1/21: I was listening to the 20 Minute VC podcast w/@davidtisch as a guest. He threw out an important concept that most Founders don’t think about enough: “Is My Company A Top Half Performer?” This is a critical concept that’s worth unpacking: 👇👇👇
2/21: First, here’s a link to the 20 Minute VC podcast episode. It was a fun one to listen to and definitely one of the better interviews that Harry has recorded.

3/21: Now for the “Top Half Performer” concept.

It starts with the unfortunate truth that most #startups fail. And this truism even applies to #startups that have already passed a VC’s process. Even after careful curation and diligence most VC backed #startups fail.
4/21: This means that Fund returns are driven by the companies that succeed. A VC can only lose his/her basis on a failed investment but a near infinite return can be generated by investing in a generationally important startup. The power law is something to respect.
5/21: But what’s also true is that at the time a VC writes his/her first check into a startup, they believe that the investment they’re making will generate a spectacular return. The nature of the asset class is that VCs happen to be wrong most of the time.
6/21: A VC underwrites to the “what if everything goes right scenario” and then the distribution of outcomes plays out IRL. At best things “go right” about 25% of the time and “kind of sort of go right” about 25% of the time. The bottom 50% of outcomes are disastrous.
7/21: As a result, every VC can’t help but naturally categorize their investments into buckets based on how they’re evolving. On day 1 they’re all in the same bucket (amazing potential), but over time investment start to differentiate themselves from each other.
8/21: Just ask a VC whether a company is one of their top investments. They’ll spit out the answer before you’ve even finished asking the question. The concept that “I can love all my children equally” doesn’t hold in the VC world. It’s too easy to rank and pick.
9/21: The important concept that Founders should internalize is that these dynamics are immutable and drive VC behaviors. To predict how your Investors are going to behave you should figure out whether or not you’re one of their “top half” performers.
10/21: While VCs want all their companies to succeed, it isn’t possible to support them equally. There are choices a VC has to make that favor some companies at the inevitable expense of others. Their companies don’t see these choices being made but rest assured they are.
11/21: Capital: There’s only so much capital to be allocated in any given Fund. A typical Fund sets aside capital for follow-on rounds and successful VCs allocate these reserves carefully. If they can allocate 50% of the capital to their top 25% of companies they’re doing well.
12/21: The converse is true as well. If they can minimize the amount of capital allocated to the bottom 50% of their companies then they’re doing well. And when a VC asks their Partnership to support a follow-on check, guess what question is asked? Is this a top performer?
13/21: Fundraising: A startup and its Investors go on a pretty special journey together. It’s not always pleasant but it is “the stuff that stories are made of.” But guess what? Investors are promiscuous. They play the field and go on many journeys at the same time.
14/21: In fact, over their careers they’ll go on dozens of journeys, only one of which is with a particular startup. So guess what they value? Relationships with other Investors because they’re likely to encounter them elsewhere and elsewhen.
15/21: This means that the best Investors default into being “truth tellers”. Investors talk shop and are typically honest with each other. The last thing an Investor wants is to be known as “Honest John” or “Honest Jane” who says all their companies are amazing.
16/21: This isn’t universally true, but in tight ecosystems it is. In spaces where early stage Investors talk to the same down-stream Investors regularly, a common question to ask is: “Is this one of your best performing companies?”
17/21: And these same down-stream Investors routinely look for financial signaling from early stage Investors they know and trust. Are they following on? Are they doubling down or just committing to pro-rata? How committed are they?
18/21: Introductions: One of the most common requests that startups ask from their existing Investors is to open doors and make introductions. They want access to potential customers as well as to talent that can fill critical roles.
19/21: But guess what? A given Investor can only tap their resources so many times. When talent surfaces, guess where it gets pointed first? When intros need to be made to Corp Dev/Biz Dev groups, guess which intros get prioritized?
20/21: The list goes on and on about why it’s important to be in the “top half” of a VC’s portfolio and how it drives the various seen and unseen actions that a VC makes based on this categorization.
21/21: The TL;DR: While it may be awkward for a Founder to discuss this topic in the open with his/her major Investors, the insights that it will generate can be worth it. The discussions can be managed professionally and might even create stronger bonds on the other side!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frank Rotman

