If he wanted friendship, he wouldn’t invade peaceful neighbours or launch terrorist attacks on foreign soil
If he cared about human rights, his regime wouldn’t be repressive
If he wanted transparency, he wouldn’t run a mafia state
If Putin wanted Ukraine to exist as a sovereign independent nation, and enjoy peaceful coexist with his neighbour, he wouldn’t be doing everything to destroy the country.
If Putin believed he couldn’t get away with it, he wouldn’t continue.
The Western world pretends Russia isn’t a rogue terrorist authoritarian mafia regime, and can be reasoned with.
One would think that after all these years of trying the same unsuccessful approach with spectacular failure, the West would try a different way.
One would think that after a failed reset, that no one would be foolish enough to try the same dangerous and unethical approach twice.
One would think we would see that Putin has grown more confident he can get away with ever increasingly criminality under the current approach.
One would think we would prize stability, peace, territorial integrity, sovereignty of nations, democracy, freedom, life, the rule of law, and so on enough to try to secure and protect them, rather than destroy and degrade them.
One would think that there would be ONE - just ONE - leader of a powerful western democratic country that would have enough integrity to pursue Justice and peace.
We KNOW that with Putin, the mere absence of war does not mean peace. It does not mean Justice. It does not mean respect for democracy or the rule of law. It will not be a success if Putin is agreeable to terms of “peace”.
Whatever Putin is willing to accept is calculated. Moscow will not make any “concessions” it will not accept without a smile.
Unless Russia is coerced through the power of law and moral authority, we will not see any palatable change, even if it brings so called “peace”.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why is @bellingcat helping Moscow & Minsk pursue the narrative that the captured Belarusian dissident Roman Protasevich is a neo-Nazi?
EVEN IF HE IS - which everyone who knows him says he absolutely is not - THIS IS NOT THE STORY. Only Putin & Lukashenko want you to think it is.
Russia and Belarus (let’s not kid ourselves that Belarus did this on its one) hijacked a plane to kidnap and jail a journo critical of the evil Lukashenko regime. They want to distract from the air piracy and detention of a dissident who may very likely be killed by the state.
THAT is the story. Two evil, rogue, terrorist, authoritarian regimes manufacture cause to detain and then torture and kill those who dare to utter a critical word. Not that who they detained could be anything the regimes claim about him to distract from their criminality.
It is seriously messed up that two hours a day is considered “limited” screen time for a toddler or child. That is an incredibly long period of time per day in a two year old’s life, and even in the day of a six year old.
We have allowed ourselves to be conned that there is “good” programming that is “educational” and so “valuable” learning tools for a child. As if we cannot teach children their ABC’s and 1,2,3’s without screens.
It reminds me a little of the “must” food that is a staple in many a home with infants and young children - puffed o’s like Cheerios. An “essential” for infants to develop their pincer grasp. How oh how did babies EVER learn to pick anything up before Cheerios?
People need to be reminded that Putin CHOSE the path of confrontation and of aggression. Putin CHOSE to shatter peace. He CHOSE to sow chaos. He CHOSE to rule a mafia state as an authoritarian. He CHOSE this path totally unprovoked.
After the collapse of the USSR, the West rolled out the red carpet to Moscow. There was no Nuremberg equivalent for Moscow’s multiple genocides. Russia was included in intl orgs which it had no business being in as it hadn’t met the requirements. And western money showered RU.
Putin had NO legitimate cause whatsoever to CHOOSE the path of aggression and confrontation. He chose it because he wanted absolute power, money, control, and status on the world stage. To date, we can see Russia doesn’t have the patience - or ambition - to evolve to that point.
I think most Ukrainians do not realize just how much the Soviets stripped and destroyed of Ukrainian language, culture, and tradition. Generations were Sovietized to such an extent that much was lost, especially in larger cities.
Many (not all) Ukrainians simply are unaware of how old, extensive, & rich UA culture is. The Soviets did such a good job of breeding a sense of inferiority that even what has remained is often not sufficiently valued, & eagerly cast off for “superior” Western commercial culture.
Many Asian cultures are prized, and admired by outsiders. If more Ukrainians only knew how incredible and interesting many aspects of their tradition and culture are, they would cherish them more, do everything to boost, preserve, and protect all of it.
Oh, no, no. The President of #Ukraine is surely wrong, and all those journalists who know shit about Ukraine, the international organizations that are too compromised or cowardly to speak the truth because it demands action, etc. know better. 🙄 mil.gov.ua/en/news/2018/0…
In all seriousness, just think about how profoundly twisted this is. #Ukraine has stated unambiguously that #Russia is waging an unlawful interstate war on Ukraine, and NOT ONE body of political note or power will even acknowledge this basic truth!
This is precisely why @RomanSohn and I demand that the EU & NATO *finally* lead & call things by their names, and clearly and unambiguously recognize the patently obvious truth, that #Russia is the aggressor in an unlawful, interstate war against #Ukraine. atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainea…