Let's examine the absurdity of this action by the Liberals in more detail. #canlab #cdnpoli

Ottawa tables legislation to send striking Port of Montreal workers back on the job | CBC News cbc.ca/news/canada/mo…
The Liberals have now shown us enough of who they are to know that they are, at their core, fundamentally anti-union. Any pretext to the Labour Minister saying she would rather not do this, or that they respect collective bargaining is a straight-up fiction.
How do we know this? Well, this is now the second time the Liberals have done this. First in 2018 when @cupw was on rotating (ROTATING!) strike prior to the Christmas season. The Liberals really really didn't want to legislate these workers back to work...BUT
because of the serious danger to the Christmas retail season...or so the Liberals and business claimed (without any evidence), workers rights to bargain and to strike was expendable.
But, more than just recognizing the basic affront to workers Charter and statutory rights, the Liberals under Justin Trudeau have picked up the now tired playbook written by Louis St. Laurent, Pierre Trudeau, Mulroney, and Stephen Harper (to say nothing about the provinces)
Which claims to respect collective bargaining or the right to strike but because of a claimed "emergency" really does not respect the right to strike or to bargain.
Don't believe me? Quiz. Who said this: "We respect the principle of collective bargaining” [and
the legal] “institutions which have proved their value to the national economy of Canada,” [but we have] "no choice but to deal with what amounts to a national emergency"
Or who said this? I'll "be darned if we will now sit by and let the airline shut itself down. Under these circumstances at the present time, this is not what the economy needs and it is certainly not what the travelling public needs at this time of year."
"As much as there's a side of me that doesn't like to do this, I think these actions are essential to keep the airline flying and to make sure the two parties find some way through mediation-arbitration of resolving these disputes without having impacts on the Canadian public."
The answer to the first quote? Louis St. Laurent (1950). To the second quote? Stephen Harper (2012). Notice a pattern? It sounds exactly like the current labour minister's quote here:
Tassi called the legislation the gov's “least favoured option,” and that Ottawa believes in collective bargaining. However, the government must act when all other efforts” have failed, she wrote, saying the labour dispute has caused “significant economic harm to Canadians.”
And we could pull similar quotes from every single incident of back-to-work legislation since 1950. Gov. claims allegiance to the current system of industrial legality, but in reality, gov will intervene when the business demands it.
The action by the federal Liberals is an affront to free and fair collective bargaining. It is time we dropped the fiction that "they really don't want to do this." They always do this. And it is always at the behest of business. It rarely has to do with the 'public'
As Tassi claimed. It has EVERYTHING to do with the profit margins of shipping companies and the companies using the port. I would at least respect the Minister for admitting that. As it stands, our industrial relations system is broken because government routinely does this.
I agree with the workers and their unions on this: the action my the Labour Minister gives all the cards to employers. Just like Harper, Trudeau, Mulroney, Trudeau and St. Laurent. It is time we called it for what it is: straight up anti-worker; anti-union legislation.
Let's end this rant (SORRY) with a quote from Tommy Douglas, who as Premier of #skpoli, had this to say about the St. Laurent Liberals' usage of back-to-work legislation in 1950.
"The introduction of the principle of compulsory arbitration shows how far we have drifted from democratic procedures in Canada. Collective bargaining is now to be replaced by binding 150,000 workers to the decision of one individual from whose ruling there is no appeal."
"This may make the Employers’ Association and the Manufactures’ Association happy but it will cause great concern to those who believe in the democratic right of workers to bargain collectively"
It is our great collective failure that Douglas' words are as relevant a criticism of a Liberal government's actions in 2021 as they were in 1950. #canlab #cdnpoli #BackToWorkLegislation

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Smith

Charles Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfSmithSask

30 Apr
One of the things that the #Covid19 pandemic has highlighted for me is the role that class and class inequality plays in maintaining liberal capitalist societies like #cdnpoli. Workers are asked to sacrifice, workers are asked to do everything necessary to keep working.
And when they raise questions about work conditions, when they ask for sick benefits, when they question why they have to go to work and face the danger of the pandemic, they're told they're being selfish or threatening the economy. #canlab
They're told to go back to work or else it will be inconvenient for other, usually more privileged owners or workers. They're legislated back to work, they're placed in harm's way. And then, gov's refuse to bring in permanent support for these workers.
Read 6 tweets
28 Oct 20
On the #skpoli election, I have been doing a lot of reading, thinking, and reflecting today trying to decipher what happened and why the SK electorate once again went overwhelmingly to the conservative Sask Party. No easy answers here but a few thoughts: #SKVotes2020
1. The economy: there is a consistent trend in this province that economic stability and moderate growth is an economic success story.
The job numbers are relatively healthy and the close relationship that the SK Party maintains with large and small businesses in the province has helped a great deal in cementing their image that they're the best party to 'run' the economy.
Read 36 tweets
15 Oct 20
The thing I’ve never understood about the tax question is the relatively short term thinking on it. Obviously any government program will be paid for with a combination of taxes (business and personal); user fees; and other revenues (like crown profits) #SKDebate
So yes, all governments tax and spend. And if you cut now; you pay for other things later. Cut education and health care to balance your budget? Then prepare for health and crime issues to soar in the future, which lead to higher costs. You pay now or later.
So if im asked how I’m gonna pay for social spending; through taxes. Maybe some business increases, maybe from a progressive system that taxes wealth as its earned. Rising consumer taxes as the SK party did was a tax increase. Just a diff kind. Maybe royalty reviews.
Read 4 tweets
15 Oct 20
Just caught up on the debate and being as objective as I can: 1) Meili looked great, comfortable and on message. Granted that is a little easier as opposition, for a first time debater, there was no fear and he resonated with a comfortable relaxed performance. #skpoli #SKDebate
2) Moe looked less comfortable, but seemed to stay on script and certainly did stay on message. The adjective “strong” got a verbal workout today.
3) On the economy the Sask Party wants its job creation record to be the focus. While governments can’t take credit for all jobs, this record sounds impressive. But one has to question the job policies that led to this growth. Is it low business taxes and low minimum wage? If so
Read 9 tweets
21 Nov 19
Thoughts on back-to-work legislation: When right-wing governments demand back-to-work legislation, whose interests are they looking out for? Seriously, do Liberals and Conservatives think back-to-work solves the outstanding issues? #canlab
Today, the conservatives in #skpoli demanded back-to-work legislation. So did conservatives in Quebec. And conservatives in Ottawa. Liberals in Ontario and Nova Scotia and BC have used BTWL in the same manner.
Often when govs, legislate workers back to work the issues fester. Liberal and Conservative answers? Impose some sort of arbitration. Harper used final offer selection, which means that the arbitrator has to pick which sides final offer was the most workable
Read 7 tweets
22 Sep 19
Reading Adam King’s piece yesterday in The Conversation made be think about @BernieSanders’s workplace democracy plan and what a similar plan might look like in #cdnpoli berniesanders.com/en/issues/work…
@BernieSanders First, many of Bernie’s plans are uniquely American. #canlab does not have to worry about public medicare (already exists!) or right-to-work laws (don’t exist in #cdnpoli). Bernie’s plan is so radical in part because the situation for workers in the US is so bad.
@BernieSanders And some of Bernie's plan has been in place in #cdnpoli provs for decades: first contract arbitration; right of public workers to strike (#skpoli since 1944); banning replacement workers (#bcpoli & #qcpoli since 1990s); stopping companies from shifting ownership to avoid a union
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!