On the genesis of "denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula," a loaded term coined by #KimIlSung (조선반도의 비핵화) in 1975, how we have come to love Big Brother & what it means, & why @POTUS admin is right to say "denuclearization of North Korea." @Mister_G_2@freekorea_us 1/
At their meeting on April 18, 1975, Mao rejected Kim 's request for help building the bomb. Thereafter, Kim came up with the idea of calling for withdrawal of US nuclear warheads from SK while calling for a “Korean Peninsula Nuclear-Free Zone.” (Thae Yong Ho, 2018 Memoir, 44). 2/
In 1980 Kim announced with Japan Socialist Party in a joint statement “Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.” (Thae, 45). In 1985 Kim announced “Korean Peninsula Nuclear-Free Peace Zone” and joined the IAEA, while pursuing the nuclearization of the DPRK. 3/
By 1990s, these phrases became routinized. Japan also sought to have a say in bringing about a "Korean Peninsula Nuclear-Free Zone" and sought talks with NK. NK insisted withdrawal of all US tactical nuclear weapons from SK as the condition for "DOTKP." tinyurl.com/2km657hm 4/
As @Joshua_Pollack notes, NK & SK signed a Joint Declaration of DOTKP, which took effect in Feb 1992. All US nukes were withdrawn from SK in 1991. Meanwhile, NK pressed ahead. For SK to concede DOTKP in talks with NK in 1991-92 was reasonable. But, 5/ tinyurl.com/twyzxc4x
for the US repeatedly to make this concession from 1994 to 2020 in written statements, UNSCRs, and agreements with NK was...imprudent. The US, with SK's prodding, continued to make unforced errors. DOTKP pops up in the 1994 Agreed Framework. tinyurl.com/28y7cxfb 6/
Strangely, 11 years later, in 2005, after NK declared itself a nuclear weapons state on Feb 10 that year & after all that was known of NK's HEU program, restart of Yonbyon upon 2003 withdrawal from NPT, the US & SK conceded once again in the Sept 19, 2005 6PT Joint Statement. 7/
To enshrine DOTKP in 6PT was a serious tactical error when NK was rushing toward its 1st nuclear test. At least the joint statement contained the explicit phrase: "The DPRK committed to abandoning all nuclear weapons and existing nuclear programs." tinyurl.com/3rjb3nse 8/
However, following NK's first nuclear test on Oct 9, 2006, 15 years after the removal of all US nukes from SK, every UNSC Resolutions banning *North Korea's* nuclear and missile test/dev't curiously adopted this DPRK stock phrase, "denuclearization of the Korean peninsula." 9/
Through the 6 Party Talks, Kim Jong Il bought time to build more bombs & missiles. Still, the US, SK & JPN agreed to DOTKP in the 02/13/2007 joint statement Again, this favored DPRK phrase is featured in every UNSCR since Res 1718 in 2006 (Para 13) tinyurl.com/4vhpwmm4 10/
See Paragraph 30 in UNSCR 1874, passed in the aftermath of NK's 2nd nuclear test on May 25, 2009, US Memorial Day. It's in the tougher UNSC resolutions 2016-2017, starting with Res 2270 of Mar 2016 (Para 50) and tinyurl.com/2m4heeza tinyurl.com/9rsr39r 11/
the latest, Res 2397, of Dec 2017 (Para 26), passed in the wake of NK's 3rd ICBM test in Nov.
On 12/20/2018, lest the US firm up and start calling for "denuclearization of North Korea," #KCNA clarified what it meant by DOTKP. Yes, mutual disarmament. tinyurl.com/h3j5nps /12
The world's been played by 3 generations of NK leaders. When Kim 2 said, "DOTKP was my father's dying wish," or Kim 3 says, "I want my children to live in a nuclear-free Korean peninsula," they mean one thing: SK bereft of nukes, US nuclear assets, USFK, & alliance w US. 13/
For Biden to insist on denuke of "NK" will displease NK. It may impede/prevent talks. But it doesn't give NK a free pass to forge ahead while US pretends DOTKP is taking place. Consider the costs, risks & greater probability of war in agreeing to DOTKP, the end state of which 14/
is to leave SK vulnerable to a nuclear NK, and a giant leap toward NK at last fulfilling what the founder sought in June 1950--completion of the "supreme national task" of liberating SK and establishing a United #DPRK.
