Theoretically the explosive contents of 2 MOABs could be placed as charges, enabling the military to blast most of the ship up into the air. The wreckage would then rain down outside the canal.
This would cost only $300,000 for materials, and maybe $3 million in labor.
However!
As an astute reader points out, the canal is not built to handle explosions of this magnitude.
It might simply create an artificial salt lake, but it might also do many other things. At this point geological surveys get involved.
While we're at it - to fully turn every bit of the Ever Given into molten slag rather than just blasting it up in the air would require ~6,100 MOABs, which in my understanding is more than the armies of the world have in stock.
It could certainly be done with massed nuclear weapons, but "nuke the Suez Canal because it's blocked" does not qualify as getting the canal functional in a timely fashion.
Congratulations, humanity.
You have managed to build boats so big that you can't fully destroy them without resorting to nukes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There was a town in China famous for its beautiful lakes, which drew a lot of tourists. This inspired a local gang leader to try to kidnap some foreigners for ransom.
As happens sometimes when conducting international negotiations for large sums of money, the deal fell through.
This resulted in a dead foreigner, which was COMPLETELY unacceptable to the government's plans to develop the area.
The Red Army was sent in. The commander was told to fix the problem. He was not told to respect anyone's rights. He was told to FIX THE PROBLEM.
In China if you're a bureaucrat long enough you become a Party member, and if you do that well for a decade you become inner circle, and then you can order people killed.
Same guy later in that thread claimed that the Kennedys (who ordered lobotomies and had them covered up) and Clintons (who may or may not have a 50+ body count) don't have REAL aristocratic power.
Sounds to me like they got away with way more than the average feudal lord 🤔
Why do people do this?
"I'm a free thinker, I think dangerous thoughts"
Followed by
"No you just can't criticize modernity, no way, that's BS and I'm muting this thread"
High stakes means people are on the lookout for anything bad.
And honestly, if you get vetoed by one interviewer, you probably didn't vibe with them. That may or may not be "your fault" but you CAN work on being positive and high-energy.
In #biology, anything that increases your odds of offspring is beneficial and anything that decreases it is maladaptive.
The paradigm of "not settling for less" means that most women high earners have a substantially decreased chance of getting married and having kids.
Note that this decreased chance comes about by a variety of mechanisms - time/energy commitment to the business as well as increased standards for men.