This may be a very controversial idea. But, imagine if someone in non-covid times took a bunch of vials containing random materials, some possibly toxic and some benign, and went through a bar or food court, randomly sprinkling the contents into random unattended food or drinks.
Some people may get sick. Some may die. Some may be unaffected. Would that person be a criminal? Would they be culpable, not knowing for sure if they were exposing other people to things which might be harmful or not?
How is it different if someone goes to an event like this, with what should be full knowledge of potential exposure to a potentially lethal virus (given all the public health information made very publicly broadcast),
who then goes into the community and randomly exposes others to virus shed they may or may not have picked up at the rally?
If you knowingly open yourself to potential virus exposure and then proceed to go out and potentially pass that exposure on to others who are trying to keep safe, how culpable are you if others become infected, get sick, even die?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@AlbertaatNoon Not only do I not agree with the War Room going after a cartoon, I disagree with the premise of the War Room and how it is structured. Public money should never be going into a totally unaccountable entity. We have no way to know how our money is being used. 1/5
$30M is a lot of money. So is $12M. There are needs in society that could be addressed with this money. How do we know the War Room isn't just a funnel to move Albertans' money into offshore MLA accounts? We don't. They have no oversight, no FOIP, no accountability. 2/5
The War Room is a black box fighting enemies that, as far we know, are figments of the UCP imagination. If you put the future of the planet, and our children first, it makes no sense to look at those who want to save the environment as enemies. 3/5
Hey! Here's an idea. Instead of asking a stupid referendum question about equalization that won't have any meaningful impact b/c we still have to pay federal taxes, how about a referendum on calling a provincial election? Like, the day after the municipal elections in Oct? #ableg
Instead of wasting your referendum question on a bit of political theatre, I challenge the @UCP_HQ to ask Albertans if they want a provincial election. Right now. Right after the municipals. Polls in November. Do it. Or are you scared? #ableg#abpoli
It's a simple question: Would you like to have a provincial election immediately instead of waiting until 2023? Yes or no?
Most people agree on this. Some are concerned that two young lives have been cut short, while others grumble about how the courts will use mental illness or addiction to get the young man a light sentence. 2/15
We don't know anything about these people or their relationship, situations, or state of mind. But here are some facts:
I know people can't help how they look. But as RiverRising rightly points out, it was the CPC that made it all about appearance. So who does Erin O'Toole look like? Perhaps we can make a list... I'll start... 2/
Twitter is a pretty fair 21st Century approximation of the party lines from way back when... I remember my Mom getting really pissed off at a nosy neighbour who picked up the phone and listened in when it wasn't her household's ring... 1/
"Ok, I can hear you breathing, _____. This is a private call! Hang up now! No, not you Mother!" You didn't only peer through your curtains to know what your neighbours were doing. No, you could listen in on their calls...
And Twitter is a lot like that. People forget that, in the middle of a conversation, that anyone can "listen" in. And comment. There are people who just troll around Twitter, looking for people to attack. It's well beyond community gossip now though...
This is absolutely outrageous and turns our judicial process on its head. To begin with, it is based on the presumption of guilt. #AbLeg#abpoli 1/15
The Provincial Administrative Penalties Act in Alberta is really, really... via @YouTube
- 3 phases, beginning with drunk driving then expanding to cover all provincial legal jurisdiction
- Predicated on presumption of guilt
- Penalties will be implemented immediately and will continue, regardless of whether you appeal
2/15
- You have 7 days to appeal and you must pay a fee to appeal
- If you are poor, you can’t appeal
- If you don’t respond, they can come after you to collect any fine and/or surcharge
3/15