1/11: I was on a panel last week and was asked about a topic I knew very little about. My response seemed to get laughs and likes at the same time. It’s an old poker saying: “If you can’t spot the fish at the table then you’re the fish.” I live by this adage…let me explain👇
2/11: Poker isn’t a single game. It’s a class of card games that revolve around incomplete information, wagering, some luck and plenty of skill. I love many forms of poker and was a high stakes PLO specialist at one point. To me, the game is truly amazing.
3/11: But while luck does play a factor in any single hand, skilled players will emerge as winners over time. Being better than your opponents pays dividends over stretches of thousands of hands. A little edge compounds over time. A big edge can compound quickly.
4/11: One fun fact is that poker players have developed a common lexicon to describe their opponents. A player can be loose-passive or tight-aggressive. They can be a nit. They can be a river rat. They can be a calling station. They can be a shark. And they can be a fish.
5/11: A fish is a term used to describe a weak poker player at the table. A fish is an inexperienced or unskilled player who makes the wrong moves at the wrong times. A fish telegraphs their actions and the strength of their hands. A fish loses lots of pots.
6/11: So in poker, one of the first things you do when you sit down to play is size up your opponents. Who do you want to avoid? Who’s always holding the goods? Who splashes chips around like water? And most importantly, who’s the fish at the table?
7/11: While there are times that everyone at the table is equally skilled, this is rarely the case. “Passing dollars in a circle” is what poker players try to avoid at all costs. Playing in games where you have an edge is how you consistently win.
8/11: VC investing is no different because the asset class produces many more losing investments than winning investments. Only top quartile VC investors produce amazing returns. Finding and investing in the “right hand tail” companies isn’t just important. It’s everything.
9/11: So when I say I live by the adage “If you can’t spot the fish at the table then you’re the fish”, I mean that I only invest where I have an edge. I step away from companies that I don’t understand as well as or better than the top investors in the world.
10/11: By no means am I saying that generalists can’t produce top quartile returns. I can only speak for myself. Being selectively ignorant is my superpower. I know very little but what I know I know very deep. That’s my edge. That’s how I drive returns.
11/11: TL;DR: Feel free to choose your own adventure when it comes to “generating edge”. If you can be a pantomath - great. Being a “Jack of All Trades” might work as long as you avoid being “Master of None”. I’ve found “selective ignorance” to be my winning strategy!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frank Rotman

Frank Rotman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fintechjunkie

30 Apr
1/13: There’s a lot of chatter recently about #Fintechs not wanting to hire people with traditional #Banking backgrounds and traditional #Bankers pointing out how short-sighted this is. It’s a complex topic that’s worth unpacking. 👇 Image
2/13: Like with most arguments, there isn’t a right or a wrong side. Every company is unique and every hiring decision is the net result of a complex series of tradeoffs. Finding the perfect fit for any role is a noble goal to pursue but is unfortunately a fantasy standard IRL.
3/13: Banker Perspective: Fintechs don’t realize how the machinery works. They don’t appreciate how to navigate building products and delivering services in a highly regulated world. They should appreciate how many landmines could be avoided if they just hired experienced people.
Read 13 tweets
28 Apr
1/21: It’s not uncommon for a #VC to chat with an early stage #startup and within weeks get introduced to 3-4 other #startups tackling the same opportunity at the same time. When this happens it’s rarely coincidental and definitely worth paying attention to. A thread 👇:
2/21: It’s a generalizable truth that Startups attack market opportunities. Businesses sell products, deliver experiences and solve problems, and Startups attempt to deliver vastly superior products, experiences and solutions to those that currently exist in their markets.
3/21: A Startup is a simple beast at its core. A team is assembled to build a solution to a perceived problem with the goal of distributing and selling it such that economic value accrues to the provider of the solution. (Whew!)
Read 21 tweets
19 Apr
1/19: One of my favorite things about the #startup ecosystem is that best Founders are hungry to grow their own skills as quickly as they can. I’ve shared some hard-earned insights in past threads and thought it was time to share 7 more nuggets. 🧵👇👇👇
2/19: Nugget 1: Always find someone on the team to take the opposite position on an important decision. Doing this religiously trains the team to challenge each other and debate decisions in a professional manner.
3/19: By setting the expectation that all decisions will be challenged it shifts the group’s focus from an unhealthy mindset (i.e. – Is this a personal attack? Don’t they trust me?) to a healthy mindset (i.e. – This is how we bullet proof our decisions as a team.)
Read 19 tweets
13 Apr
1/20: Jamie Dimon. Love him or hate him it’s difficult to deny that he’s one of the most talented Bankers of our era. In his recent shareholder letter he points out what he perceives as an unfair playing field between Banks and Fintechs. A quick response to Jamie: Image
2/20: Dear Mr. Dimon. I read your recent shareholder letter (twice!) and have to admit that it’s a great read. I found myself agreeing with many critical points you made and positions you were taking, but I also found myself wanting to share a slightly different perspective.
3/20: Boiling the ocean, I think the main point that you’re making is that there should be an even playing field between players. It’s clear that you welcome sensible regulation and believe that everyone in the system benefits when the rule system is designed thoughtfully.
Read 20 tweets
8 Apr
1/22: The inflows of new participants to the stock market is impressive. Trading volumes are up and the % of everyday people holding stocks is on the rise. But there are signs that these new investors have non-traditional views about what owning a share of stock represents.👇
2/22: Instead of immediately delivering the punchline (which I’ll get to), here are two charts that when combined define the crux of the mental shift.

The first is a chart that shows the correlation of share price to earnings per share (Source: @awealthofcs):
3/22: This chart is strong proof that over time there’s a near perfect correlation between stock prices and earnings. Stock prices go up when earnings go up. Therefore, the enterprise value of a company ultimately collapses to a function of how much money it makes.
Read 22 tweets
8 Apr
1/5: Yesterday I put out a post about Investor Rights and it’s definitely been the catalyst for some interesting conversations. I appreciate the thoughtful perspectives on the topic and in full disclosure, my firm has been on both sides of the issue so I “get it”.
2/5: Based on some DMs that I’ve received and the dialogue that followed (with Investors who I respect immensely), I think a few additional points are worth pointing out:
3/5: Many downstream investors can’t add nearly as much value as some of the best Angel and Seed Investors out there. Not all investors are the same and therefore being “fair and equitable” means treating different investors differently.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!