Apart from seeking transfer, I am invoking Court's jurisdiction under Art 226 of Constitution and Section 482 CrPC that entire proceedings before special court are vitiated and non est: Tushar Mehta
Today we are seeing political leaders indulging in orchestrated attempts. If this mobocracy is not checked by Constitutional courts of the country, then trmw if a gangster is arrested, his supporters will also gherao of CBI office: Tushar Mehta
My submissions should not be seen as casting aspersions on special judge who granted bail. The issue is that proceedings should not be perceived as not inspiring public confidence: Tushar Mehta
In this regard, the confidence of common man has to be the benchmark to be considered while ascertaining the public confidence in system: Tushar Mehta
Mr. Mehta, you say you don't have exception to the judge' s order.
Unless you can show that alleged mobocracy had any effect on the judge, how can you invoke Art 226: Calcutta High Court
The question is not whether the judge was under intimidation or not. The question is whether the perceived intimidation could shake the common man's faith in the system: SG Tushar Mehta
I ask Your Lordships to please forget the issue of legality of arrest for the time being. The question now is can they seek bail by such conduct: SG Tushar Mehta
Tomorrow this could happen in some other State. Tmrw if a gangster is arrested or a leader of a community is arrested, people can gather and intimidate investigation agency: SG Tushar Mehta
Court says there are many such sensitive issues in India which can lead to public outrage.
Common man might go with sentiments. Rule of law is paramount. I don't think judge who wrote order of bail...the other issues are different. I don't think perception of common will avert dispensation of justice: Justice Harish Tandon
This incident of ministers barging into court and CBI office for supporting accused has replaced Constitutional rule of law: SG Tushar Mehta
Justice Arijit Banerjee asks whether these issues should be considered at all for grant of bail.
Your Lordships need not be sitting in 5- judge combination to decide bail. This bench is deciding more significant issue of whether the proceedings before the CBI court was vitiated.
Justice Mukerji says 5- judge bench is considering all issues including bail aspect.
SG Mehta clarifies that he is not saying that.
Please don't misunderstand me. What I am saying is the bail aspect should not cloud the larger issue I am raising: SG Tushar Mehta
Your Lordships are nor entitled to transfer and even if Your Lordships are so entitled, bail order cannot be stayed without hearing accused: Dr. Singhvi
Mr. Mehta's opening submissions makes it clear that he wants the Court to go into everything except bail: Dr. Singhvi
Justice IP Mukerji says if bail is granted today it would virtually amount to dismissal of this case. So it is not a simple issue, says Justice Banerji.
Dr. Singhvi says even if bail is granted and later court decides in favour of CBI on mobocracy issue then they can be put back in jail.
If adjectives could win the case, then my learned friend has already won the case: Dr. Singhvi on SG Tushar Mehta's arguments saying he has 8 adjectives used by SG
I could not even make such a list on him (Dr. Singhvi) because it is more than 100: SG Tushar Mehta
Discussion now on modality of filing judgment compilation. Acting CJ says judgments shared by SG on google drive could not be accessed.
SG says ASG will share physical copies
Order: At the commencement of the hearing, SG Tushar Mehta made request for impleadment of State of West Bengal as respondent 9 in the petition filed by CBI.
The request is accepted. State of WB is impressed is R. 9.
Advocate General Kishore Dutta accepts notice on behalf of State of WB.
It further transpired that advance copies were not serves on respondents ,5 to 8 in the petition.
Let copies of petition be served on them.
It was submitted by counsel for respondents 1 to 4 that since question of liberty is involved, let their application for recall of May 17 order be heard first before hearing larger issues raised by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta
We accept the same. Let arguements on recall application be heard first.
Pithani was arrested under S 8(c) r/w 20(b)(II)(a),27,28 & 29 r/w 27-A & 35. He was produced before Court in Hyderabad for transit warrant after which he has be brought to Mumbai.
CJI NV Ramana: This judgment is regarding the frequent orders passed particularly by the UP courts relating to grant of anticipatory bail.
CJI Ramana: Here we have two cases where the Allahabad high court while dismissing the plea on merits granted 90 days time as protection. This was examined by us #SupremeCourt
CJI: question before us was whether the high court while dismissing the anticipatory bail applications of the respondents has granted them protection from arrest.
Court will hear today the recall application filed by the 4 leaders seeking recall of May 17 HC order by which the bail granted to the 4 leaders by special CBI court was stayed by HC.
Calcutta High Court to hear petition seeking probe into post poll violence that rocked West Bengal after the announcement of 2021 Assembly elections results.
Transfer petition in question under S 407 CRPC was taken up by a Division Bench of #CalcuttaHighCourt on May 17 based on an email sent by CBI to the Court and a mentioning by ASG YJ Dastoor