A thread on liquidity blackholes and Fuse from @RariCapital

I don’t think you understand what’s coming
$RGT #Fuse
It is my belief that crypto enables easy direct asset ownership, in which you custody and control your own assets, but that that is unlikely to be commonplace as things play out
By that, I don’t mean we’re all going to have centralized custodians for our assets. At least I hope not. I think self-custody is here to stay, and will ultimately be even safer and more user friendly than banks and financial institutions
What I mean is we’re not all going to hold actual assets. The biggest innovation (imo) from DeFi has been composability: the ability to wrap a productive asset into a different claim asset that we can treat as having the same value
Instead of holding ETH, I can hold REPT and earn yield while maintaining the same exposure. If that’s the case, why would I ever want ETH? Especially if I can transact with and use REPT the same as ETH; there’s now much less reason to hold the base asset
That’s where liquidity blackholes step in. I believe the vast majority of base assets will only exist on the protocol level. On the user level, you’ll transact with a yielding claim asset maintaining the underlying exposure of your chosen base asset.
Asset ownership will be abstracted away into productive claims. Blackhole protocols will suck assets in for their internal use and rarely, if ever, let them go
I think Fuse kicks this up a notch. What if you could maintain your exposure but get yield from any asset? You choose to hold a yielding ETH token, but behind the scenes your ETH is being used to borrow and lend DAI for a greater net yield. What if you could do this with an NFT?
The potential capital efficiency here is massive. You may think this is a bad thing, but I think this could end the days of 10%+ base DeFi APY. Those safe APYs only exist from a lack of capital for a particular asset in a particular strategy. But what if any asset would suffice?
I’ll note that this would likely be preceded by the opposite effect, in which higher borrowing demand for common assets, and more lending supply for uncommon assets, would push common yields up in the short term.
But the long term view stands: interoperable, asset-agnostic, permissionless money markets are the path to capital efficiency for a global digital economy
I remember @jai_bhavnani telling me about this idea months ago. I thought it would revolutionize the space…if it was possible. But I wasn’t sure if it was; it sounded too good to be true! Luckily he's been able to prove me wrong
And now I am incredibly excited for Fuse to launch. I don’t know when, but I do know that it will fundamentally alter the way that this industry functions. This will be one of the first blackholes to start consuming and abstracting away asset ownership
I could go on about how this links into our own treasury blackhole, but I won’t. I think there’s enough to think about without piling on more…right now. But you should definitely be paying attention to @RariCapital right now. If you aren’t, you’re probably ngmi

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zeus Ω (3, 3)

Zeus Ω (3, 3) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ohmzeus

7 Jun
Unpopular opinion: Bitcoin falling from #1 would be one of the most bullish things to ever happen to crypto
“But ser,” the threatened maxi says, “Bitcoin falling from #1 would mean Lindy isn’t a thing. That means nothing can hold value.”
Well ser, what about the revolutionary thought that valuable things will hold value, and non valuable things won’t?
Read 17 tweets
4 Jun
Ready to build ser

The upcoming OHM x FRAX partnership is a big one. I hope you’re paying attention anon

Find out why
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
For those unfamiliar with Olympus or Frax, they’re actually quite similar protocols

Both have a protocol treasury acting as a massive whale. That treasury influences the market through market operations to manifest desirable behavior
In the case of Olympus, that behavior is currently to feed the treasury with assets and liquidity.

In the case of Frax, that behavior is a stable peg at $1.

Frax cares about price and less about backing. Olympus cares about backing and less about price.
Read 18 tweets
26 May
-/x

I think the crux of the issue here is that no non-sovereign blockchain assets have shown any potential to actually replace stablecoins

A thread on what I mean by this
Tl;dr

- Non sovereign currency narrative is dying because existing attempts have failed
- They've failed because they don't try
- A non-sovereign currency needs a non-sovereign central bank
- A currency with a decentralized bank has the best chance of replacing stablecoins
1/x

Bitcoin has been around for over 12 years now. During that time, it has gone from a super volatile, super well-performing asset to...a slightly-less volatile, still well-performing asset

The same can be said for ETH 6 years in
Read 20 tweets
20 Apr
1/21 - Stability and growth through bonds:

How they're designed, how they've worked so far, and the role of reserve vs liquidity bonds

A 🧵👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
2/21 - Bonds have become the cornerstone of Olympus

Today they are our primary treasury accumulation mechanism; and, with the passage of a recent proposal, they're slated to remain in that role
scattershot.page/#/olympusdao.e…
3/21 - But there was actually a time when bonds weren't in the picture at all

The initial design here centered solely on a sales contract, which would sell and buy directly to/from users
Read 21 tweets
8 Apr
Bonds are probably the hardest piece of @OlympusDAO to understand. But they're also one of the most important, and sometimes the most lucrative.

A thread on what bonds are, how they fit into the big picture, and how they're going

👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
Bonds are the treasury's way of capturing liquidity. They give users the ability to trade SLP tokens for $OHM directly with the protocol.

Our website displays the bond price in DAI for you, because it's effectively a trade at that price
When you make the trade, you're put on a vesting schedule. Over the course of 15 epochs (5 days), the $OHM you bought becomes redeemable.

You're incentivized to bond by a discount. The discount increases and decreases along with debt outstanding (more bonds = lower discount)
Read 15 tweets
4 Apr
1/20 - A thread🧵on Protocol Controlled Value

New protocols are being built that can never die.
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
2/20 - The first generation of algorithmic stablecoins were solely centered around incentive and mechanism design.

Starting with AMPL and the rebase, the concept of elastic supply blossomed into an entire sub-genre of DeFi
3/20 - Mechanisms and incentives are an important part of the success of any token, but algos especially. Certain behaviors need to be rewarded, and some behaviors even punished, to manifest the desired behavior of the system
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(