Justice NV Ramana led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear a case regarding persons killed in fake #encounters by police personnel and personnel in uniform of the armed forces of the Union. The case was originally filed in 2012 leading to a judgment against police excess
Senior Advocate Dr Menaka Guruswamy to appear as the Amicus Curiae @MenakaGuruswamy
Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta: Let me tell you the prayer.
SG: Its the case about Forces at the Manipur border and why did they shoot
Justice Ramana: That is not the issue
SG: CBI had passed an order in August, 2017
Justice Ramana: Today we will deal with the discharge application regarding the officer
SG: this is not an area for amicus to make submissions
Guruswamy: Application by CBI is not listed today. On 5.7.2018 NHRC was made a part of the SIT
Justice Surya Kant: we can allow the officer to be discharged since he is retiring. Centre can substitute someone else
SG: please demarcate role of amicus. They cannot run CBI
SG: This is happening in every matter. They can assist on question of law and nothing else. It's happening in other case.
Justice Ramana: You are a senior officer and Solicitor-General, we know what amicus does. Let us not get into that.Tell us who will you replace officer with
SG: I will submit a list, the Amicus can select.
Senior Adv Basava Patil: This officer was with SIT and then promoted as DIG and was a part of NHRC. Let the promotion be given effect. I want to join the police.
Justice Ramana: Once you are out how can you seek to enter
Patil: I am only seeking release as per letter. Nothing more
Senior Adv Colin Gonsalves: There is a huge backlog of 655 cases. Replacement must happen immediately
#SupremeCourt: officer may be allowed to discharge his post and join promoted post. Centre is directed to provide a suitable officer expeditiously.
Matter over
Solicitor-General: Please demarcate the line by which your Lordships be assisted by amicus. We are seeing this since decades. We can file an application. It's not for @MenakaGuruswamy and in general I am not inputing motives to any Individual. They cannot be running the law.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt bench states that it was of the opinion that a committee be formed to frame guidelines on ascertaining economic value of trees to be felled. However CJI says it might not be able to pursue the committee report on time (CJI Bobde to retire in end of April)
CJI SA Bobde: We will lay down guidelines which needs to be taken into account for ascertaining the economic value of trees.
CJI: we had said Ranjeet Singh is a senior member in this field and be in the committee
SG: He is not well
CJI: he had appeared before us. He seems quite well
CJI SA Bobde led bench to hear transfer petitions filed by Serum Institute of India and Bharat Biotech seeking to transfer the pending cases from Delhi HC and other courts to #SupremeCourt
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi appears for @BharatBiotech : Delhi HC heard a suo motu writ petiton. We want a stay on the order. Lawyers were interested in the issue and they joined proceedings
CJI: show me the Delhi HC order
Rohatgi: Both of us including @SerumInstIndia appeared
We were asked capacity to manufacture #COVID19vaccines , capacity to transport etc. Even centre was asked to reply on the similar issues. Why 45 years to 60 years was the rationale for vaccines and we were asked for it
Justice SS Shinde led bench of #BombayHighCourt will continue hearing the plea filed by @republic TV challenging the proceedings initiated by the @MumbaiPolice in the #TRPScam case today.
In previous hearing the Court demanded why @republic and #ArnabGoswami were not named as accused in the matter. The State will respond to this today.
CJI SA Bobde led bench to hear a plea by Central government (Narcotics Control Bureau) against Bombay High Court decision granting Regular Bail to @Tweet2Rhea (Rhea Chakraborty) in the NDPS case. #SushantSinghRajput #RheaChakraborty
Solicitor-General: We know you will not interfere in the grant of bail. But my worry is Bombay HC has made wide ranging interpretation if NDPS Act which will make the Act meaningless
CJI: We interfere in bail. But you can come here only if you challenge the bail order and not finding of the High Court in a bail order