1) I loved the people 2) I was continuously challenged and learning 3) The mission spoke to me 4) I felt deep loyalty
But there was another big reason that was hard for me to admit then...
(1/10)
The hard-to-admit reason was this: my sense of identity was deeply tied to my job.
I felt I *belonged* there.
I had a great career there.
I'd made many wonderful friends there.
And so, it was terrifying to imagine: who would I be if I *didn't* work there?
(2/10)
"My identity = My job" is a common thought pattern for folks (more likely founders or young) who...
1) have invested tons of time/capital/energy into the job 2) are ambitious 3) are recognized for their job 4) have mostly work friends 5) believe deeply in job's mission
(3/10)
"My identity = My job" can make you swell w/ pride, knowing you are a part of something bigger. It can spur you to achieve miracles. It can spin an intoxicating camaraderie.
Now, thinking of my 20s spent cranking 2am w/ Daft Punk, I am awash with nostalgia. I loved that time.
But. "My identity = My job" has a dark side:
1) You burn out prioritizing it over everything else 2) Your self-esteem is tied to your success, which you can't always control 3) You don't learn your own values 4) Your relationships skew superficial 5) You miss other oppts
(5/10)
In the end, "My identity = My job" is unsustainable. The sooner you can see yourself as more than your job, the happier you'll be.
On their deathbed, most people don't think: "I wish I'd gotten promoted to VP sooner," or "I really regret us not becoming a unicorn."
I wish I’d had the courage to live a life true to me.
I wish I hadn’t worked so hard
I wish I’d had expressed my feelings.
I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.
I wish that I had let myself be happier.
(7/10)
Of course the job matters. But it is not everything. What about...
1) Your relationships with family/friends/community
2) Your integrity, and whether your daily actions match your values
3) Your spirituality and connection to the larger world
(8/10)
As for me, I rode the highs and lows of "My identity = My job" for years. And the lows were painful.
But with time, I let more in. I became a wife, a mom, an author, a learner, an appreciator. I came to define myself more by what I love and value.
(9/10)
We are more than what we do or achieve in our jobs. And if it's hard to see that:
1) Remember "The Top 5 Regrets of the Dying" 2) Read "Designing your Life" and do the exercises 3) Spend time with people you really like
Fin. (10/10)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've participated in too many conversations about the role of design / pm / eng to count.
Of course there are differences.
But every tech manager role, regardless of discipline, ends up converging at higher levels.
What does this mean for you as a manager?
Thread below 👇
If you climb the management ladder to the very top, guess what? You’re the CEO. And you manage *every* function.
So if your goal is to be CEO someday, or even VP or director within your discipline, you need to get out of your box and learn how other disciplines work.
(2/9)
The most thoughtful designs don’t get used if engineering doesn't build them.
The most sophisticated algorithms don’t help people if they can't be put into a clear product.
The tightest roadmap doesn’t get you customers if the experience isn’t good, or you can't sell it.
Your launch date is in a week. Your whole team's credibility is riding on your collective ability to make it happen. Leadership is Eye-of-Sauron-ing this project.
There's just one problem.
You suspect the product sucks.
What do you do? A thread 👇 (1/9)
Prior to a launch, saying "Our product sucks" is not what your tired, overworked colleagues want to hear. But if you feel this way, you need to bring it up.
Align the team around the launch goals. Ask: "What are we aiming for?" Then frame your concern around that.
Ex... (2/9)
"We want to fail fast and get learnings asap" → Are we well set up to get new learnings if we already know so much is broken?
"We want to make a big splash and get tons of new users" → Will these new users retain if our product is buggy?
My co-founder Chandra Narayanan's quote has become something of a product-builder's mantra for us: Diagnose with data and treat with design.
There is so much packed into those sentences! Thread going deeper 👇 (1/15)
First: "diagnose with data." The job of data is to help you understand the ground truth of what is going on (with your product, user behavior, the market, etc.)
Typically, we humans run on intuition, a rudimentary kind of pattern-matching. This is insufficient in many cases.
Intuition works if you've studied something deeply (think Serena playing tennis.) But it does not serve you well in:
1) Making decisions for contexts you don't understand 2) Generalizing predictions at huge scale / complexity 3) Optimizing the impact of many tiny decisions
Who is doing art NFTs but in a Patreon / Substack-like way, with subscriptions? Because I'd love to invest in that :D
To expand, what I mean is that today many NFT marketplaces are about collecting the ONLY (or very limited) version of a piece of art, and hence prices can be super high for that. Some number of artists + collectors will benefit from that model, but I suspect a very small %.
A subscription-style model where one can say, "Hey I love Artist X, and now I can subscribe for, say, $30 a month and get an NFT of Artist X's art every month which I know is limited only to subscribers" would allow way more artists and fans to participate.