sorry, but this is literally the ideology of competitive authoritarianism
coincidentally, the people walsh thinks are qualified to vote are disproportionately white elites who think like him
there's a legacy of racism angle here, but for now i'll just share my blog post on how public opinion scholars have thought about the "quality" of a person's attitudes from the last time prominent conservatives proposed restrictions for restriction's sake gelliottmorris.substack.com/p/democracy-is…
if you want to select for "quality" inputs into a republican, representative government like the US, you can do the filtering either at the voting stage or the representation stage. the first option can get you really close to a lot of nasty anti-democratic stuff

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with G. Elliott Morris

G. Elliott Morris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gelliottmorris

25 Mar
#NEW A study of movie theater showings of the racist film Birth of a Nation shows that lynchings rose 5x in the places it was shown, while KKK activity shot up for generations after. Our piece on @ProfDesmondAng’s paper. A long legacy of violent hate. economist.com/graphic-detail…
This graph is pretty terrifying in how it reminds you how easy it is to manipulate people with media
.@ProfDesmondAng’s modeling found that counties that had screened The Birth of a Nation were nearly 70 percentage points more likely to have a Ku Klux Klan chapter (Klavern) 2 decades later (around 1935). Between 2000-2019, the effect was still detectable: an 18 %age point jump.
Read 6 tweets
25 Mar
Grading pollsters purely on their topline performance in recent elections leads to some weird problems under the hood — like giving a black-box firm that said Trump would win 30% of black voters an A- rating. Helpful to note the limitations with @NateSilver538's grade ratings
If you took a test and got like 10 questions wrong, but the teacher picked the 1 you got right to actually grade, are you actually a good student?
The point is not that the ratings are bad, but they're blind to data quality issues -- if you're getting good toplines because sampling and weighting errors are canceling each other out, it's fair to question whether the grade actually reflects the quality
Read 6 tweets
22 Mar
i) The population ratio between large and small states is bigger than it has ever been

ii) Geographic polarization is also harsher than ever, rendering the small-state bias much more important

iii) Diluting the power of the numerical majority is by definition anti-democratic
iv) I do not see how these points would be arguments in favor of the filibuster even if they _were_ true
Read 4 tweets
20 Mar
The optimal strategy when punditing on more than two options is to give a 40% chance to the top scenario and get everything else as close as possible. Summers should have gone with:

40% rapid growth + inflation
20% rapid growth, no inflation
20% stagflation
20% recession
In a binary bet, eg between inflation and no inflation, it’s optimal for a pundit to assign a 60-40 split between the options. That way they’re usually right, but if they’re wrong they get to say “I told you so” and are usually less wrong than other people.
This is probably a horrible way to make money, but it’s a reasonably good strategy for relative media credibility if you kinda know what you’re talking about but haven’t developed a good model to approximate reality
Read 4 tweets
18 Mar
Alexander knows what he's talking about here. Our polling with YouGov finds that ~12% of adults say they've received 2doses of the vaccine, which is the same share the CDC reports. Don't see much evidence of response bias, except maybe some expressive hesitancy from Republicans.
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
Here's my best estimate of how each Democratic Senator compares to a "replacement senator" on two metrics:

a) How much they outperform partisan benchmarks electorally
b) How much more liberal they are than the *average* senator that would replace them

github.com/elliottmorris/…
Another way of looking at this:
The code is here. This was just a fun project I coded up last night — I'm sure there are ways y'all could change/improve it!

github.com/elliottmorris/…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!