Making NIP work as it stands needs UK to either make big advances on implementation, or to fall back on dispute settlement mechanisms to test whether its more 'flexible' interpretation is viable (spoiler: almost certainly not)
2/
Finding an alternative sounds great, but it's not as if no one has been looking for such a thing for several years now.
NIP isn't great, but that doesn't mean it's not the least worst option.
And that's even before Q of whether either side want more negotiating fun
3/
And walking away isn't possible under norms of public international law without good cause, none of which obviously apply
So it'll be a legal nightmare
Plus all the immediate disruption on the border
4/
So Frost is right to say there are problems, but the path of least resistance remains the UK stepping up to its commitments and obligations under the NIP
As always
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
tl;dr for something that was to be so transformative, there's not actually much immediate change coming
1/
We can start by observing that what was the central question of British politics for the past 5 or more years finds itself shunted behind Covid (and various other things) to page 48 of the document
2/
Potentially the most important part of of the section is this, given its nebulous objectives and scope for longer-run change.
Note the focus on removing barriers (and, possibly, apostrophes), but also the lack of outputs so far, suggesting there aren't many easy wins
A propos not much, let's talk a bit about why trust matters so much to the EU in its relations with the UK
tl;dr without it, it's very hard to do anything
1/
I've talked a lot about trust over the past years of Brexit, mainly because it's a central part of all negotiating: it's the grease in the system that makes things run much more smoothly
2/
How to build trust is pretty simple, as I've sketched out below.
An apposite day to announce I'm going to be next @UACES chair
Moving out of @SurreyPolitics office, ahead of starting @OUPolitics in May, and remarking in what a big part of my professional career @UACES has been
Since I started by PhD @LSEEI in 1999, @UACES has been central to my work, first with @UACESgf colleagues and then with those working on euroscepticism, including the very excellent @NicholasStartin, whose shoes I will be trying to fill as Chair
But @UACES folk have been there since I was a student, with their numerous textbooks and research outputs, and the events so numerous that I gave up trying to count a bit before lunchtime