Mori Profile picture
28 Mar, 16 tweets, 4 min read
Rags to riches is nice for status but not power.

In China if you're a bureaucrat long enough you become a Party member, and if you do that well for a decade you become inner circle, and then you can order people killed.

What's the path to that in the US?
Same guy later in that thread claimed that the Kennedys (who ordered lobotomies and had them covered up) and Clintons (who may or may not have a 50+ body count) don't have REAL aristocratic power.

Sounds to me like they got away with way more than the average feudal lord 🤔
Why do people do this?

"I'm a free thinker, I think dangerous thoughts"

Followed by

"No you just can't criticize modernity, no way, that's BS and I'm muting this thread"
"Haha ChiComs and DPRK are so full of propaganda, thankfully I'm smart and see through it.

"What do you mean Anglos and the US also have propaganda and people in the West are just brainwashed differently? No way, I think I would have noticed!"

#mindset
Here's a hint:

If you're arguing in favor of modernity

And all your stats are from 1800 forward, when progress was already basically a universal religion and everyone hated feudalism

You're basically solely regurgitating biased studies from true believers.
You know how there was a splinter church called Christian Science, and they would like, pray about bacteria and note any changes?

And it turned out their data were all cherry-picked?

Most studies that "prove" modernity is better are affected by this same phenomenon.
There's a famous experiment called Milliken's Oil Drop experiment that shows the fundamental charge of the electron. Most scientists know this. But what they fail to grasp is the #HISTORY of verifying Milliken's Oil Drop, which is even MORE valuable.
See, it turns out that while Milliken had interesting ideas, he wasn't that hot as an experimentalist.

He was off by a LOT.

And only a decade or two later, a famous scientist got a value that was a lot closer to the correct value!

But the value took 50+ years to update. Why?
Because the value the other scientist got was off by TOO MUCH. And so they redid the experiment and then got a value closer to Milliken's published value, and submitted THAT.

#science
And everyone else, when they subsequently did it, were likewise afraid to say Milliken and everyone before them were TOTALLY OFF, and settled for saying they were slightly off.

So it took 50+ years.

What does this tell us?

HUMAN NATURE IS POWERFUL.

#mindset
ALWAYS BET ON NATURE.

When humans are involved that means bet on human nature.

Does it mean you'll win 100% of the time? Of course not; humans are complicated.

But most of the time it's the right way to bet.

#mindset
Lessons:

1. The failure of modern systems - be they systems of governance, bad business, or dumb websites - is that they misstate or fail to account for human nature.

If you can avoid that pitfall you'll do better than the vast majority.
2. Don't think yourself clever and thus exempt from this rule.

Clever people still fall for propaganda - be it Communist, modernist, or other.

Clever people still make mistakes in their systems design.
Communism couldn't work because Marx and Engels - who came from clever families - couldn't see beyond their own rich boy lives. They severely underestimated the importance of the meaning of the work to the worker, dismissing it as peasant superstition.

That's a banker's view.
America is falling apart because the Founding Fathers - who were the most educated men of their time - couldn't anticipate the vast changes of the past 200 years.

And other democracies are failing to the extent that they copied America instead of making democracy their own.
Poor artists copy.

Great artists steal.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mori

Mori Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @moritheil

28 Mar
Whatever else may be said of China, I do not think they would station 25,000 troops in a city only to have taxi drivers murdered in broad daylight.

In fact, this reminds me of a story.
There was a town in China famous for its beautiful lakes, which drew a lot of tourists. This inspired a local gang leader to try to kidnap some foreigners for ransom.

As happens sometimes when conducting international negotiations for large sums of money, the deal fell through.
This resulted in a dead foreigner, which was COMPLETELY unacceptable to the government's plans to develop the area.

The Red Army was sent in. The commander was told to fix the problem. He was not told to respect anyone's rights. He was told to FIX THE PROBLEM.
Read 6 tweets
28 Mar
This kind of thing is honestly why I don't think Chinese dissidents will succeed.

It's not a moral statement. I'm coming at it from a #marketing point of view.
1. You have an EXTREMELY narrow window of attention from the average person and must make a memorable, coherent statement in that time.

What's it gonna be?

"China bad"?

"Don't trust the CCP but trust us, we're not like those other Chinese"?

"Human rights good"?
1 is self-defeating.

2 is automatically suspect.

3 is ill-defined and opens you up to the criticism that you've been overly Westernized.

There is no hand to play that doesn't look lame to a neutral bystander.
Read 17 tweets
26 Mar
The Ever Given is 200,000 tons of mostly steel. Steel takes 1.4×10^9 J per ton to melt.

The MOAB is 21,000 lbs, containing 18,500 lbs of explosive, with a reported cost of $170k. It has a yield of 4.6 x 10^10 joules.
Theoretically the explosive contents of 2 MOABs could be placed as charges, enabling the military to blast most of the ship up into the air. The wreckage would then rain down outside the canal.

This would cost only $300,000 for materials, and maybe $3 million in labor.

However!
As an astute reader points out, the canal is not built to handle explosions of this magnitude.

It might simply create an artificial salt lake, but it might also do many other things. At this point geological surveys get involved.

Read 6 tweets
6 Oct 20
High stakes means people are on the lookout for anything bad.

And honestly, if you get vetoed by one interviewer, you probably didn't vibe with them. That may or may not be "your fault" but you CAN work on being positive and high-energy.

Let me do a quick thread on #interviews.
I've done hundreds of interviews, both as interviewer and interviewee, and most people grossly misunderstand how #interviews work.

First off, an interview is human interaction.
This seems obvious but the point is, it's not a neutral infodump. It's a vibe check.

What that means is a little more complicated, because people are complicated.

If you are awesome and they can pick up on it, great! Unless they're insecure, in which case it goes against you.
Read 13 tweets
6 Oct 20
Learned a new word today: Bhimta.

No, not Bhima, the hero with a mace who sired Ghatotkacha, who threatened to kill an entire army and forced Karna to use a single-use astral weapon.

This is a social thing.
Have you ever wondered, when listening to someone describe a caste system, why the lower castes don't just defect?

I mean if it sucks that much, you'd take any other ticket out of town, right? That's the "economically rational" thing to do.
Well, they couldn't when India was ruled by Hindus, but apparently 500,000 Dalits did just that after the British took over.

Only, they couldn't quite decide what to be next.

Identity is tricky like that.
Read 9 tweets
5 Oct 20
From the perspective of biology this is maladaptive, but 99% of you are really not ready to hear that.

#UnpopularOpinion
In #biology, anything that increases your odds of offspring is beneficial and anything that decreases it is maladaptive.

The paradigm of "not settling for less" means that most women high earners have a substantially decreased chance of getting married and having kids.
Note that this decreased chance comes about by a variety of mechanisms - time/energy commitment to the business as well as increased standards for men.

Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!