The Hindu disease of one sided tolerance towards turushka danavas is nothing new. Great freedom fighter & founder of Bharatiya vidhya bhavan KM Munshi writes in the foreword of the book titled " The struggle for empire" which details the turushka invasion of Bharat in detail (1)
He writes "Indian kings, steeped in their tradition of tolerance, could
scarcely envisage the danger to which their policies towards Isl@m
exposed them. In spite of what was happening in North India, Indian
kings permitted foreigners to settle freely in their kingdoms..cont.. (2)
scarcely envisage the danger to which their policies towards Isl@m
exposed them. In spite of what was happening in North India, Indian
kings permitted foreigners to settle freely in their kingdoms..cont.. (2)
... and granted them free exercise of their religious practices. Even before
the Turkic invasion, some sects of isl@m had drifted into the country
and their religious and proselytising activities had not been interfered with...cont... (3)
the Turkic invasion, some sects of isl@m had drifted into the country
and their religious and proselytising activities had not been interfered with...cont... (3)
.. Jayasimha Siddharaja of Gujarat (1094-1143CE) punished some of his subjects for interfering with the worship of mµslims. Proselytising activities were freely carried out in the days of the Yadavas by a sufi, mumin arif, who settled near Devagiri in the South..cont.. (4)
... Sarangadeva (1294-1297)
of Gujarat gave a grant for a masjid to the local mµslim community
of Prabhasa Pattana with the blessings of the high-priest of Somanatha when, for decades, the turks had been destroying thousands of temples in Varanasi and other sacred places... (5)
of Gujarat gave a grant for a masjid to the local mµslim community
of Prabhasa Pattana with the blessings of the high-priest of Somanatha when, for decades, the turks had been destroying thousands of temples in Varanasi and other sacred places... (5)
.. Once the turkish sultanate was installed at Delhi & isl@m
came to be enthroned in political power, wherever the writ of the
Sultans ran, the proselytising activities of isl@m became active.. (6)
came to be enthroned in political power, wherever the writ of the
Sultans ran, the proselytising activities of isl@m became active.. (6)
... Hindus were denied the right to public worship and were subjected to civil disabilities and other indignities and many communities, particularly in the lower strata of society, took to the new faith in order to escape these hardships"
How difficult is it learn from history?
How difficult is it learn from history?
The scoundrels who ratted fellow Hindus in the recent Temple case must be ashamed of themselves.
In their insufferable show of moral superiority complex, they have ruined the lives of Hindus of that place who have been bravely guarding their Temples in difficult circumstances.
In their insufferable show of moral superiority complex, they have ruined the lives of Hindus of that place who have been bravely guarding their Temples in difficult circumstances.
That too without hearing to the other side of the story. What pathetic people. Shameful. The tragedy is that
1) Zero lessons have been learnt from history.
2) This nonsense will keep repeating because too many "Hindus" suffer from some fake moral superiority complex.
1) Zero lessons have been learnt from history.
2) This nonsense will keep repeating because too many "Hindus" suffer from some fake moral superiority complex.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
