Does anyone actually believe that @DTE_Energy and @ConsumersEnergy actually need "at least 5 years" to study and understand dual participation energy storage in Michigan?
I struggle to see this as anything more than a land grab and a way to limit investment/deployment. @FERC Orders 841/2222 make it very clear the goal for a new modern grid, and this type of feet dragging only hurts Michiganders.
(2/8)
We can't have it both ways!
More dynamic renewables mean that storage will be key to any large scale solar/wind deployment. The lack of that will just put a higher reliance on legacy utility-scale generation (i.e. Coal and Natural Gas)
(3/8)
I appreciate that the utilities called out @NewYorkISO for their hard work in sorting this out. That's a big reason @BlueprintPower is in NYS first. But to say "we still need to figure it out" seems very disingenuous. Talk to the other ISO/RTO who have lead the charge!
(4/8)
The same old "data privacy & security" trope is carted out for us all to see. @MichiganPSC started this process in 2016 and have established guidelines. If that is not enough, @DHSgov, @UL_Standards, and @NIST have provided ample support.
(5/8)
We have to demand more from the utilities than just telling us it's hard. Michigan has hovered near the bottom rankings of states with a resilient grid, and the situation is not improving as quickly as it should.
(6/8)
Providing stackable revenue streams and incentives for companies and folks to install storage to offset that resiliency issue only serves to make Michiganders safer and more productive.
(7/8)
I am stepping down from my soapbox, but reading the Case made my blood pressure rise. I am hopeful that the Federal and State authorities step in and do the right thing.
Our team had a lively discussion yesterday around @kubernetesio and the fallacy of innovation & ROI from tech. I am usually the curmudgeon old grey beard, but K8 is one of those stacks that just make sense. Let me explain...
(1/9)
The days before the containerised world, we sysadmins (remember when we were called that!?) had to deal with packaging and deployment in unique ways. Also, we had to monitor the systems to ensure uptime. This included networks, logging, firewall, monitoring, security, etc.
(2/9)
This gave birth to various interesting tools like Jails, VMware, Xen, Zones, z/VM, etc., to host the redundancy and abstraction and Syslog, SNMP, Nagios, NetFlow, etc. to keep it all online. There were whole suites for the deployment of patches and code.
I landed at @LGAairport yesterday and, for the first time, had a @Tesla@Uber Model 3 I was a bit surprised to see. We lived in Brooklyn and drove a Model 3, and I find the charging infrastructure to be incredibly difficult to deal with. Let alone on a fleet level.
(1/5)
From @plugshare, we can see that the only "true" (120kW+) SuperChargers in the NYC metro are in NJ or @JFKairport. If we lower the limit to 70kW, we get a few more options, but if we think that at 120kW, the bare minimum takes 2+ hours to go from 0-100%, it's daunting.
(2//5)
Which got me thinking, how do you drive an @Uber EV and deal with the NYC traffic flows. It wasn't like my driver was nursing the battery as he shuffled through traffic. When we parted ways, I saw him punch into GPS a charger though he was at 245 miles on the "tank."
In between calls, I decided to go split some wood. I find it incredibly relaxing, and it's a great workout. I was thinking about a conversation I had with a buddy about rural communities energy needs. It is a genuine issue in Michigan.
(1/6)
My "fun" activity of splitting wood is life & death for some communities here in Northern Michigan. I am incredibly fortunate that this a hobby and not required for my family's wellbeing. In all the discussions about energy, I find these communities often overlooked.
In my community, the average salary is 24k/yr. A geothermal install is unfathomable, and propane is at least more amicable to personal cash flow despite rising costs.
Those of you fascinated by the SR71 spy plane know that its retirement is considered part of space assets' proliferation. I found it interesting how @SenMarkKelly's question was answered about space capabilities and C2 during the United States Indo-Pacific Command hearing. (1/8)
I will post the video below, but here is the extract of the back and forth w/@INDOPACOM's Admiral Davidson:
Q: in Jan 2007, China conducted an anti-satellite test against one of their own non-operational weather satellites, with a kinetic kill vehicle.
(2/8)
A: We have to build resiliency into our space apparatus that happens with other space assets. It happens with creating airborne and other terrestrial alternatives to fulfil that. And it changes the calculus in space as well.