Happy #SubfieldWednesday! Today we will be sharing a 🧵 on anatomical variability in the medial temporal lobe (MTL). MTL subregions vary in size and shape across individuals & these variations can make landmark identification and segmentation difficult
Today we will focus on the *most* consistent structure in the MTL: the hippocampal body. Most of our followers will be familiar with this canonical hippocampal body shape shown below in the coronal plane.
The shape is characterized by a consistent “C-shape” when viewed in the coronal plane. The C is formed by the cornu ammonus (CA) subfield on the lateral part of the hippocampal body.
A variation that is observed in healthy individuals is a more "narrow" or round-shape of the hippocampal body in the coronal plane. This variant is referred to as “malrotation” or “incomplete hippocampal inversion.”
Malrotation occurs more often in the left hemisphere than in the right, and it is usually accompanied by a very deep and vertically-oriented collateral sulcus (see below for examples).
In summary, the length of the hippocampal body in the vertical (sup/inf) and horizontal (med/lat) dimensions can vary across subjects (and across slices within a subject). Thus, subfield boundary definitions need to take these variations into account.
The Hippocampal Subfield Group has considered these variations when developing our harmonized protocol, so that the subfield boundaries are both valid and reliable across these anatomical variations.
Next week we will talk about anatomical variability in the hippocampal head—which is more prevalent than variations in the hippocampal body. See Ding & Van Hoesen, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 2015 for a sneak preview!
When you look at a textbook diagram hippocampus, one sees a series of subfields - DG, CA3, and CA1. All of these regions have specialized properties relative to one another. But it raises the question: within each region, are the cell types uniform?
CA1 pyramidal cells of the rodent brain, one of the most studied neuron types in the brain, provide a good starting point to answer this question from both structural and functional perspectives.
Is anyone planning to do some reading about hippocampal neuroanatomy over the holidays?
If you answered, "yes", this week's #SubfieldWednesday is for you! We will give you a list of "must read" atlas references about our favorite brain structure. 🍤❣️
Hello and happy #SubfieldWednesday! Today we are going to get a bit more familiar with how the hippocampal subfields differ in their composition of different cell types, cell sizes, and layer thickness. 🍤🔬
Here are some images taken from five different hippocampal subfields (CA1, CA2, CA3, dentate gyrus, and subiculum). Can you tell which number corresponds to which subfield? 🤔
Because a Nissl stain was applied to these slices, the cell bodies appear dark purple. This allows neuroanatomists to characterize the size, shape, and relative spacing of the cells.
This quiz even stumped some of us at @hipposubfields headquarters! We had to contact a neuroanatomist to confirm which answer is correct! (or at least "the most correct")
Braak and Braak (1985) originally described the transentorhinal cortex as a 'transition region between entorhinal cortex and temporal isocortex. This rules out answer A (part of ERC)