I was working my draft guide and was thinking about what would have had to have changed for Devonta in order for him to qualify as Bulletproof.

Let's Dive In.
He'd have had to have declared for the draft last year and not have been held back by the likes of Henry Ruggs in his age 19 season.

Here are the flaws.

Senior
Age 22 rookie
Age 20 breakout age
Consistent excellence (didnt hit enough production benchmarks)
So here are all of the first round Coinflips (because we are assuming he CANNOT qualify for Bulletproof).

But these are ONLY the ones that DOMINATED throughout college. So this would be if Devonta had not been held back by Henry Ruggs in his early years.
Ok, now ONLY looking at the guys that consistently dominated... let start filtering, this one is the seniors.
Ok, but what if Devonta was an early declare!?

That's slightly better. At least DT is on this list! far from a cure for the Devonta profile though.
Ok forget about that.

Devonta's breakout age was 20. Lets see how the age 20 breakouts did?

Eek.
But I guess if Devonta had consistent domination (which we are assuming in this example) that would make him an early breakout!

so lets flip it to age 18 and 19 breakouts.

hmmm.
ok, this is getting us nowhere fast. Lets change the game

Instead of assuming he consistently dominatd lets go with his actual production profile which actually still fits in the Coinflip tier

These are Coinflips that didnt produce as much as we'd have liked (just like Devonta)
Now with this production filter here is a look at the age 22 rookies, same as Devonta.

#notpretty
Ok, lets assume that Devonta was actually 21 and only look at those guys.

EEK.
Ok, lets remove the age filter and change it to seniors (what Devonta is).
Ok.... But lets now switch it to juniors and give Devonta the benefit of the doubt that he could have declared early last year and been a first round pick.
Ok, now we are removing the senior/junior filter and are tackling breakout age.

Here are the guys with an age 20 breakout age.
But Devonta *could* have broken out at 18 or 19 if he didnt play at Alabama so lets flip it to them.
Devonta would need to gain 30 pounds to qualify for alpha status, but lets presume that EVERYONE else's weight was inflated at the combine due to water weight and the only legitimate non-water inflated weight was Devonta's 166 pounds.
So our assumption is that he is closer to alpha than the weigh-ins would lead us to believe.

The Alphas tend to hit a lot when they hit in this range.
IF Devonta's 166 is in fact real, as is everyone else's weigh-in... Here are the Coinflip Betas

The hits tend to be one-hit wonders so far... And Calvin Ridley of course

I also thought I fixed it but it looks like his top 5 finish from last season is missing. Pretend its there
So like, Devonta would have been a much better prospect IF the following would have happened.

Henry Ruggs didnt hold him back from breaking out at 19.

He was an early declare

He dominated consistently

And he was an age 21 rookie...
If those would have happened... he'd have fit in this category:
So in summary, if he was a totally different prospect, he'd be a lot better prospect.

Until then, he will remain a Coinflip and no amount of configuring will change that.
If you are into a bunch of useless but fun analysis like this, I went through this with the patrons a month or two ago. 🤣

Sign up at Patreon.com/BulletproofFF if that's your jam.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew O.

Drew O. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DFBeanCounter

24 Apr
I talked about Amari Cooper on the podcast this week, but thought it would be fun to cover it here too.

Let me preface by saying Amari Cooper is one of the best 15 prospects we've seen in the past 20 years

But he hasnt exactly lived up to that billing

Commence Diving.
I put up this poll the other day and 49.2% of y'all think he's going to be a WR1 or better in 2021. Image
And I have to assume it is because of this torrid stretch to begin the season.

Through the first four weeks Amari Cooper was THE WR1 overall...

Dak Prescott just so happened to get injured in game 5 and Amari's season went off the rails thereafter. Image
Read 48 tweets
23 Apr
I updated my prospect process to "define" the process over the past several months

I imported the grades into my ADP trends database

I define a faceplanter as losing more than 12 spots in startup ADP from May to May per @DLFootball ADP

Here's the last few classes

Lets Dive In
2019 was a super weak class
2018 had some major star power.
Read 9 tweets
22 Apr
Lets quickly recap the 7 top 50 picks on that Alabama team and how exactly they've lived up to their draft billing:

Let's dive in.
Jerry Jeudy - Solid rookie season and yet the fantasy community is not sold. ADP Face Planter. Bad Sophomore comps. Hard pass for me.
Henry Ruggs - Finished 4th on the Raiders in receiving behind Darren Waller and wunderkinds Nelson Agholor and HUNTER RENFROW.

But yeah, I guess it was Alabama holding him back in college.
Read 10 tweets
29 Jan
One of the most interesting debates on fantasy twitter is the film vs analytics war that wages on year after year.

I think, for the most part, everyone can agree that neither side has all of the answers. So then the question becomes "how to meld them together?"

Let's Dive In.
I am certain that everyone has their own way of doing this but I thought I'd share mine. If you do it a different way please share! I am always looking for a better way to do things

Anyway, here it goes...
I start with analytics. Analytics is really good at figuring out who NOT to draft. Its not as good at figuring out who TO draft.

I essentially "cast my net" with analytics and then try to "fish within the net" with film.
Read 12 tweets
28 Jan
So as you know by now, buying rookie face planters is typically a bad idea.

But what about at the NFL's most important position, Quarterback?

Let's dive in.
I use 1 qb adp because superflex startup adp doesnt go back very far. That means that good QB prospects can go in rounds 1-4 of dynasty rookie drafts. So I am not going to break it down that way for QB.

Instead we'll separate by first and second round NFL picks.
Here are the first round picks that face planted for ADP when comparing their startup ADP before and after their rookie years.

This is based on using May as the cutoff month.
Read 11 tweets
27 Jan
The other day I had said that buying face planting rookie WR's was a bad idea...

But what about RB's?!

Let's dive in.
This is a look at all of the rookie RB's that went in the first round of dynasty rookie drafts since 2007 that lost more than 12 spots in startup adp after their rookie year.
4/23 went on to hit a single top 12 season or more. 17%.

Historically this has not been a good bet to make. Don't make bad bets.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!