Right now it’s murmured that “decentralized governance” slows down decision-making.
What if that’s a temporary truth?
Perhaps we haven’t standardized the right forms of “distributed governance” that accelerate group decision-making through flexible consensus rules.
Watching some of the boutique investment DAOs — which can out execute traditional investment firms due to lightweight gov structures 👀 — this distributed & accelerated decision-making is already possible in some contexts.
While “fair distribution” is a normative judgment, it flows from what we see as a consensus belief within crypto: creating level playing-fields where everyone has a chance at financial sovereignty.
If a small group of insiders regularly take ~half of the fully-diluted upside (which is common), we’re seriously kneecapping the redistributive effects of this technology in order to make a handful of people obscenely rich.