1/The message from @AmerMedicalAssn to “Stop Scope Creep” flags a signal in opposition to the lessons I gained from 24 years of care for persons experiencing homelessness.
2/I can imagine some specific tensions that do arise for generalist MDs like me if payers supplant us fully in favor of other clinicians - but a broadcast hashtag #StopScopeCreep runs smack into many other competing and serious problems
3/First: in my world of caring for persons experiencing homelessness, I have been teamed up with Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants and RNs whose training and life experience are absolutely crucial, and compensate for my limitations
4/For patients with high levels of adversity and trauma in life, often it is the physicians who have re-enacted aspects of trauma in health care: sometimes it requires a non-physician to engage, often with a nursing disciplinary background. That is our team by the way :
5/Pharmacists don’t “replace physicians” but there is a significant amount of guidance they do provide and medications that they do help manage in large health systems.
6/#scopecreep sometimes is necessary. After interviewing homeless care teams, I heard this: docs who work with patients who are homeless sometimes must take on nursing & social work labor, or the right and necessary things don’t move forward for the person in front of us!
7/I admire and appreciate @AmerMedicalAssn for much crucial work on multiple issues right now, including pain & opioids. However I think the matter of “Scope” needs some re-deliberation. Ask: What is the goal here and what do patients need and whose help do we need?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/Interviews with 41 persons tapered (⬇️>50% ) were open. The framework for assessing stigma allowed that it may include “societal-level conditions, cultural norms, & institutional policies that constrain the opportunities, resources, and wellbeing of the stigmatized”
3/Major finding: "Participants identified themselves as overlooked and negatively impacted by measures implemented during the pharmacovigilance period, including various tapering initiatives"
Yep, I've witnessed that.
1/I'm excited that Dr. @AjayManhapra is presenting on concerns about mandatory opioid taper for VA's MAT-VA journal club, based on our shared paper... he notes Human costs of mandatory and widespread opioid taper
2/He cites @BethDarnall as the best available study, noting that even when one offers the best support system, a significant % of patients do not have a reduction in pain or pain worsens.
3/In a way that will seem controversial, he proposes that opioid therapy is not exactly an analgesic. This is daily use of an addictive substance that offers relief, where only a minority develop addiction.
1/Nice viewpoint out today: "Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Benzodiazepines" -authors note risks of these drugs and their utility, in light of @US_FDA changing the label to highlight risks jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
2/FDA's revised warning will more thoroughly cover risks, and the authors endorse that "increased caution regarding benzodiazepine use is warranted; fewer benzodiazepine prescriptions are needed" ... with a careful stipulation...
3/Benzodiazepine risks needed to be highlighted, "However, when considered without an appropriate patient-centered context, this enhanced warning statement might lead to fewer appropriate prescriptions and unintended consequences" - this should echo what happened with opioids
“Why did so many physicians become Nazis?” – this new essay bears on us, the non-Nazi doctors. In short, “science” can be invoked by immoral agents, & science language can seduce us into societal plans that override our duties to individuals @tabletmag /1 tabletmag.com/sections/histo…
Germany was extreme, of course.
Over 50% of doctors joined the Nazi party. There, Jews, gays & disabled persons were designated a disease on the German “body”. Ridding Germany of them was seen as good science.
We need not project the US will follow that, ever /2
But the US & other nations have not been alien to an immoral use of science-based authority.
Germany’s Laws for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring were based on American laws, passed earlier. We should all know about Tuskegee
/3 cdc.gov/tuskegee/timel…
2/Opioid prescribing has ⬇️37% since its peak in 2011. Today, many agencies agree that “deprescribing” was not carried out in ways that consistently protected patients.
We ask “how can well-intended changes to care transpire in ways that are unsafe or harmful?”
3/De-implementation= “reducing or stopping practices that are ineffective, unproven, harmful, overused, or inappropriate”
With opioids, that could be not starting, stopping or reducing.For us, this does *not* reflect a commitment to opioid elimination from care.h/t @VPrasadMDMPH