The CBI has, however, requested that hearing be deferred since it has approached Supreme Court challenging the May 21 order of High Court which has allowed the TMC leader to be placed under house arrest instead of jail.
Sr. Kalyan Bandhopadhyay for accused submits mere filing of SLP does not mean that the HC Bench which is hearing before HC should not proceed at all.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta responds.
It is unfortunate that unbecoming acts are happening in Calcutta where CM barges into CBI and other leaders intimidate central agencies. This is not rule of law: Mehta
What would happen in Supreme Court I cannot speculate.
My prayer is not that I am going today, you stay it. I never make such arrogant submissions: Mehta.
If the CBI feels that due to unprecedented events in which CM lays siege of CBI office, we feel we need to go to SC, then we might be permitted and my request is to defer till day after tomorrow: Mehta
I cannot speculate what SC will do. I think I have a right to raise the issue before Supreme Court.
If I have to persuade Your Lordships this long to defer the matter, then I would leave it to Your Lordships: Mehta
Mr. Mehta, please also take into account the fact that a cyclone is set to hit Bengal today evening at a speed of more than 100 kmh. We might not even be able to sit for next 5 to 7 days: Justice Mukerji
Dr. Singhvi says bench hearing will not prejudice anyone. Even if they are released today by HC, if SC overturns it, they will go back to jail. Where is the prejudice.
First issue is "Can Your Lordships act on request by email and on oral submissions by investigation agency when what had happened was in public glare and entire media was capturing it": Tushar Mehta
Mr. Mehta what was the prayer in the email sent to CJ: Bench
Bench points out since there was no request for stay of order in email.
Can you by filing an application under Section 407 cancel bail order? Justice Sen asks.
Acting CJ Rajesh Bindal says no order was passed by special court when HC was hearing the matter. There were some media reports only that order was passed: Justice Bindal
- Does DB have power to stay bail order under section 407?
- Under established principles of bail jurisprudence, were the accused entitled to bail and / or could the order granting bail be reversed?
- The additional effect of not hearing the accused as a facet of natural justice and fair play while reversing bail.
- Prima face for purposes of bail, is the clear absence of sanction from appropriate authority fatal to initiation itself including arrest?
- 90 percent of what is stated by way of adjectives by CBI is non existent. CBI wants to believe that we were under martial law in an East Indian state called West Bengal
Singhvi sets out the above issues which court should consider.
Will Your Lordships countenance a 407 order without an application filed under section 407?
407(3) mandatorily requires an affidavit which is absent: Dr. Singhvi
The May 19 plea was a retrospective validation of what was done orally on May 17: Dr. Singhvi
The special judge hears matter virtually on request by CBI.
There is no whisper of mention in that order about hearing being obstructed or access to court being disturbed: Dr. Singhvi
When order (by special judge) goes southwards, they are running here with oral prayers. But no whisper of it during four hours before special judge: Dr. Singhvi.
Are you saying that DB did not have benefit of seeing Special judge order? Dr. Sen
Yes. When the bulk of period when the matter was argued before DB, it did not have. It later came into DB's hands later in the day before order was passed by DB: Dr. Singhvi.
- natural justice violation
- judicial order cannot be cancelled by petition under section 407 or 226. The remedy if at all is section 439(2) or section 482
- writ is not the remedy. And no circumstances to invoke 482.
- chargesheet placed before Governor in Jan. What is the justification to arrest in May?
Advocate General Kishore Dutta asks can investigation agency seeking such petition on ground of law and order amount to undermining the independence of judiciary
Adv Dhananajay Grover mentions matter concerning #FarmersProtests : Tomorrow. May 26 will mark 6 months of farmer protests. Harvest season is over. BKU and farmer unions are coming to Delhi ...
Supreme Court vacation bench to shortly hear a plea claiming that #PostPollViolence in West Bengal has led to an exodus of people and internal displacement in the State. Seeks immediate relief for the "internally displaced" #SupremeCourt @MamataOfficial @BJP4Bengal
The plea seeks directions to Centre to discharge its duty vested under Article 355 of the Constitution of India to protect the state from internal disturbance.
Further, to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the incidents of political violence
Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan hears a plea seeking ex gratia monetary compensation of Rs. 4 lacs or notified ex gratia monetary compensation to the families of deceased who have succumbed to the #COVID19 pandemic
Justice Ashok Bhushan: Where is the letter dated April 8, 2015?
Advocate Gaurav Kumar Bhansal: in that letter it stated that all states were directed to implement this scheme
Senior Adv SB Upadhyay: we are seeking that giving effect to Section 12, a certificate needs to be issued that death is due to #covid ... there are cases where the bodies are being taken from mortuary to cremation ground. there needs to be a certificate