Or, SK, feeling existential crisis, can go nuclear. 15/15
2 years ago today, #Trump walked out on #KimJongUn in Hanoi, w lunch all set on table. Greatest snub princeling-turned-deified dictator has ever faced. Trum walked away from a deal that would have enabled Kim to build more bombs undisturbed. but he also embarrassed himself by 1/
saying at the presser Kim had told him that Kim didn't know about the hostage-taking, torture & unlawful killing of #OttoWarmbier, "and I will take him at his word." Otto's parents issued a statement: "We have been respectful during this summit process. Now we must speak out." 2/
"Kim and his evil regime are responsible for the death of our son Otto. Kim and his evil regime are responsible for unimaginable cruelty and inhumanity. No excuses or lavish praise can change that."
Defending the #DPRK dictator a curious trend 3/ ghttps://tinyurl.com/fe2pk2tk
#KCNA 8/14: #KimJongUn relieved Premier Kim Jae Ryong of #DPRK Cabinet & appointed Kim Tok Hun new premier.
Before much meaningless verbiage is spilled over the meaning of this, here's former NK diplomat @Thaeyongho on hierarchy & myth of "Military-First Politics." My tr. 1/
“Many N. Korea experts in the South assessed that in the wake of Kim Jong Il brandishing his “Military Politics” slogan during the famine of the late-1990s, power in the DPRK had shifted from the party to the military. Since Kim Jong Un came to power," 2/
"
"they offered up the analysis that power had shifted back from the military to the party. Some assess who is No. 2 and No. 3 etc. in the hierarchy based on nominal rank alone. All this is an empty feast of words due to ignorance of the role of the central party." 3/
Former #DPRK Deputy Amb to the #UK@Thaeyongho on North Korea's nuclear deceive-and-stall strategy, from his 2018 memoir (in Korean). My own translation.
"The Sept 19, 2005 Six-Party Talks joint statement is the product of the Kim Jong Il’s deceive-and-stall strategy." 1/
“There are still folks in SK who blame the US for the breakdown of the Sept 19 Joint Statement. They argue that since the U.S. did not abide by the agreement and put pressure on NK, NK had no other option than to develop nukes. But, to this date, NK has not once stopped" 2/
"its nuclear weapons development. NK’s nukes are not something that can ever be stopped by statements or agreements.” (186)
DPRK embassy in London opened in April 2003. Ri Yong Ho was the first amb. FM Kang Suk Ju to Ri as Ri departed for the UK: “Do your best to use the UK 3/
I. #KimIlSung's "Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" racket
#MaoZedong told Kim at dinner 4/18/1975 not to "even dream of developing nuclear weapons," as it "will devastate the economy and people’s lives will suffer.” (44) 2/
Kim was disheartened. From mid-1975 on Kim vociferously called for the withdrawal of US nuclear warheads from SK; announced a “Korean Peninsula Nuclear-Free Zone” & started his covert nuclear program. In 1980 announced with Japan’s Socialist Party in a joint statement 3/
1. Useful to US, useless "to us" 2. Sitting w Americans a waste of time & risks damaging the special rels b/t KJU & Trump 3. No need to grant a summit predicted by "Trash-like Bolton" 1/
"The US must be afraid it may receive the hitherto undelivered Christmas gift before the election."
Says KJU made it clear to #Trump at 6/30/19 meeting he'll never swap additional denuclearization measures Trump wants with petty sanctions relief just for rapid econ dev't
2/
Since, NK has "totally trashed the issue of sanctions relief in talks agenda with the US." She believes basic theme of NK-US negotiations, "denuclearization measures vs sanctions relief," now must be rectified by frame of "hostile policy withdrawal vs NK-US talks resumption" 3/
Kim Yo Jong, first vice department director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea, released the following statement on Saturday:
I fully sympathize with the statement released by the director of the 1/
United Front Department of the Central Committee of the WPK yesterday.
If the south Korean authorities have now capability and courage to carry out at once the thing they have failed to do for the past two years, why are the north-south relations still in stalemate like now? 2/
We should not lend an ear to and trust the trite language let out by them for only form's sake as they always make a fuss belatedly, nor pardon the sins committed by the betrayers and human scum.
Getting stronger day by day are the unanimous voices of all our people 3/