The German Association for Asian Studies (DGA) can no longer hide behind it’s proclaimed ‘neutral’ position @feiduoli. The DGA has to address the Chinese Communist Party’s threat to #academicfreedom. We should stand in solidarity with @adrianzenz, @MareikeOhlberg and @gusiting /1
A learned society should address the threat which the CCP's political censorship poses to open-ended knowledge production. Yet in June 2020 the DGA board issued a controversial statement 'Beware the polarisation'. It's claim to 'neutrality' was widely criticised on Twitter /2
A German and English-language version of the DGA board's highly controversial statement 'Beware the polarisation' is available here /3 aktuell.asienforschung.de/ein-plaedoyer-…
For more information about the CCP’s bullying of German China specialists Adrian Zenz, Mareike Ohlberg and Kristin Shi-Kupfer see the following mini thread 🧵 /4
See also this thread 🧵 on @FriederikeBoege and @MichaelaWiegel's excellent article in @faznet about the CCP's attempts to 'control the global narrative about China' with the help of 'defamation and intimidation' #academicfreedom /5
Good to see that European Research Institute Directors are pushing back. Now it is time for German learned societies and professional associations like #DGA to do the same /7 ui.se/english/news/2…
"The CCP retaliated by sanctioning five MPs, lawyers and - what I find particularly galling - a British academic and Xinjiang expert, Dr Jo Smith Finley @j_smithfinley. She is a Reader in Chinese Studies at Newcastle University" - Andreas Fulda on @AlJazeera, 26 March 2021 /1
"Both sides now are in a double bind. The CCP will not back down ... but neither can western liberal democracies afford to give ground when it comes to dealing with what is effectively a genocide in Xinjiang. Right now I can't see an off ramp in terms of diplomacy." @AlJazeera /2
"What we've seen is an overreaction. Many commentators have noted that the counter-sanctions were disproportionate. They also not only targeted state actors but also civil society & academia. In Germany a very well respected think tank @merics_eu was put on the sanction list" /3
As scholars we have a shared responsibility to address the issue of domestic and international threats to #AcademicFreedom in the UK. @DavidJRMissal and I developed the following framework when discussing Germany's case in an article for the International Journal of Human Rights.
Good to see that the Academic Freedom and Internationalisation Working Group (AFIWG) has issued this statement.
This is getting ridiculous. Now the Chinese Communist Party is sanctioning nine individuals and four entities in the UK 🇬🇧 for their critique of the party-state’s crimes against humanity. Particularly galling is the singling out of fellow academic @j_smithfinley#AcademicFreedom
Here is the statement of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs h/t @MahmutRahima
The Chinese Communist Party “warns the UK side not go further down the wrong path”. Such bullying shows us what kind of regime we are dealing with. Time for the British state and British civil society to push back against the CCP’s authoritarian overreach. globaltimes.cn/page/202103/12…
In this German-language report @FriederikeBoege and @MichaelaWiegel write about the Chinese Communist Party's attempts to 'control the global narrative about China' with the help of 'defamation and intimidation' /1
This report is remarkable for various reasons. In the past there has been a great reluctance among German elites to pick a fight with the Chinese Communist Party. But now that the party-state has sanctioned the widely respected German think tank @merics_eu, things will change /2
As @FriederikeBoege and @MichaelaWiegel rightly point out, @merics_eu is hardly a hawkish think tank. Under @m_huotari's leadership it has gained a reputation of being both critical and constructive. Merics is widely respected, both within the German government and academia /3
Former German Chancellor Gerhard 'Gazprom' Schroeder has done it again. In a new German-language op-ed for @handelsblatt he argues against a value-based European China policy. What follows is a critique of his simplistic analysis of EU-China relations /1
He frames EU-China relations in opposition to the geopolitical rivalry between the US and China, which he likens to a new Cold War.
Schroeder argues for multipolarity, European sovereignty & demands that in future reforms EU member states renounce further sovereignty rights /2
When it comes to China he briefly mentions that Beijing has smashed Hong Kong's democracy movement and that religious and ethnic groups are being suppressed. He also recognises the expansionism in the South China Sea. Schroeder calls all of the above a 'controlled offensive' /3
🔸What follows is the text of the open letter in full 🔸
We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned by the China-European Union Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) and call on the European Union to withdraw from this agreement 2/32
The signal sent by both the timing and the substance of CAI is that European leaders are set on pursuing access to Chinese markets, even if this is at the expense of the bloc’s values and national security. 3/32