“How do open-ended questions improve interpersonal communication?”

TL;DR: They do not.
 
Let’s explore a common #communication assumption about 'open' and 'closed' questions with some data to see what they look like, and what they do, in real interaction.
 
1. Thread. 🧵
2. Google "open and closed questions” and you’ll find loads of articles and (often written or hypothetical) examples about them - tweet 1 is just one of many.

As @d_galasinski pondered recently: “I wonder who is responsible for fetishising open questions.”
3. When we examine questions as they are actually used - ‘in the wild’ - we find that yes/no (‘closed’) questions routinely receive more than ‘yes/no’ in response.

And just because a question is ‘open’ doesn’t mean it'll be answered.

Let’s see some examples.
4. Here's another example from a group of friends chatting.

[#EMCA researchers use the 'Jefferson' system for transcription - to find out more, see @alexahepburn @BoldenGalina's book 'Transcribing for Social Research'.]
5. Just saying 'yes' or 'no' - even when the question requires 'yes' or 'no' - can even seem a bit rude ...
6. Here's an example from a first date. The couple has been talking about what they like in a partner.

If someone answers an 'open' ('wh-') question with a a closed response (line 11), perhaps the date isn't going well... 😬
7. Why do people so regularly give more than a 'closed' response to an apparently 'closed' question?

When we look at real talk, rather than imagine talk, it seems pretty ordinary to do so (as in this example from research with @S_Parslow @MFlinkfeldt)
8. In response to a 'closed' question from the patient, the #GP receptionist doesn’t just say ‘no’.

Her response conveys ‘no’ while ALSO providing an account for not saying ‘yes’ (as in this example from research with @rein_ove @symondsjon) - because the question is a request.
9. Here's an example of rapidly repeated responses to a 'closed' question - again, doing more than required and doing it early (it's from a study of antenatal consultations conducted with @MagnusHamann @DoctorDot2 @jayne_wagstaff)
10. Here's an elaborate 'no'.
11. In this example, the cafe staff apparently doesn't understand that people make requests by asking a yes/no closed question 🤔
12. Of course, there are always survey questions, where responses can be constrained by the design of the form, like in these examples from my friends @typeform
13. Politicians often resist answering 'closed' questions, like this famous example from 1997 in which Jeremy Paxman asks Michael Howard the same yes/no question - "Did you threaten to overrule him?” - 14 times 🤔

14. Since #LineOfDuty is back, it's timely to also show that some questions will not be answered no matter what the design of the question.
15. Here’s an article by @LucasSeuren & Mike Huiskes showing how ‘very closed’ questions readily get 'open' long answers.

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
16. "When yes is not enough":

An article by @JakobSteensig & Trine Heinemann shows that “certain actions, which are carried out as yes/no questions, demand a response unit that consists of ‘yes’ plus an elaboration.”
17. Finally, grammar and question design can save lives, as this call to 911 shows.

The dispatcher asks 'yes/no' questions to enable the caller to get emergency help without asking for it.
18. In sum:

Questions are vehicles for different actions. They are always embedded a sequence. They're not simply 'open' or 'closed'.

To read more research on naturally occurring interaction, visit emcawiki.net/EMCA_bibliogra…

End 🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth Stokoe

Elizabeth Stokoe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LizStokoe

25 Feb
"'How are you?' These are the three most useless words in the world of communication."

This compelling (but wrong/daft) assertion is the kind of thing people think they know about talk but don't.

It's one of many communication myths that we should bust.

1. Thread.
2. "How are you" is often deemed a 'pointless' or 'filler' question, to which the socially acceptable answer might be a lie ("fine, how are you?").

"How are you" should not be taken as an opportunity to "discuss the crushing reality of existence."

reaction.life/machells-guide…
3. Here's two friends starting a telephone conversation. It's rapid, what they do is rapid, reciprocal, recurrent, and recognizable – almost banal.

But every turn in this conversation is data, telling us about the kind of conversation it's likely to be.
Read 12 tweets
10 Jan
Regarding the UK gov's new Covid campaign (“Act like you've got the virus”), I was asked on @SkyNews yesterday if “there is a problem with compliance now in terms of people adhering ... is the message is clear enough?”

Preparing took me down messaging rabbit holes.

🧵
2. On Friday night, to prepare for the interview, I duly looked at @DHSCgovuk's campaign.

Prof Whitty speaks to camera: “We must all stay home. If it is essential to go out, remember wash your hands, cover your face indoors, and keep your distance from others.”
3. The new campaign combines March 2020's strap-line – “Stay Home>Protect the NHS>Save Lives” with new messages (e.g., about the new variant).

“We all NEED” (below) is not the same as Whitty's “We MUST” - or the very clear "You MUST stay at home" text message from March 2020.
Read 17 tweets
16 Nov 20
🚨New #IndieSAGE paper🚨

1. From Stay Home to Stay Alert, UK government messaging has been much discussed during the #COVID19 pandemic. #IndieSAGE has analysed its effects (March-Oct 2020) and makes recommendations for a communication reset.

🔗bit.ly/3kBrpp6

🧵 Image
2. It is through language that #COVID19 laws, regulations, rules, and guidance are written - which must be understood, interpreted, and acted upon by people. Precise messaging is easier to understand and act upon.

For instance, what counts as 'mingling'?

(@AdamWagner1) Image
3. While 90% of people believed that “Stay home, protect the NHS, save lives” was clear, "Stay Alert" was immediately challenged, rejected by other UK nations, criticized, satirized, and - crucially - not understood by 65% of people. Image
Read 14 tweets
11 Sep 20
🧵

1. Why does @IndependentSage recommend maximizing remote learning at #Universities from the START of term?

Does SAGE agree?

Does the UK Government #FollowTheScience? And will Universities?

🤔
2. #IndependentSAGE agrees with SAGE that, in Autumn in HE, “significant outbreaks are likely" that "could amplify local & national transmission"; that "this requires national oversight”, & that “asymptomatic transmission may make these harder to detect”.

3. Our report published yesterday maps, in detail, the overlap between SAGE and #IndependentSAGE's principles and recommendations, and is summarized below:

🔗 bit.ly/3mdhXKL
Read 16 tweets
27 Aug 20
🧵 #COVID19 and the discourse of 'anxiety' 💬

1. People are ‘returning’ or ‘going back’ to work and good employers are putting safety measures in place.

In the mix, we're witnessing the division of people into categories: ‘comfortable’, '(ir)rational', 'reluctant', ‘anxious’.
2. Today sees an overt push/threat to stop #wft

#TomorrowsPapersToday @hendopolis
3. If I do my job from home for a while longer, which I'm lucky enough to be able to (although my partner, a keyworker, is not), I reduce transmission risk for myself AND others - by being one less body to d i s t a n c e from, need a mask for, etc.

#wfh
Read 13 tweets
11 Aug 20
A thread on the 'quality’ of F2F vs online interaction.

While ‘communication is key’, what we know about communication, inc. online, often rests on stereotypes or anecdata.

So when it comes to the ‘quality’ of online interaction, what is fact and what is communication myth?
1. The biggest assumption is that being ‘in person’ equates to better ‘quality’ (I’m mostly avoiding 'F2F' because we *are* F2F when video is enabled). But I’m putting a hypothesis out there:

(In)effective communicators are (in)effective communicators regardless of modality 😉
2. There are lots of myths about what constitutes communication ‘quality’ even before we get to differentials across modalities. When it comes to remote interaction, the focus is often on already-tenuous things (e.g., rapport) rather than how people simply *get stuff done*.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!