The recent change in @CDCgov policy regarding masking has prompted a lot of people to ask: do #COVID19 #vaccines block transmission of the virus to others? Here is a 🧵using slides my colleagues and I put together recently. @DrJRMarcelin @ElizabethRBrow2
Slides made by me (Harvard), Audrey Pettifor (UNC), Jasmine Marcelin (UNMC), and Holly Janes and Elizabeth Brown at the Hutch.
It seems like there is new data every day, so apologies if our slides are already missing something. But here is a summary of some good observational studies on the topic.
Same with the trial data - constantly evolving. Here's a sample. VE means vaccine efficacy
This question comes up a lot - a little data showing that asymptomatic infections can have a decent amount of viral shedding
Might be simple for some, but it helps to remember how easily observational studies can be misinterpreted
Another common mistake in observational studies
Measuring viral kinetics is extremely challenging - the frequency of testing is a huge factor in accuracy
This is may be the most relevant point recently. We still don't know very much about transmission events following breakthrough infections.
How is this all relevant to the masking policies? The point here is that we know that vaccines block asymptomatic infection, at least partially. But we don't know a lot about how much forward transmission can occur in the setting of breakthrough infections.
This data may not always be so important! If everyone is vaccinated, then it's not a big deal. We're all protected against symptomatic disease. And if there's extremely low amounts of virus circulating, it also may not be a big deal.
When this data really matters is when there is partial vaccination and moderate amounts of circulating virus. That's when we really need to accurately understand the risk of transmission following breakthrough infections. And we don't have that data yet.
This study reminds me of the above limitation. They looked at incidence rates among non-vaccinated pts at the same time that general incidence rates were dropping. Of course vaccines are amazing, but not sure how robust the findings are here.@walidgellad
nytimes.com/2021/05/19/hea…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Katy Stephenson, MD, MPH

Katy Stephenson, MD, MPH Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @k_stephensonMD

9 Mar
Thanks to @Anna_Rothschild and @FiveThirtyEight for having me on PODCAST-19 to discuss the future of #COVID19 #vaccines as we enter new phases of this pandemic. What an honor to be joined by @JuliaLMarcus! My main point is that I think there are ... 1/5
fivethirtyeight.com/features/turni…
two types of vaccines. First there are 'pandemic' vaccines, which is what we have now - excellent at preventing hospitalizations and deaths and most useful for decompressing our health care infrastructure and reducing mortality in the most vulnerable. These vaccines will ... 2/5
have the biggest impact on returning to normal, so to speak, where schools, restaurants and workplaces can open up again. The second type of vaccines are 'maintenance' vaccines which are going to come as boosters or 2.0 versions optimized for new variants....3/5
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov 20
Hi friends! Today's news about the NIH-Moderna #COVID19 #vaccine is astonishingly good. I've never seen my colleagues - weathered, skeptical professor types - so giddy and delighted and surprised. Here's a thread about what it means (and doesn't): 🧵 1/n
There are caveats and I will get to them (wear a mask!), but for a moment let's look at the amazing numbers they reported: there were 95 cases of COVID-19 so far and *90* of those cases were in the group that got the fake (placebo) group. Only 5 cases were in the vaccine ... 2/14
group. The vaccine also seemed to protect against severe disease. There were 11 cases of severe COVID-19 in the placebo group and 0 cases in the vaccine group. 🤩 Wow!
So now, other things to know: ... 3/14
Read 14 tweets
9 Nov 20
What do you need to know about the #COVID19 #vaccine news today? Here's a quick explainer 🧵. First, this is very, very good news! The first data from the first vaccine tested (Pfizer) is extremely encouraging. There was never a guarantee that any of these vaccines ... 1/8
could actually protect against COVID-19 - it was totally unknown. Now, we know it’s possible.
What else do you need to know?
- This vaccine will not be up for emergency approval until there is 2 months of safety data collected. They should hit that mark after Thanksgiving... 2/8
- All we know so far is that 2 shots of this vaccine will prevent disease in 90% of people vaccinated in the first month or so after vaccination. We do not know anything about whether that protection disappears immediately or is durable or needs to be boosted. ..3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(