Frank Rotman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fintechjunkie

30 Apr
1/13: There’s a lot of chatter recently about #Fintechs not wanting to hire people with traditional #Banking backgrounds and traditional #Bankers pointing out how short-sighted this is. It’s a complex topic that’s worth unpacking. 👇 Image
2/13: Like with most arguments, there isn’t a right or a wrong side. Every company is unique and every hiring decision is the net result of a complex series of tradeoffs. Finding the perfect fit for any role is a noble goal to pursue but is unfortunately a fantasy standard IRL.
3/13: Banker Perspective: Fintechs don’t realize how the machinery works. They don’t appreciate how to navigate building products and delivering services in a highly regulated world. They should appreciate how many landmines could be avoided if they just hired experienced people.
Read 13 tweets
29 Apr
1/11: I was on a panel last week and was asked about a topic I knew very little about. My response seemed to get laughs and likes at the same time. It’s an old poker saying: “If you can’t spot the fish at the table then you’re the fish.” I live by this adage…let me explain👇
2/11: Poker isn’t a single game. It’s a class of card games that revolve around incomplete information, wagering, some luck and plenty of skill. I love many forms of poker and was a high stakes PLO specialist at one point. To me, the game is truly amazing.
3/11: But while luck does play a factor in any single hand, skilled players will emerge as winners over time. Being better than your opponents pays dividends over stretches of thousands of hands. A little edge compounds over time. A big edge can compound quickly.
Read 11 tweets
28 Apr
1/21: It’s not uncommon for a #VC to chat with an early stage #startup and within weeks get introduced to 3-4 other #startups tackling the same opportunity at the same time. When this happens it’s rarely coincidental and definitely worth paying attention to. A thread 👇:
2/21: It’s a generalizable truth that Startups attack market opportunities. Businesses sell products, deliver experiences and solve problems, and Startups attempt to deliver vastly superior products, experiences and solutions to those that currently exist in their markets.
3/21: A Startup is a simple beast at its core. A team is assembled to build a solution to a perceived problem with the goal of distributing and selling it such that economic value accrues to the provider of the solution. (Whew!)
Read 21 tweets
19 Apr
1/19: One of my favorite things about the #startup ecosystem is that best Founders are hungry to grow their own skills as quickly as they can. I’ve shared some hard-earned insights in past threads and thought it was time to share 7 more nuggets. 🧵👇👇👇
2/19: Nugget 1: Always find someone on the team to take the opposite position on an important decision. Doing this religiously trains the team to challenge each other and debate decisions in a professional manner.
3/19: By setting the expectation that all decisions will be challenged it shifts the group’s focus from an unhealthy mindset (i.e. – Is this a personal attack? Don’t they trust me?) to a healthy mindset (i.e. – This is how we bullet proof our decisions as a team.)
Read 19 tweets
13 Apr
1/20: Jamie Dimon. Love him or hate him it’s difficult to deny that he’s one of the most talented Bankers of our era. In his recent shareholder letter he points out what he perceives as an unfair playing field between Banks and Fintechs. A quick response to Jamie: Image
2/20: Dear Mr. Dimon. I read your recent shareholder letter (twice!) and have to admit that it’s a great read. I found myself agreeing with many critical points you made and positions you were taking, but I also found myself wanting to share a slightly different perspective.
3/20: Boiling the ocean, I think the main point that you’re making is that there should be an even playing field between players. It’s clear that you welcome sensible regulation and believe that everyone in the system benefits when the rule system is designed thoughtfully.
Read 20 tweets
8 Apr
1/22: The inflows of new participants to the stock market is impressive. Trading volumes are up and the % of everyday people holding stocks is on the rise. But there are signs that these new investors have non-traditional views about what owning a share of stock represents.👇
2/22: Instead of immediately delivering the punchline (which I’ll get to), here are two charts that when combined define the crux of the mental shift.

The first is a chart that shows the correlation of share price to earnings per share (Source: @awealthofcs):
3/22: This chart is strong proof that over time there’s a near perfect correlation between stock prices and earnings. Stock prices go up when earnings go up. Therefore, the enterprise value of a company ultimately collapses to a function of how much money it makes.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(