1/ @placeholdervc has always encouraged networks allowing people to earn the majority of a native cryptoasset, but liquidity mining has become a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
2/ Speaking with a team recently that’s building on a newer layer-1, they asked us if we, as an institution, *wouldn’t* stake.
Stating that in their ecosystem investors are foaming at the mouth to liquidity mine, but it’s clear those investors are short-term oriented.
3/ As @jmonegro has analogized, you wouldn’t take dividends from a company at the Series B stage, so why are we encouraging institutional investors to sap early rewards from the broader community?
4/ Early-on, people I respect encouraged this type of mining, and this is no swipe at them.
I believe they did it out of good intention, and experiments should be run, then learned from.
As is predictable at this stage of the market, the opportunists have perverted the idea.
5/ @placeholdervc is constantly debating where institutions should be involved in governance and earning, within cryptonetworks.
We now run a combination of optimistic and pessimistic exercises from #crypto's current perch.
People naturally asking, when's the top?
The truth: no one knows, exactly.
While we're in one predicted range at $2.5T in total #crypto value, the vibe from 2021 is supply inflation, speculation, and innovation. People saying, Up Only.
While $DOGE makes me queasy for what happens after this parabolic rise, there's a part of me that's also amused.
As the world gets increasingly automated, stripping humans of our meaning from work, we turn more to self-reflection (on the absurdity & wonder of life).
Different forms of art provide this self-reflection, and similar to @EpsilonTheory's recent post on #Bitcoin , $DOGE (with Elon's help) is making its own artistic statement on society.