High stakes means people are on the lookout for anything bad.
And honestly, if you get vetoed by one interviewer, you probably didn't vibe with them. That may or may not be "your fault" but you CAN work on being positive and high-energy.
The CEO sitting in on an interview might consider the position non-essential, and so his priorities might be: look like a leader, spend a minimum of mental energy on this.
The middle manager might be embattled, so her priority might be: get someone I can trust to follow my lead.
Priorities can be negative, too.
The team lead might have a position of: please not another tech bro, anything but a techbro!
People might not want gingers, disabled people, or white men.
They might want to find someone they can bully into accepting minimal pay.
There's no way for you to know these things in advance, and unless they're idiots, most people will not explicitly state their irrational preferences. They may not even recognize them!
But the more skills you have, the more you can react to the initial data you get.
Were you a frat bro? Try to see early on if an interviewer was as well.
Do you have a southern accent, along with the interviewer, in a company where most don't? Don't downplay it, then!
Are you a veteran? Look for the vets on the team!
Anything that lets you break the ice can also give you a chance to break the rigid structure of the interview and turn it into a normal conversation between humans. You want that. That's called building rapport.
Your job at the interview is not to convince the team you are technically skilled. Your resume does that. Your job is to convince them that you're a great person to work with.
If you can get them to visualize working with you and succeeding, you've done well.
There's an old joke that standardized tests don't test you on anything but how good you are at taking tests.
In effect, this means test-taking skill is a specialized art, deadly within one singular application and useless outside of it.
Well, the interview is a place where social skills are supreme. You may need a resume to get through the door, but once you're in, high social skills can substitute for technical skill, experience, and connections.
Hone this power!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In #biology, anything that increases your odds of offspring is beneficial and anything that decreases it is maladaptive.
The paradigm of "not settling for less" means that most women high earners have a substantially decreased chance of getting married and having kids.
Note that this decreased chance comes about by a variety of mechanisms - time/energy commitment to the business as well as increased standards for men.
Every functional society since the dawn of time has had winners and losers, because a society that cannot assign resources and determine winners and losers is one that doesn't have to be obeyed at all, or in other words, one that is extremely likely to fall apart.
"But, like, imagine if everyone just had everything they needed provided to them. Wouldn't it be so peaceful?"
Congratulations. You have just managed to describe Africa, where for many years they got food shipments for everyone but warlords intercepted them.
The relevance and reasonableness of strategies depend heavily on whether you want to keep the purchasing power of your current dollars within the US, or internationally.
Obviously, in either case you can consider some physical gold and bitcoin.
But physical gold and bitcoin do not generate cash flow. So after that, you have to ask yourself what you believe is a likely scenario of collapse and where you will be standing when it happens.
If you're planning to be in the US the whole time, buying real estate as a performing asset that hedges against inflation works quite well.
If you're planning to leave and go outside the US post-collapse, that's questionable because it's still dollar denominated.
A biologist asked the other day why everyone feels qualified to have opinions on biology and if his is the only field that is treated with this level of contempt.
Since I have talked publicly about #money#mindset for years, I had to laugh.
"Everyone knows what money is" is on the same level of logic as "look, everybody can read and write these days, so anybody can be a writer."
Theoretically this is kind of true, but in reality is it?
If people widely suck at a thing despite having an introduction to it, and don't accomplish their goals, consider that maybe the field actually has some depth beyond the introductory level.
Watching a lot of people flip out at @BrianNiemeier without understanding the issues involved.
Here's the skinny.
1. Brian is known for a controversial test when people act like pundits on what Christianity is or isn't. He asks them to publicly confess faith in Christ.
@BrianNiemeier 2. This is to see if they have skin in the game, because there have been, over the last few hundred years especially, a LOT of bad-faith attempts to redefine or redirect Christianity to serve someone's immediate political goals.
@BrianNiemeier 3. The controversy: the term he uses when he informs someone that he has no desire to continue discussing his faith with someone who comes in bad faith is "witch."
Outside of rural Africa or Indonesia, where you can still be killed for it, "witch" is not really pejorative now.