$LMND's LTV/CAC is trending in the right direction. This chart shows 1.4x LTV/CAC in the MRQ. The second series shows the *growth* in IFP over the LTM per dollar of ad spend in the same period (~70% of S&M as a proxy):
Here are the inputs. The company released annual dollar retention data with earnings. 81% in Q1 2021, of which 7 points were upsells, so let's say 74% retention. That means 26% yearly churn, or an LTV of 3.8 years. Gross margins are about 20% but will see upward pressure...
...from two sources: first, life insurance, which flows thru at 100% since it's not an owned policy, just commission. Second, a reduction in reinsurance over time as the company proves out its underwriting and keeps more of the economics. I'm using 25%. Note that...
...at the time of the IPO the company said this could go as high as 35%.
Long term model: If we assume best-in-class expense ratio of 15% at scale (similar to GEICO) and loss ratio of 70%, that means a combined ratio of 85%, for an operating margin of 15%.
Today: 1.1m customers @ $230 premium per customer
In a decade? We can model this...
...out with various growth scenarios. Let's assume we agree on 8.4m customers, $1,147 premium per customer = $9.6 billion of IFP, $1.4 bn of operating income, $1.1 bn of earnings. At 20x plus net cash = $28 bn market cap or ~18% IRR from here.
Disclaimer: do your own work...
...and don't rely on this as it's not financial advice of any kind. I'm merely sharing this so that folks can poke holes in it.
(But before you post a short report please understand the difference between a security hole and customers sharing their quotes 😉)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For anyone trying to understand Lemonade's story, here's what I recommend. Start with the slim book on the founding of the company ($LMND): amazon.com/Making-Lemonad…
Here's a narrative on the bear case for $LMND. I'm sharing it with the permission of the anonymous analyst in my DMs. The main questions include: can LMND really achieve the 17% operating margin target by @tebixby, which would mean lower expense ratios than the giants? 🧵
Here is what this analyst wrote:
----------------------------------
So let's be clear and distinguish between expense ratio (that's admin, marketing stuff) and the loss ratio (that's the actual insurance loss)
and lets talk specifically about auto.
So in auto the expense ratio leader is Geico.
Progressive is trying to catch up.
Roughly speaking Geico's fixed expenses are about 10% of premiums and then there is about 6%-8% of customer acquisition/growth spend.
I've never heard a politician who had me smiling and nodding the whole time. Some reasons why:
Suarez says he's talking to local universities as well as courting engineering schools (including Stanford) to open campuses in the state and increase STEM graduates🏆
He understands that taxes don't create wealth. Rather, it's free enterprise and human ingenuity that do. In short, technological progress. It was the industrial revolution--many waves of it--that painted this picture of exponential wealth:
Lemonade $LMND LTV/CAC calculation. First, let's look at TTM LTV and gross profit per customer. Gross profit margin is running ~18-20%. I'm assuming ~70% of S&M spend for advertising:
Also interesting to look at in-force premium growth on a TTM basis, and how many dollars of IFP growth the company got out of every dollar of ad spend ($1.76 in latest quarter):
LTV/CAC calc: assume 20% gross profit margin (IPO video says eventually 35%!), $213 of premium per year, 7.7 year lifetime = $327 of lifetime GP which / $150 of CAC = 2.2x