Jerry Jeudy - Solid rookie season and yet the fantasy community is not sold. ADP Face Planter. Bad Sophomore comps. Hard pass for me.
Henry Ruggs - Finished 4th on the Raiders in receiving behind Darren Waller and wunderkinds Nelson Agholor and HUNTER RENFROW.
But yeah, I guess it was Alabama holding him back in college.
Irv Smith Jr, the Tight End, out produced Devonta Smith that year. he had 710 receiving yards.
In two years in the NFL he has accumulated 676 yards. Total.
Noah Fant nearly had that as a rookie.
But Irv was held back by Kyle Rudolph's 367 and 334 yards the past two years. 🤷♂️
Josh Jacobs has gone on to be an effective 3 down back in the NFL... except for that whole pass catching thing they wont let him do.
But maybe that's just a Raiders thing, they draft players from Alabama and then refuse to give them the ball.
He had 166 receiving yards as a rookie and then 238 last year. For a combined 404 yards.
Jalen Richard had 461 over that span, so I guess Jacobs was just held back by superior players yet again. Funny these Alabama guys keep getting held back by their teammates wherever they go.
Im assuming Alabama Stan Trav (@skinzfantrav) was including Damien Harris in his 7 players drafted in the top 50...
In two years in the NFL Harris has accumulated.... 52 yards receiving.
Yup, really beginning to see why Devonta put up half the yardage that Jeudy did that year
Interesting to note that the ONE guy that truly dominated at a young age is Jerry Jeudy and so far is the only one of those 7 top 50 picks that has shown signs of life in the NFL in the receiving yards department.
It just dawned on me that the 7th top 50 pick was probably Najee Harris not Damien Harris which would make more sense
Except Najee accounted for 7 receiving yards
That is 9 less than Jalen Hurts (the backup Quarterback) had on the season
But maybe Najee held back Devonta
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the most interesting debates on fantasy twitter is the film vs analytics war that wages on year after year.
I think, for the most part, everyone can agree that neither side has all of the answers. So then the question becomes "how to meld them together?"
Let's Dive In.
I am certain that everyone has their own way of doing this but I thought I'd share mine. If you do it a different way please share! I am always looking for a better way to do things
Anyway, here it goes...
I start with analytics. Analytics is really good at figuring out who NOT to draft. Its not as good at figuring out who TO draft.
I essentially "cast my net" with analytics and then try to "fish within the net" with film.
So as you know by now, buying rookie face planters is typically a bad idea.
But what about at the NFL's most important position, Quarterback?
Let's dive in.
I use 1 qb adp because superflex startup adp doesnt go back very far. That means that good QB prospects can go in rounds 1-4 of dynasty rookie drafts. So I am not going to break it down that way for QB.
Instead we'll separate by first and second round NFL picks.
Here are the first round picks that face planted for ADP when comparing their startup ADP before and after their rookie years.
The other day I had said that buying face planting rookie WR's was a bad idea...
But what about RB's?!
Let's dive in.
This is a look at all of the rookie RB's that went in the first round of dynasty rookie drafts since 2007 that lost more than 12 spots in startup adp after their rookie year.
4/23 went on to hit a single top 12 season or more. 17%.
Historically this has not been a good bet to make. Don't make bad bets.