Here are my variants charts for data published on 13 May 2021

**cumulative** chart showing significant increase in B.1.617.2 (orange bold line)

...
Here is the same data on a log chart and including B.1.1.7 (top line)

**cumulative chart**

Significant increase in B.1.617.2 (orange bold line)
And here is the data on a heatmap. Variants of concern in bold/yellow

Very significant exponential-like growth. Clearly a concern given potential move to Step 3 on Monday.
Worth comparing with other variants of concern:

(ps B.1.324.1 with E484K appears to have been removed from VUIs.)

B.1.1.7 up 35% since last week
B.1.351 up 80% since last week
P.1 up 58% since last week (relatively small numbers)
B.1.617.2 up *150%* since last week
The risk assessment for the confidence in increased transmissibility of B.1.617.2 has changed from *medium* last week (when the decision was made to move to Step 3) to *high* this week.

A Number 10 press conference would tell us whether that has changed the Government's assessment of the *risk* of moving to Step 3 on Monday.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Duncan Robertson

Dr Duncan Robertson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Dr_D_Robertson

14 May
Chris Whitty has said that B.1.617.2 is *more* transmissible than B.1.1.7

(Number 10 press conference)
SAGE have now published their minutes from yesterday's meeting.

The key sentence is here

gov.uk/government/pub… Image
"It is therefore highly likely that this variant is more transmissible than B.1.1.7 (high confidence), and it is a realistic possibility that it is as much as 50% more transmissible. ...
Read 15 tweets
14 May
The JCVI were very aware of the potential issues with vaccine uptake.

Some quotes from me in the thread below.

Source documents: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
"At the end of last year, as JCVI set out their priorities for who should be vaccinated, the first priority was to vaccinate those most at risk of dying. A secondary priority –one that can be overlooked– included the possibility of vaccinating those at increased risk of exposure. Image
“Since then, we now know that Covid vaccines can reduce transmission. This is great news, and together with the lockdown, cases have fallen significantly.
Read 8 tweets
14 May
PHE have published a vaccine surveillance report.

Key chart here (colours represent level of confidence in the numbers, not effectiveness)

- Vaccines work (very high level of effectiveness)
- 2 doses better than one
- They're not perfect Image
Will be good to see effectiveness of 2nd dose of Oxford/AZ when the data is available, and the effectiveness of different vaccines against variants.
Here are the risk communication charts for:
1 dose of either (Pfizer/BioNTech or Oxford/AZ) vaccine Image
Read 7 tweets
12 May
A quick overview thread of case rates prior to moving to Step 3 on 17 May.

Overall cases in the UK are at 21 cases per 100,000. Image
Case rates are higher than they were last summer after the first wave and before that unlocking.

Some of this is increase is due to mass testing.

In late June last year, cases in all age groups were under 10 cases per 100,000 (except 80+ where they were 12 per 100,000). Image
Cases now are higher.

If we compare to the extreme situation in January (seen below), things don't look too bad. If we compare to June last year, cases do look relatively high. Image
Read 15 tweets
7 May
VARIANTS update for the UK from PHE data released today (delayed from yesterday due to the local elections).

P.1.617.2 declared a Variant of Concern (in orange bold on the charts). Significant increase in cases.

Cumulative charts that can be affected by surge testing etc.
Here is the data on an exponential chart.

P.1.617.2 declared a Variant of Concern (in orange bold on the charts). Significant increase in cases. This chart includes the B.1.1.7 'Kent' variant.

Cumulative charts that can be affected by surge testing etc.
Here is the data on a heatmap showing new cases detected each week. Variants of concern highlighted.

P.1.617.2 is around 4.4% of the variant cases.

This ratio was around 2.3% last week (which included all cases to that time recorded last week)
Read 21 tweets
6 May
There are several reasons why 'India' variants such as B.1.617.2 (in particular) are a concern.

A short thread.
The first is the growth of detected cases.

This is the data from last week. We were expecting this week's data at around 5pm today, but that was delayed, apparently due to the local elections.

Most of these cases were related to travellers. We have since required quarantine for people that have been in India. So this should (in theory) reduce significantly the import of B.1.617.2
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(