Centre has opposed the plea stating that construction currently ongoing in and around Rajpath, India Gate do not pertain to new parliament or new offices for govt but is wrt public amenities like new toilet blocks, parking spaces, pedestrian underpasses barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra makes submissions. Says that when plea was moved, concerns were raised about the health and safety of the workers at the site and people in Delhi
Luthra refers to statistics of COVID positivity rate, deaths when Court was moved on May 4
Luthra: Qn to be asked... is it too much for citizens to see misery, causation of death, to come to a constitutional court and seek protection for life?
"There can be no second opinion that preservation of human life is of paramount importance.. Article 21 casts an obligation on the State to preserve life...."
Luthra: When we came to your Lordships, we saw there was crumbling healthcare machinery... there was a curfew at the time and we came to court based on publicly available material...
Luthra: What is nature of DDMA orders we were relying upon? ...Finding there was a problem in health, the Delhi Disaster Management Authority comes out with an order on April 6... sudden increase in COVID cases, positivity rate... curfew.. except for essential services activities
Luthra: On April 15, they say again weekend curfew.. and they again limit it (exemption) to the same categories (essential public services, print, media etc.)
Luthra: There was a curfew imposed and everything had to be closed.. There were other orders, subsequently passed on April 25... May 1, May 9... What is most important that there is a limitation that construction will be onsite
Luthra: Suddenly we find very fascinating thing.. a letter is written..."permission to continue construction activities... construction work to Sharpoorji Paloonji... requested that Sharpoorji Paloonji may be allowed to continue activity... in view of stringent timeline of work"
Luthra adds that the letter sought permission to ferry the workers for the construction activity.
The word used is "buses" and the permission is sought by a "Rajiv Sharma", Luthra notes.
Luthra: This is their claim, Respondent 4 says that from May 1 they are not transporting workers and they have sought to resolve the matter. There are two news reports. For reasons best know to them, they have suppressed annexures...
Luthra: They accept that it is a limited challenge but choose to attack the messenger and the message is health, life, and safety, not only ours or theirs but everybody's.
Luthra: What does a citizen expect? Openness and honesty. What do they get? They shout it down ... Central Vista should no longer be called "Central Vista", it should now be called the Central fortress of death.
Luthra: Please see...There is no bed, there is no bedding, there is no person... My lord will see, empty tents on April 24. And they expect your lordships to believe this? ... contrast this with what R4 says.
Luthra reads the respondent's submission that about 400 workers were engaged by SPCPL initially, that some workers expressed willingness to stay back, that accommodation was made for them and that transportation was arranged etc.
Luthra says it is not factually after April 30, there was no ferrying of workers to the site.
Luthra reads UOI's submission that as of now there are about 280 workers on the site.
Luthra: As per your admission, from May 1 everything is in order... what happened between April 6-19 when you had no permission? From April 19-30? How many died, how many fell sick? How many tested? What has been the impact of residents in the locality?
Luthra refers to claims that work started on May 1, that all workers were insured. Luthra then refers to a document that says insurance period is from May 5, 2021 - May 4, 2022
Luthra: There was no insurance till May 5, 2021... And we are told that we have not done our homework?
Luthra refers to a report that quotes workers as having stated that workers have been coming every day
Luthra:..on May 7, workers are transported.. there is sewerage, MTNL, police... there are not only going to be workers on the site... all these people have to go back and forth
Luthra: What about their families? What about all of us living in Delhi... There are video reports...
Luthra: From May 4, there has only been attempt to question the petitioner, shout them down and to set up infrastructure. This is contrary to the disclosure required from a State If there was infrastructure, they should just tell us there is infrastructure.
Luthra reads judgment which states that the State should produce complete information, that no one needs to remind the state that they represent the collective will of the society etc.
Luthra refers to Supreme Court order in Suo Motu Covid matter in which court wanted governments not to target citizens who appeal for help through social media. Luthra concludes arguments
I cannot give an emotive response to Mr. Luthra. I will base my arguments on facts: Mehta
There is no argument that right to life is part of Article 21 of the Constitution: Mehta
There have been numerous challenges to the project. This court and Supreme Court considered it.
Supreme Court approved the project after it was vociferously argued for a number of days: Mehta
This construction has been going on since long. But there was nothing available for those who did not like project to come before the court in disguise: Mehta
Mehta reading out notification of April which did not prohibit any construction activity. Restaurants and many other activities were permitted then: Mehta.
Mehta says the photographs will certify that petitioner has resorted to suppression of facts. There is medical facility at the site and workers will have access to such medical facility which will otherwise not be available to such workers: Mehta.
Public interest is very selective in this case. They don't care about other workmen 2 or 3 km away: Mehta says referring to how petitioner has not objected to certain other projects.
They don't care about other workmen who are employed in other projects: Mehta
Everyone has right to criticise and be venemous but court cannot be platform to use terms like Auschwitz. It was
a concentration camp in Germany and such expressions are being used on this august platform: Mehta
The petitioners are conscious of Supreme Court judgement and are trying to override it though they try to appear goody goody and say they are not: Singh
Once petitioner came to know the workers are staying on site and not being transported, they would have withdrawn the petition, but they have not: Singh
We must overcome this jolt which is given by pandemic. We will celebrate Republic Day. My learned friend ridiculed word celebration. We cant make a mockery of our celebration: Singh
Half of Rajpath is dug up. If water is allowed to fill up during rainy season the areas adjacent areas will fall into pit. We cant delay it if we want to celebrate Republic Day parade: Singh
But they have resorted to shooting the messenger. This has become a consistent approach - to attack the petitioner when they find no other traction: Luthra.
The court said that health infrastructure is absolutely insufficient in city areas to
meet the requirement of city population & the rural areas
the Community Health Centres are virtually lacking in
respect of life saving gadgets.
#MadrasHighCourt extends life of interim orders until June 30, 2021, in view of the present #COVID19 situation.
Interim orders subsisting on April 30 stand extended till June 30 unless vacated/modified/unless specifically dealt with by judicial order to the contrary.
Orders of eviction, dispossession, demolition that have not been executed till date shall remain in abeyance till June 30, 2021, unless the stay is expressly vacated or the order of stay expressly modified by any judicial order passed by an appropriate forum.
All orders passed by criminal courts - including bail, parole, anticipatory bail orders for a limited period & likely to expire on or before June 30, shall stand extended till June 30 (subject to any orders passed to deal with any abuse of order)
Senior Adv V Prakash makes submissions in matters pertaining to workmen of automobile manufacturing plants and exemption of industries during COVID lockdown.