I don't know why so many people are laughing at this. Oh yes, wait, I think I may know... It's because they're not autistic, and they don't know how to deal with someone who is trying her level best to make a rational case for something, because logic isn't important to them.
It's like Mr Thompson, who led the marching band at my school. I told him I wanted to be in the band. He laughed and said I can't be in the band. I asked why. He said, as though I was asking a ridiculous thing, "Girls can't be in the band." I asked why. HE WOULD NOT TELL ME.
But sure, AUTISTIC people are the ones with the broken brains. π
The desire for logical, reasonable explanations is met with laughter by the Holy Wholesome Norrrmal People. Because logic is a deficit... or something.
Oh, and damn you to hell if you're six years old and hoping for logic, because you ain't getting any. You might as well smash a fish tank or stab the vinyl seats of a car with a fork and get the beating of your life so you'll learn to stop demanding sensible answers from people.
I mean, for her age, this kid is putting up a pretty good argument, right? She's trying to get what she wants in a reasoned, reasonable manner?
And the response is to film her and laugh, and put it on the Internet, and more people laugh at... the adult losing the argument, or...
Are they laughing because the child is trying to be taken seriously, but... they don't think children are human enough to be respected with serious answers, so it's now amusing to them that... this kid hasn't learned about ageism yet, and learned to just shut up?
Oh, and while we're here, I've been wondering about this since the start: Was this posted with the kid's informed consent? Because the 'informed' part means you need to explain what the responses could be if you shared it on social media. And the 'consent' part means permission.
Did you know that children can sue parents and others for sharing things without their permission, and that they can do it even when they are no longer children, for something posted, like, 12 years ago?
But of course that would be awkward, and that's how adults maintain leverage. I mean, are you reeeaaally going to sue your own mommmm who looooves you? Awww.
And this is why some of us have decided that love is too contaminated and prone to abuse, that we rather want to just fight for respect and justice.
Without respect and justice, love is just pain and confusion anyway.
I very seldom tell people that I love them.
My mother very seldom violated my boundaries when I was young. She read my diary twice, which was very upsetting.
Luckily it was only twice.
I live with my mother now and we get on very well. We like each other immensely.
My mother never laughed at me when I put up a good argument.
Also: Some people are not good at logical arguments and that's no crime. It's perfectly possible to be sensible without being able to explain your reasoning. A lot of anxious people and people with intellectual disabilities, for example, can't explain their reasoning.
It doesn't make them WRONG.
Sometimes we actually CAN explain our reasoning if people allow us the time. We should be able to ask for that time.
If your kid asks you a heck of a good question ("My friends went, why can't I go?") and your gut tells you that no matter how much she argues, your reason for denying her request is valid, then...
...tell her that although you're denying the request now without a good explanation, you promise to put some thought into how best to explain the thinking that led you to this decision, because you're not so good at doing that instantly.
I once had to explain to an autistic friend why a question he asked at a dinner party was inappropriate, and I was unable to do that immediately. I was twice his age, and it was so quick and intuitive to me that what he did wasn't OK, that it took some time to unravel the reason.
And don't forget that sometimes you will discover through contemplation, that your reason was actually not a good and valid one, and then you need to apologise TO THIS PERSON OVER WHOM YOU HOLD POWER.
Be prepared from the start to apologise if necessary.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Campaign starts TODAY: #AllowAACinTherapy. It's aimed at doctors, psychologists and other clinical professionals, and at the institutions that empower them to disempower disabled people. I have seriously had enough of this nonsense from them.
People with communication disabilities should not be expected to make appointments using a telephone. You should not have to register as a Deaf person to be allowed to use AAC.
When they speak about disabled children having "challenging behaviour", what does "challenging" mean? Why do they use THAT word? (Not a sarcastic question.) Do they believe that the child is "challenging" them like a drunk person in a bar challenges another guy to fight? Or what?
Or are they projecting the challenges (difficulties) they have in understanding or coping with a child's behaviour onto the child? Like "I'm out of money and it's a challenging situation to be in." So, the OTHER person, not the child, is the one feeling like it's a "challenge"?
There's a webinar coming up with a bunch of 'autism experts', about dealing with autistic children. A bevy of white guys presenting, incl. an autistic vet; and one brown man... And on the TOP of the list of topics is "challenging behaviour".
Some social skills could be explicitly taught so that people don't have to take so long to figure them out. Like this--this could be explicitly taught:
From my perspective, respect is a LOT more important than politeness. Politeness should stem from respect. And there are many times, I understand, that it is needed to just save your life, regardless of respect. It's used to de-escalate, and that's OK.
But...
It's been more than 5 years since this happened, and still there are schools in the USA and in other countries that won't allow nonspeaking autistic children the support they need to participate in class, even if their parents pay the aides themselves. autisticadvocacy.org/2016/05/a-voicβ¦
During those 5 years, several nonspeaking activists emerged who were once reliant on pointing to a letterboard, but who now communicate by typing independently, either from time to time or all the time.
Damon is a nonspeaking communication and education rights advocate.
Unlike the US, Canada has ratified the #CRPD. But that still doesn't mean that its provisions have been carried through and that autistic people now all have the support they need.
With appropriate therapy, most nonspeaking autistic people would be able to communicate using words. Depending on the extent of the disability, their ultimate mode(s) of communication could include pointing to a letterboard, typing, signing, partial speech, and other means.
So why DON'T most nonspeaking autistic people communicate in clear sentences like the one you're reading right now? I'm going to tell you one of the main reasons, and it's horrible.
In a country like the US, it's not because of lack of funding.
The government already funds therapy for autistic children.
This is the start of my 2021 #AutismAwarenessMonth thread. I hope I'll have the stamina to complete it before the end of April.
You may be wondering why I am not saying #AutismAcceptanceMonth, and that brings me to a content warning...
I'm going to talk a lot about ableism and ableist abuse.
There are also good parts to this story, events that have happened since the last #AutismAwareness Month, events that hold promise for our future. π
But we'll begin our tale on a grim day in history: 11 February 2005. π