsson yesterday posted a response to questions about why he signed the Great Barrington Declaration. I hope he doesn't mind but I've translated it in to English for those interested, followed by some comments.
First, I disagree with Prof Ludvigsson about "lockdowns", however you define them, not being useful unless implemented early. Stricter restrictions have led to significant declines in cases in country after country.
#covid19sverige update, Swedish media anti-oroa special edition.
58 new deaths reported today (138 on tuesday and 44 yesterday) taking the death toll to 12428.
Changes this week as far back as Nov 22 (moved to next day), but the majority of additions are in the past 2wks.
Growth in cumulative deaths continues to slow, reflecting a decrease in daily mortality
7 day rolling average mortality I've removed all updates from 2020 to simplify as Excel was complaining about it! Deaths averaging 90 or above from Dec 20 through now to Jan 15, down from a Christmas high of 99.
Right, back to things that matter rather than petty attacks on citizen activists who disagree with the accepted narrative.
There's a pandemic occurring and B117 and other variants on the rampage in Sweden. Why am I optimistic?
First, let's look at this graph.
The outbreak began in Sweden in the beginning of March, and about 3 weeks later the deaths started to mount up, increasing rapidly until mid-April when they began a long, slow decline.
The decline was slower than anywhere else in Europe, but nevertheless a decline.
The question is - why? The obvious answer is that at the end of March, the Swedish government issued various recommendations on physical distancing, working from home etc.
Without mentioning any names, about a week ago a member of "the 22" contacted me and said they were under attack by a Swedish journalist, the same one behind today's SR Ekot article.
The journalist was claiming they'd made a false statement about something Tegnell said back in May and they was asking for my assistance in providing proper sources for what was said. I was happy to oblige. Tegnell *had* said it, I had the sources, the journalist was wrong.
I've since learned that the same journalist criticised "the 22" last year, claiming they had falsified some numbers in a report. The Swedish Press and Broadcasting Authority called them out for it.