【 BREAKING 】@thetimes reports that 400+ academics have signed an open letter in solidarity with Dr Finley. The signatories criticise the political censorship of the Chinese Communist Party, which now jeopardises scholarly cooperation with China /1
Such global support for Dr Finley marks a decisive pushback against the CCP’s threat to academic freedom. In 2020 100+ scholars from 71 academic institutions across 16 countries had already signed another open letter condemning the HK security law /2
So what is happening here and what do we need to know? In an article for the International Journal of Human Rights @InRights (in peer review) David Missal @DavidJRMissal and I have pointed out that the CCP poses a serious threat to academic freedom at home and abroad /3
Under General Secretary Xi Jinping the Chinese Communist Party weaponised China's domestic academia through the party directives Seven Don’t Speaks & Doc No 9. Chinese academics never enjoyed much autonomy, but whatever they once had was taken away /4
In 2019 the CCP imposed changes on university charters such as "dropping the phrase 'freedom of thought' and the inclusion of a pledge to follow the Communist party’s leadership". The goal is a Gleichschaltung of Chinese academia by a unified narrative /5
Dr Elizabeth Perry has highlighted that "Chinese universities have introduced new regulations that encourage intellectuals to align their academic output even more closely with official priorities". This has led to enforced political compliance /6
Many academics whose voices were considered as political threats have been heavily sanctioned, often by terminating their employment contract, sometimes even by cancelling their right to pension and sometimes by long, arbitrary prison sentences /7
According to Dr Cai Xia, a former renowned professor at the Central Party School “over the course of (Xi Jinping’s) tenure, the regime has degenerated further into a political oligarchy bent on holding on to power through brutality and ruthlessness." /8
Beat Hotz-Hart has pointed out that "the authorities have started to influence the academic discussion also in other countries" under the pretext of defending the national sovereignty of China, which nowadays means defending the party-state /9
China's censorship regime has not stopped at its borders. In recent years numerous Western China specialists have been harassed, either for their critical scholarship, for publicly critiquing the CCP and its ill-guided party policies, or for both /10
Professor Anne-Marie Brady @Anne_MarieBrady became a prominent victim of the CCP's intimidation tactics following the publication of "her 2017 paper Magic Weapons, which details the extent of Chinese influence in New Zealand" /11
On 22 March Dr Adrian Zenz @adrianzenz & Dr Bjoern Jerdén @bjornjerden were singled out by the party-state in its disproportionate counter-sanctions following the Magnitsky sanctions by the EU, US, UK and Canada on Chinese officials /12
On 26 March Dr Jo Smith Finley @j_smithfinley was sanctioned by the Chinese party-state in retaliation for Dr Finley publicly speaking out against the "perpetration of crimes against humanity and the beginnings of a slow genocide" in Xinjiang /13
Dr Antoine Bondaz @AntoineBondaz, a China expert at the Paris-based Foundation for Strategic Research who had publicly defended French lawmaker's planned visit to Taiwan was insulted by the Chinese Embassy in France as a 'small-time thug' /14
The widely respected German China specialists Dr Mareike Ohlberg @MareikeOhlberg and Dr Kristin Shi-Kupfer @gusiting were attacked by the CCP mouthpiece Global Times as 'far-right', 'anti-China' and accused of '[defaming] China's human rights record' /15
I myself have experienced smear campaigns and cyber bullying for my research and commentary on the struggle for democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong. This non-exhaustive list of bullied China specialists shows the scale of the problem /16
In the following I would like to outline what 1) democratic governments, 2) universities, 3) learned societies, 4) China specialists as well as 5) laypersons with an interest in current Chinese affairs can do to better protect #AcademicFreedom and #FreedomOfSpeech /17
【 What governments can do 】
They should establish a whole-of-government task force which provides strategic guidance on issues ranging from academic freedom, industry cooptation, cyber attacks, disinformation campaigns, to threats against the Chinese diaspora etc /18
And while higher education (HE) is a public good, in the past few decades it has been hollowed out by financialisation and commercialisation. Governments need to sufficiently fund HE institutions and protect HE from the whims of market forces /19
And while in liberal democracies governments should not interfere in the self-government of universities, they also have a constitutional obligation to mitigate international threats to academic freedom. Universities should be reminded of their commitment to #AcademicFreedom /20
【 What universities can do 】
UK universities should swiftly implement the @UUKIntl guidelines 'Managing risks in Internationalisation: Security related issues'. The key task ahead will be to engage in #EthicalDueDiligence and #ReputationManagement /21
Universities worldwide should also heed the excellent advice of @GPPi and "apply the [Academic Freedom Index] to protect and promote academic freedom worldwide" /22
Scholars will need to discuss how to mitigate the CCP’s threat to China’s domestic and international academia. The @UniOfBuckingham conference "Academic freedom under threat" can be seen as a best practice example /23
