Wonderful thread, and I'll add a little of what I know. Uber and Ola allowed anyone to become a taxi driver. The medallions in New York were given to a few people only, so the price of it was absolutely huge. Uber ensured anyone could drive. But there's a catch.
You couldn't "flag down" an Uber. A car couldn't put a sign saying "we're available" - and you just get in. Because that activity was licensed. And licenses were limited.
The answer was the app; book on the app, and Uber finds a cab hanging around close to you.
This was skirting of a regulation and suddenly allowed anyone to offer taxi services. In anticipation, people would drive to high-demand locations in order to service the location. Traffic would actually INCREASE, because supply had to be greater than demand.
Put another way, if you didn't find an Uber quickly, you'd ditch the app. So Uber needed to promote more "empty" cabs in each location so there was enough availability - and supply had to be greater than demand in normal times.
The very reason medallions were introduced was because, in 1930, taxicab supply was greater than demand, and cab drivers were working longer and didn't have enough money etc. It was a regulation brought for a market that was otherwise free, to help promote profit.
But like all regulations, it refused to die or adapt. The limit remained even as New York grew, and medallions then became valuable because now demand was greater than supply.
Uber's entry was to circumvent that regulation, but forgot to address the problem.
Which was that oversupply will hurt the drivers. It eventually did, and Uber has been (or will be) forced to recognize the drivers as employees just so that they don't overwork them and to eventually restrict supply.
It's not like Uber isn't awesome as a service. The technology increased supply, changed the game for intracity travel, and financed high profits (initially) for drivers with low prices for customers, largely because of lots of money.
But regulation will flare up eventually.
Add to this: In India, taxis are also licensed. Strangely sometimes. Like I think Mumbai taxis are licensed by the vehicle (not the driver) which is why you have artefacts from the 1900s as black-and-yellows in Mumbai
India's jugaad was the "All India Permit".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Do you have credit card debt that you don't pay back in full every month?
If you voted Yes for the above: Do you know right now, that every single purchase from day 1 of purchase, attracts interest at 3%+ per month?
Snapshot at 2:30pm: Appears that many people who "revolve" are not aware of this massive dirty behaviour by card companies. I will elaborate on this thread:
Groww buys Indiabulls MF - for a 100 cr. in cash+75 cr. in I-Don't-Know-What. This is getting really interesting!
This is likely to take time, because SEBI will go through similar process to approve a buyer as it will for a sponsor of a mutual fund. It's however a good thing. We need to get new faces. (Disclosure: Capitalmind has applied too)
Note: These figures quoted like 27% of AUM etc. are pure bullshit. Indiabulls is just about getting its money back. It has invested Rs. 170 cr. in the AMC.
The RBI policy was not much of a change today. They said banks can restructure MSME and individual loans. This just means evergreening, because banks are simply NOT reducing rates even for stressed borrowers.
If you're in trouble, banks can now say okay we'll stretch your loan for longer time. This also they don't do unless you actually default. Then, they don't cut the interest rate - even if their own borrowing costs are down.
You actually want more banks to come in now. Who don't have the legacy and who'll take over the market by offering lower rates, starting with good borrowers. So to fight, everyone will have to cut rates. You need the competition now, can't be a diktat.
Retail individual investors are the biggest player in our markets. Not FIIs, and not mutual funds. Look at the equity market (non derivative). (Thread)
45% of India's stock market volumes are from retail investors. Up from 33% in 2016.
FIIs went from 23% down to 11%. Domestic institutions at 7%.
And look at the index futures market:
Individuals do 39% of index futures. FIIs merely 15%.
Domestic institutions are 1% - Rest is mostly prop books of brokers.
In index options, prop books dominate at 39%, but retail's gone up from 22% to 32%. FIIs only 16%.
From the economic survey: India's debt situation isn't that horrible. Total debt, which includes debt taken from abroad, is about 122% of GDP - where government debt is 70%. Remember this - because most other countries have hiher govt debt and much higher private debt.
If Covid has hit us badly - and it has, even if markets are like what is wrong with you Deepak - we will recover the fastest. It's just math, though - just getting back from a steeper fall is a higher rate.