{Ad Hoc Judges Appointment Verdict}
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgement in a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari, seeking appointment of Additional Judges to High Courts under Article 224A of the Indian Constitution to reduce pendency of cases
#casedelay
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgement in a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari, seeking appointment of Additional Judges to High Courts under Article 224A of the Indian Constitution to reduce pendency of cases
#casedelay
CJI SA Bobde: Its a 64 paragraph judgment, We have held exactly what we discussed. Primarily we have held the process as per constitutional provision will resorted to but not in place of regular appointments. We have dealt with allowance and perks from the Consolidated Fund India
CJI: Its a case for continuing matter and so that fine-tuning can be done later on
We are listing after 4 months after law ministry files a progress report so that High courts do their job and Supreme Court knows whats happening
We are listing after 4 months after law ministry files a progress report so that High courts do their job and Supreme Court knows whats happening
Senior Adv Vikas Singh: Anything about regular appointments?
That is not the subject matter. We have held that it will not be instead of regular appointments
That is not the subject matter. We have held that it will not be instead of regular appointments
CJI SA Bobde led bench clarifies that the verdict in relation to the regular appointments will not be read out in open court since it needs further concurrence with his brother judges. (Matter pertaining to the timeline taken to process recommendations)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
