2/ What are the Weber and Rinne tests used to help identify?
3/ The answer is both! Remember that the most useful exams are hypothesis-driven so you need to do a history to begin suspecting if a patient has either type of hearing loss. This will help you generate a pre-test probability for disease (this will become relevant later).
4/ When doing these tests, which tuning fork should you use?
5/ The answer is 512 Hz (although 256 Hz might actually be better for the Rinne)!
6/ Now let's figure out how to do the Weber. After you tap the tuning fork on a hard surface, put the it on the top of the patient's head.
7/ Let's focus on the Rinne. Test bone conduction (BC) by tapping on the tuning fork and placing the base on the mastoid process. For air conduction (AC), the tuning fork should be in the position relative to the ear as shown below. Test BC then test AC. Normally, AC > BC.
8/ It is best if you start with the Weber and the proceed to the Rinne.
Here is a wonderful table from Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis 4th edition by Steven McGee that helps you tease out the possible pathology.
9/ Let's take a patient where have an intermediate (50% pre-test probability) that the patient has sensorineural hearing loss. You then do the following tests and get these results.
Weber - louder in the LEFT ear
Rinne - AC > BC in BOTH ears
What is the likely pathology?
10/ Another great table from the same book goes over the sensitivities, specificity, and LRs of particular findings.
11/ So we have a 50% pre-test probability of sensorineural hearing loss and a test that has an LR of 2.7. Let's plug it into a calculator like this one: sample-size.net/post-probabili…
12/ Because of this test, we have gone from an intermediate (50%) pre-test probability to an intermediate-high (73%) post-test probability of sensorineural hearing loss!
13/ In summary
- Use the 512 Hz tuning fork to do the Weber and Rinne tests
- Do the Weber before doing the Rinne
- AC is normally better than BC
- Use a history to guide your exam and then use LRs to help modify your probability of identifying pathology
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/8 First of all, a quick reminder that the utility of the FeNa and FeUrea in evaluation of AKI needs to be carefully considered before they are ordered (I'm a big fan of looking at UAs). journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/artic…
3/8 You might see a table like the one below that can be used to (cautiously) interpret FENa and FEUrea.
1/11 Congrats to those who matched! I tweeted about an inpatient pocket card set in 2020 and got great feedback. Here is the result of a big overhaul: bit.ly/pocketcardset
1/14 I was always asked as a student if I wanted to give fluids to a patient, but no one ever told me how they think about. Here is my approach to giving IV fluids.
Disclaimer: Things are simplified for the sake of pragmatism.
2/14 I call my approach an "IV fluid timeout." It involves asking yourself four questions before giving someone IV fluids.
3/14 I broke down the answer two question one into two major buckets. This is the most important question because if a patient does not need IV fluids, do not give IV fluids.