For a few months now I've been experimenting with microdoses of naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist
I'd like to unpack some of the benefits I've noticed and the most likely mechanisms through which it works
Naltrexone works through two primary mechanisms
1. antagonizing (inhibiting) the opioid receptors, most potently the mu opioid receptors which are responsible for the euphoria and pain relief from opiates and endorphins
2. inhibiting inflammation in the brain by blocking TLR4 receptors, TLR4 is involved in pain sensing and may play a role in mental issue like depression and brain fog, it's also upregulated during long term opiate addiction or chronic stress
Naltrexone has a secondary effect inhibiting the kappa opioid receptors, which mediate many aspects of trauma and negative conditions through their dysphoric effects when activated by dynorphin, which could be considered the "anti-endorphin" though it still produces analgesia
High doses of naltrexone either injected or taken orally are you super vent relapse in opiate and alcohol addiction because of their ability to inhibit the drugs' reward response
However, low doses, especially microdoses, have been found to produce very different effects
Most naltrexone pills on the market are dosed at 50mg, in comparison a microdose starts as low as 0.5 micrograms, aka 0.0005 milligrams
Doses are typically started as low as possible and titrated up over time
Everyone has an optimal dosage range, while lower or higher doses outside the range produce less beneficial effects
For individuals currently dependent on opiates, doses are typically limited to 20 micrograms max as anything higher may start to induce withdrawal
For individuals who haven't used opiates, dosages can stills start low but can range higher, often up to the 0.1-1 milligram range
Low dose naltrexone, as opposed to ULDN, is another dose protocol that uses the 1-4.5 milligram range, taken before bed to avoid side effects
The current theory as to how ULDN produces benefit is by causing a "rebound" effect, where endorphins are increased in response to a small % of the opioid receptors being blocked, ideally below the threshold of noticeable effect
TLR4 inhibition almost certainly plays a role as well by reducing inflammation
Pairing ULDN with opiates has also been shown to reduce changes in transcription associated with tolerance, likely by binding to a site called filamin A which regulates opioid receptor downregulation
An experimental opioid called PTI-609 is currently under development that also binds to filamin A, and in rodent studies so far it has been hailed as the first non-addictive opioid which does not produce tolerance, time will tell if this holds true in humans as well
Interestingly, microdoses of morphine were found to actually enhance pain signalling before the discovery of ULDN, suggesting that this paradoxical effect may be inherent to anything that activates or inhibits the opioid receptors
Now briefly I want to touch on my experience with ULDN:
I started using ULDN when I was still actively dependent on opiates and found something like a 10-20% increase in analgesia with reduced buildup of tolerance, it also noticeably relieved withdrawal making it easier to taper
I found that very low doses in the 1-5mcg per day range seemed to work best for me and produce the most noticeable effect without blocking the action of opioids
I've since been able to push the dose higher but I've still stayed below 20mcg as I still have sensitivity to it
The biggest benefit I've noticed personally has been the increase in endorphins and reducing in hypersensitivity to pain after long term opiate use
I find that I'm in a better mood waking up in the morning, and lifting weight feels more rewarding as well
ULDN and LDN have been suggested to treat IBS, multiple sclerosis, celiac disease, various autoimmune conditions, autism, chronic pain, and even HIV/AIDS
Obviously do your own research, as this is an off-label use and therefore not approved for any of these conditions explicitly
I hope you all found this thread interesting and insightful
Here's a link to a YouTube channel the shares a number of lectures about LDN for those interested: youtube.com/channel/UC6dQe…
I'll post a few of my favorite research papers on the subject below as well
The idea that cultures that use entheogens for the purpose of religious experience or enlightenment are not practicing "real spirituality" couldn't be further from the truth
All religion has roots in shamanism, it's only in more recent history that other religions have replaced shamanism with non-psychoactive sacraments
This is an excellent lecture that expands on this point:
There's nothing wrong with any religion, with or without the use of substances, all can provide genuine religious experience
The issue we're seeing in Western society is that because the experience of shamanism isn't available, it has been co-opted out as a tourist attraction
There's an interesting divergence between what allows humans to function better in the short term vs. the long term
We see decreased longevity with increase calorie consumption and more animal products, but better exercise performance and nutrient status at the same time
From an evolutionary fitness perspective optimal health only needs to extend up to or slightly beyond reproductive age, so even an ancestral diet isn't guaranteed to provide benefit far beyond that point
That said, there do seem to be some principles that overlap
For example, nutrient deficiency has been robustly linked to a variety of short and long term health issues and symptoms
I think it's best to target the basics like this first, then progress toward the goal of longevity/disease prevention from there
Carbohydrates aren't converted into fat unless they're consumed far above maintenance calories
That said, loading up glycogen stores can make it less likely that dietary fat will be used for energy as glycogen is the priority energy source
To put it simply: carbs and fat can both contribute to a caloric surplus which can result in weight gain either way, but of the two it is the dietary fat that's stored as it requires the least conversion
Processed carbs do still have several characteristics that make them more likely to cause caloric surplus in many cases
They are often found in overly palatable foods that are designed to be addictive, though in some cases (ie donuts) they are also combined with fat
Methyl-B12, betaine, and SAMe all increase methylation by providing methyl groups for reactions, with methyl-B12 being the least potent, and SAMe being the most
Niacin decreases methylation by depleting methyl groups from the liver during metabolism, and increases acetylation
Folate is especially interesting as it dynamically regulates methylation, acting as a cofactor for methylation reactions in normal concentrations, while decreasing methylation downstream of its activity at the folate receptor when taken at higher doses
B6 is required to clear methyl waste, aka homocysteine, allowing it to be metabolized into useful cysteine, sulfate, and taurine
B2 is a cofactor for the metabolism synthetic folic/folinic acid from plant foods and supplements
With the sheer amount of research like this that exists, dismissing the potential role of poor nutrition/nutrient deficiency in mental health issues seems insane to me
I've seen many that don't like this idea because they believe it places blame on the individual suffering
Really the opposite is true, the vast majority of people have at least some nutrient deficiency, our food is frequently low quality, and we aren't taught nutrition in school
Frankly I see this connection as one of the most hopeful findings for mental health in the last few decades, if anything it suggests that we have a remarkable amount of control over our own well-being