1. Yesterday, Indian State health officials said the double variant’s role cannot be ruled out in Maharashtra’s second wave. The state is recording over 50,000 new cases every day and has 5.64 lakh active cases, half of India’s Covid burden. indianexpress.com/article/cities…
2. The B.1.617 variant has two mutations, E484Q & L452R. Both separately found in many other variants, but together, it was found for the first time in India on 5 Oct 2020
Both mutations are found in the spike protein that helps the virus to bind to our cell’s receptors....
3. Together, the double mutation of B.1.617 is more infectious (spreads faster) & is deadlier as it evades antibodies.
However, is it really that this double whopper has been analysed with 13K samples? Lets access:
The sampling efficiency is defined by 1. Number 2. Rate
4. How efficient was India data reporting since 10th Jan 2020?
4.1. The number of genome sequencing samples:
Genomes = 7,778
Reported cases = 14,291,917
4.2. Rate of reporting:
% of cases sequenced & shared = 0.054 %
Median days to data deposition = 64 days (>2 months)
Source of Tweet 4:
GISAID website Last updated 16 April 2021 20:11hrs UTC
5. Infact despite this high surge, this sampling report is based only on 265 total samples, last submitted on the 3rd of April 2020.
Source: Outbreak.info
6. While most of the states, apart from Maharashtra, Karnataka, Andhra, Telangana & WB have not even sequenced more than 5 samples of the new variant in the entire state. The greyed states mean they have sampled less than 5.
7. When all the variants are combined, the sampling in the entire country was only 155 in the last 30 days- a consistent low from feb 20. See the surge in the double variant. Also a small portion 4% is unknown but its a lot given the sample size.
Data from the 60 & 30 days.
8. In comparison, respective data from
Country: UK & USA
Genomes shared: 368,740 & 292,415
Reported cases: 4,380,980 & 31,103,006
% of cases sequenced+shared: 8.42 & 0.94
Median days to deposition: 17 & 30
Very very large proportion. See the charts below
9. And compare the charts in tweet 8 with the chart below.
For a country leading with COVID-19, a dataset of 7K + genome sequencing is not even close to average. Again, to cure, we need to identify. And to identify, we need to increase genome surveillance.
Yesterday's report by @PriyankaPulla on the ANVISA decision of COVAXIN was heavily criticised suggesting the inactivation test was conducted and published by @BharatBiotech- contrary to ANVISA claim. However, the test was only ex-vivo. BB has not tested this in-vivo (rodents)..1n
...A 2nd step involving inoculation of amplified virus within in-vivo model followed by monitoring for the onset of disease symptoms should be performed. In the past, 2 inactivated vaccines, measles & respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) has had disastrous outcomes due to...2n
...the lack of appropriate testing for inactivation kinetics. Although COVAXIN is inactivated using beta-propiolactone & not formalin- like the other 2 vaccines, manufacturers need to practice immense precaution during development to avoid creating immuno-compromised people. 3n
1. In medical education, teach an extra course called PPD (personal & professional development) which includes medical ethics, difficult conversations about end of life, breaking bad news to family, inequality in health, conflicts & global crisis,etc...
... in my medical school in Sydney, PPD was taught interactively for two hours, about 4 times a semester. They learn about conflicts as an issue of public health. (Looking at IMA’s response to Lancet). My class discussed Rohingya. In ‘end of life’ session, nearly everyone cried
Sputnik V has 91.6% efficacy against COVID-19 & 100% against severe covid. 5 countries producing domestically incl. India & China. Aka GAM-COVID-Vac, it’s made of recombinant (S protein expressing gene of SARS-CoV2) adenovirus of 2 different serotypes (26 & 5)
Approved in India✅
PS it’s not Sputnik 5, it’s Sputnik V (the alphabet) probably a short to suggest it’s a viral vector vaccine. Sputnik 1 was also the first human-made satellite to orbit the earth.
Sputnik V is a double dose, 21 days apart vaccine. Both doses contain different serotypes of adenovirus. Single dose is not so effective (~85%). 2 way storage: 1. As a ready made water solution stored at -18•C OR 2. the freeze dried powder stored at 2-8•C & later mixed in water
PSA for those who have registered/about to get COVID-19 vaccine via the Co-WIN app.
It is absolutely essential that those who have had immune suppressants like chemotherapy or during organ transplants, etc should make it known during the inoculation and avoid the #Covaxin jab.
Q1: Is there a method to hypothesise the efficacy of COVAXIN when no data has been released?
Q2: How is this efficacy enhanced & measured?
Q3: Why can’t COVAXIN be compared with other mRNA vaccines like COVISHIELD (AstraZeneca), ModeRNA and Pfizer?
n1
We know that COVAXIN, also known as BBV152, is based on a tested technology which inactivates or weakens the whole virus, in this case, SARS-CoV-2. NIV isolated the virus strain (NIV-2020-770) of the coronavirus from a COVID-19 patient and sequenced its genome.
n2
The Lancet has NOT endorsed Covaxin. It has just published the phase I data -the preprint (non peer reviewed version) of which was available since last year. Good that @BharatBiotech published this data, but it does not mean it has a been cleared from the safety perspective.
Safety clearance requires testing in many many people of various groups. In this paper, 3 types different vaccines were tested in 100 people each and compared with 75 people of placebo.
In comparison, @pfizer released the data of its vaccine in the briefings with the @US_FDA as below