Dr Teng Biao @tengbiao has called on western academics to reject self-censorship. With the signing of the open letter in defence of Dr Finley leading China specialists across the world have done exactly that /24
I would add that Western China scholars should continue to research *both* 'official China' (represented by the party-state) as well as 'unofficial China' (including academics, doctors, citizen journalists, and young students who no longer accept the CCP’s rule by fear) /25
The Chinese party-state has also lost much of its adaptive capabilities of the previous Hu/Wen era. Under Xi Jinping we have seen accelerated regime decay and pathological learning. This development towards atrophy needs to be better understood in contemporary Chinese studies /26
【 What laypersons can do 】
We can all educate ourselves about the dire human rights situation in Tibet, Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Hong Kong. And please share your insights with friends and colleagues. Together, we shall overcome /27
Last but not least I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude for the leadership by Dr Nick Megoran @NickMegoran, a political geographer at Newcastle University. He was the key author of the open letter. It is this kind of lived solidarity which makes academia worthwhile /End
"The CCP retaliated by sanctioning five MPs, lawyers and - what I find particularly galling - a British academic and Xinjiang expert, Dr Jo Smith Finley @j_smithfinley. She is a Reader in Chinese Studies at Newcastle University" - Andreas Fulda on @AlJazeera, 26 March 2021 /1
"Both sides now are in a double bind. The CCP will not back down ... but neither can western liberal democracies afford to give ground when it comes to dealing with what is effectively a genocide in Xinjiang. Right now I can't see an off ramp in terms of diplomacy." @AlJazeera /2
"What we've seen is an overreaction. Many commentators have noted that the counter-sanctions were disproportionate. They also not only targeted state actors but also civil society & academia. In Germany a very well respected think tank @merics_eu was put on the sanction list" /3
As scholars we have a shared responsibility to address the issue of domestic and international threats to #AcademicFreedom in the UK. @DavidJRMissal and I developed the following framework when discussing Germany's case in an article for the International Journal of Human Rights.
Good to see that the Academic Freedom and Internationalisation Working Group (AFIWG) has issued this statement.
This is getting ridiculous. Now the Chinese Communist Party is sanctioning nine individuals and four entities in the UK 🇬🇧 for their critique of the party-state’s crimes against humanity. Particularly galling is the singling out of fellow academic @j_smithfinley#AcademicFreedom
Here is the statement of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs h/t @MahmutRahima
The Chinese Communist Party “warns the UK side not go further down the wrong path”. Such bullying shows us what kind of regime we are dealing with. Time for the British state and British civil society to push back against the CCP’s authoritarian overreach. globaltimes.cn/page/202103/12…
In this German-language report @FriederikeBoege and @MichaelaWiegel write about the Chinese Communist Party's attempts to 'control the global narrative about China' with the help of 'defamation and intimidation' /1
This report is remarkable for various reasons. In the past there has been a great reluctance among German elites to pick a fight with the Chinese Communist Party. But now that the party-state has sanctioned the widely respected German think tank @merics_eu, things will change /2
As @FriederikeBoege and @MichaelaWiegel rightly point out, @merics_eu is hardly a hawkish think tank. Under @m_huotari's leadership it has gained a reputation of being both critical and constructive. Merics is widely respected, both within the German government and academia /3
The German Association for Asian Studies (DGA) can no longer hide behind it’s proclaimed ‘neutral’ position @feiduoli. The DGA has to address the Chinese Communist Party’s threat to #academicfreedom. We should stand in solidarity with @adrianzenz, @MareikeOhlberg and @gusiting /1
A learned society should address the threat which the CCP's political censorship poses to open-ended knowledge production. Yet in June 2020 the DGA board issued a controversial statement 'Beware the polarisation'. It's claim to 'neutrality' was widely criticised on Twitter /2
A German and English-language version of the DGA board's highly controversial statement 'Beware the polarisation' is available here /3 aktuell.asienforschung.de/ein-plaedoyer-…
Former German Chancellor Gerhard 'Gazprom' Schroeder has done it again. In a new German-language op-ed for @handelsblatt he argues against a value-based European China policy. What follows is a critique of his simplistic analysis of EU-China relations /1
He frames EU-China relations in opposition to the geopolitical rivalry between the US and China, which he likens to a new Cold War.
Schroeder argues for multipolarity, European sovereignty & demands that in future reforms EU member states renounce further sovereignty rights /2
When it comes to China he briefly mentions that Beijing has smashed Hong Kong's democracy movement and that religious and ethnic groups are being suppressed. He also recognises the expansionism in the South China Sea. Schroeder calls all of the above a 'controlled offensive' /3