1. Why do we allow police to be in unions? First, they cannot legally strike. Comp & work rules are by arbitration. Second, they are not workers in the classic sense. They carry the right to kill citizens based on their authority. They swear an oath to uphold the people's rights.
2. Would we tolerate the military forming a union? They are sworn to uphold the same rights but they are not paid overtime and don't have a union. IMO we need to pay police top salaries and end all overtime. Hire them as management and subject to review for advancement.
3. They should have rights to prevent arbitrary discipline and termination and have their discipline determined judicially like the military. But anyone carrying a firearm for "the state" needs to act like military members with no right to avoid daily responsibility for failings.
4. And when unions advise their members to tell a lie about their conduct, they should be considered accessories to the crime they are trying to cover. And before we hire a police officer they should pass a polygraph and psych screening to weed out sociopaths, racists & abusers.
5. Finally, because we make overtime a way to increase an officer's compensation we give an incentive to those who are willing to game the system. When they do, they are likely committing a crime. So the system recruits people into a criminal conspiracy. Give them a good salary
6. and attract better-qualified people to become law enforcement and these absurd violations of human rights will begin to decline. And yes, I am a union supporter and organized an @AFLCIO bargaining unit when I was 19. But I would not support a military union.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Hogan

Tim Hogan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimInHonolulu

13 Apr
1. When I was about 7, my dad taught me how to act if I got arrested. He was a person without ambiguity. He was also a police commissioner and knew that arrests are dangerous moments. Everyone plays a role in everyone going home. I looked at the video. Young black officer
2. was being civil but tipped the arrest without backup near him. The suspect was struggling just slightly and the arresting officer appeared to be communicating with him, I think he asked him to cooperate. Then he bolted. What followed was apparently an accidental shooting.
3. The officer who fired knew it was wrong. Why a young person would flee in that circumstance is unclear to me. I can imagine reasons but will wait to see what the investigation shows.

93, After my brother convicted officer Lozano of shooting an unarmed black motor cyclist
Read 6 tweets
9 Apr
1. Office of the Spokesperson
The below is attributable to Spokesperson Ned Price:

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke today with Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Teodoro Locsin, Jr. Both expressed their shared concerns with the
lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJI…
2. massing of PRC maritime militia vessels in the South China Sea, including at Whitsun Reef, and reiterated their calls on the PRC to abide by the 2016 arbitration ruling issued pursuant to the Law of the Sea Convention. Secretary Blinken also reaffirmed the
3. applicability of the 1951 U.S.-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty to the South China Sea. Secretary Blinken and Secretary Locsin welcomed enhanced bilateral and multilateral cooperation on the South China Sea. Secretary Blinken also discussed the
Read 4 tweets
8 Apr
1. Do you think Putin's crew knows about "The Trading with the Enemy Act?" It applies to nations and its nationals if the US is "at war" with the nation. It doesn't define "at war" as far as I can see. I searched for the term "at war." Found this is still in the books:
2. 25 U.S. Code § 128 Appropriations not paid to Indians at war with United States

None of the appropriations made for the Indian Service shall be paid to any band of Indians or any portion of any band while at war with the United States or with the white citizens of any of the
3. States or Territories. (Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 132, § 2, 18 Stat. 449.) law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/25…
Read 7 tweets
1 Apr
1. Kommersant tends to not openly engage in disinformation but it appears that may be changing. They are reporting the Sec Def readout
Минобороны Украины сообщило о гарантиях поддержки США при конфликте с Россией // Подробнее на сайте kommersant.ru/doc/4753396
2. to say that the US will go to war over a Russian attack on Ukraine. Here is the readout where Sec. Austin made clear he was reiterating "U.S. commitment to building the capacity of Ukraine's forces to defend more effectively against Russian aggression." Putin and the state
3. propaganda machine is trying to impact Russian perceptions to give the impression that war with the US is coming. This could be grooming the Russian public for a war or Putin's wagging the dog to divert public attention from Navalny, economic problems & the coming sanctions.
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
1. #Syria #SDF: Excerpt from Briefing with Acting Special Envoy for the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS John Godfrey On U.S. Participation in the Upcoming D-ISIS Ministerial.

state.gov/briefing-with-…
2. "On Syria, our partnership with the Syrian Democratic Forces remains strong. We continue to support them in the coalition’s fight against ISIS and the SDF continues to do great work in maintaining pressure against ISIS in the northeast part of the
3. country. We continue to closely monitor ISIS activity throughout the country and assess that ISIS has continued its efforts to regroup and carry out attacks in non-SDF-controlled areas – particularly, as one example, in the Badia desert.
Read 7 tweets
27 Mar
1. Why is Trump concerned about John Durham? First, his appointment violated DOJ regs that required he be unconnected to DOJ.

"The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government."

28 CFR 28 CFR § 600.3 - Qualifications of the Special Counsel.
2. As the US Attorney for CN he accepted an appointment that violated the law and on that grounds could be removed and investigated for an ethics violation. So why is everyone being quiet at DOJ @JudiciaryDems and in the Beltway echo chamber?
3. My guess is that Durham agreed to accept the unlawful appointment because he believed the keeping Trump placated was advancing the cause of Justice. Is he actually engaged in an investigation of Trump's Russian conspiracy in 2016? If he were that might be a reason to keep
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!