THREAD: what comes next amid Russian pressure on Ukraine? The situation is pretty volatile and covered with fog of war. Still, certain important factors are visible. I’d try to elaborate.
1) I believe, that the main moving factor behind Russian pressure is the lack of water on occupied Crimea. With 85% dependency from Dnipro river, Crimean water reservoirs are dried out after 6 years of annexing. In cities, water supply is rationed. This summer will be terrible.
1.1) Zelensky wanted to give Russia water (essential for occupation) months ago, but abandoned this idea as he has realized this would be end of his presidency. So Russia plans to take water by force. Why do I think it is only about water, not about revival of “Novorossia”?
2) Novorossia project (capturing of every region of Ukraine between Kharkiv and Odesa, making Ukraine to a land country without any access to the sea) was Russia’s main objective in 2014-15. It has failed. It is not abandoned completely, but such an offensive would cost A LOT.
3) Putin’s tactic is always to scare the opponent and to act quickly. To claim wins, creating the new reality, and than to start to negotiate about legalizing these new facts, exploiting Western love for compromises on third party’s costs.
3.1) that is how he acted in Crimea - and that is why he has frozen his Donbas offensive and went to Minsk in order to save his positions. He is just much weaker than he wants to be seen. Every time he is in trouble, he attacks - but with an aim of a fast victorious Blitzkrieg.
4) I believe the current situation is the same. I think Putin will need a fast Speznaz takeover of the Canal Dnipro-Crimea. It is 65 km direct way and 110 km canal length. Russia will try to send airborne troops to take Dnipro dam in Nova Kakhovka under control. This is realistic
4.1) Technically, this is Crimea 2.0. After that, Putin will say it is “only about water” and “preventing humanitarian catastrophe”. And that all his troops (he has so openly brought to the border) would attack in a case, someone will try to stop his attempt to control water.
5) In this case, a mild respond to Russia’s seizure of canal would be a mistake. Despite of all bluffing, Putin is not ready for a war. His rating is very low. RU suffers from Covid and economy crisis. He has elections in Autumn. Russians welcome war only if fast and victorious.
6) So after all, this is (and will be) a huge test for the West and fir Ukraine. I believe, the best peace-strengthening action would be introducing of very hard sanctions now - against Russian companies and sectors (railways, transport, energy, banks) for the war preparations.
7)And of course, Nord Stream 2 should be stopped immediately. This would be the best option for peace. We may not wait until Russian helicopters full with troops land in Nova Kakhovka and Putin starts to negotiate from a much better position. We need to stop this madness now. END
PS Just for understanding: I do not deny an option of a large-scale Russian invasion (I think it has a probability of 25-39%), I just say, this option is not what Russia would prefer to have now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Kremlin spokesperson Peskov says, annexation of Donbas "is not on Russia's agenda", commenting the speech of Kremlin top propagandist Simonyan yesterday in Donbas (Simonyan urged for annexation). Let me explain, why this can be seen as a confirmation, not as a denial (Thread)
The joke "it is not true, as long as not denied by Kremlin" is actually not a joke. There are numerous examples of Kremlin "denials" that in the fact were confirmations. The most prominent one - several Putin's speeches as he said, Russia has not territorial claims vs Ukraine
Putin has confirmed many times, Russia and Ukraine have agreed on the border; Russia has no intentions to annex Crimea; or Russia has never sent any military personnel to Crimea or Donbas - the latter statements have been revoked by Putin himself later.
Very disturbing news from Russia-occupied Ukrainian Donbas region. A draft "law" is under consideration in "DNR", that would extremely discriminate Ukrainian citizens who live in the region (about 1.5m people). Those who will remain in possession of Ukrainian citizenship... (1/x)
(2/x) Those who will stay in possession of Ukrainian citizenship and will not abandon it for a "DNR" one, would be banned from ownership rights of any property, and banned from entrepreneurship activities. Moreover, they can be arrested up to 30 days "for needs of identification"
(3/3) The "law" is a clear copy-paste from Russia-occupied Georgian region of Abkhazia. The "law" foresees a "transfer period" until 2025. This can be interpreted as a way to pressure President Zelensky and force him to a sort of agreement on a "union" and "recognition" of "DNR".
Interesting, that Navalnys quote the famous cult final saying from the most chauvinist and imperialist Russian movie “Brat 2”, the movie Putin absolutely loves to quote as well, as this movie calls to kill U.S. Americans and Ukrainians and proclaims Russians a superior nation.
The moment from the film:
And here is another moment, one Putin loves to quote. The protagonist robes the "morally spoiled" American business person who is involved in sex trafficking and porno production with minors from Russia (hallo, QAnon!) :
Starting from today, Ukrainian business are obliged to provide services in Ukrainian in a case when a customer requests to get a such one. Sounds very logical, huh? Still, there are a lot of myths and anti-Ukrainian propaganda around this law. Let me try to explain (THREAD)
2/x Indeed, most of Ukrainians understand at least two languages: Ukrainian and Russian. Many of Ukrainians speak the third language: Tatar, Bulgarian, Greek, Polish, Hungarian etc. But in almost ever case when the discussion turns to the topic of language, one mentions Russian
3/x The speed of Russian language has at least 300 years old history. It was a history of prohibition of Ukrainian language (with short interruptions) and forced russification of Ukraine. Therefore, when one says, "Ukraine has always been bilingual", it is just not true.
(1/x) Good news about local elections in Ukraine: 1) Elections were free and democratic; 2) Democr. pro-European parties "Eur.Solidarity", "Holos" and "Syla Lyudei" are strong in many regions; 3) Syla Lyudei is a great example of a grassroot democratic party, free from oligarchs
(2/x) 4) Several important cities have secured strong pro-European pro-reform governance: first of all Lviv and Vinnytsya; 5) In Kyiv, Klychko will be re-elected. He is (as for me) a bad mayor (infrastructure, urbanist policy), but he is clearly not a pro-Russian guy or a radical
(3/x) 6) New "project parties" founded by oligarchs have suffered a total defeat. "Za Maibutne" by Kolomoisky has failed everywhere. This is a great sign; 7) The slogan "I am from the president's party, I have support of the president, therefore vote for me" does not work at all;
THREAD 1/x It is a very dangerous situation in Ukraine. 12 days before local elections President Zelensky publishes his video statement and says he pursues "a real democracy", so he will "ask people 5 simple questions" amid local elections. The questions will be announced later.
2/x Zelensky calls this initiative "a poll", not "a referendum" - obviously because there is no law on referendum in Ukraine in edition which Zelensky would be happy to see. This draft law did not pass the parliament. "A poll" also can to be organized just a few days in advance.
3/x Announcing "a poll" also allows Zelensky to interpret answers in any way he needs. "A poll" does not underly the laws and does not need to be controlled by the Election Commission.