imagine a citizenry which places a "high premium on data analysis and empiricism". Or which believes that "science is a process, and not an institution". Or which expects data used by policy-makers to be analysable.
Such citizens have long been hated by climate "community",
Such citizens have long been hated by climate "community",
https://twitter.com/commieleejones/status/1391754136031477760
2/ the appropriate response of institutions should be to make the data available, improve their analytic and statistical skills, acknowledge errors graciously.
More or less the opposite strategy to the climate "community".
More or less the opposite strategy to the climate "community".
3/ we've also learned over past few years that institutions expect citizens to set aside their expectations of a "high premium on data analysis and empiricism" when it comes to diktats ("assessments") by intelligence community.
4/ The mantra of protecting "sources and methods" by intel community has far too much in common with academic community resistance to outsiders examining their data and methods. In both cases, institutions seem primarily concerned with concealing errors and stupidity
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
