In a new study led by the group of Hui-Ling Yen, we help define the transmission potential of flu viruses replicating in the upper and lower respiratory tract, and quantify the rate of mixing between viruses in these two locations: academic.oup.com/jid/advance-ar… (1/n)
Specifically, our results show that at least in ferrets, viruses transmit from the upper rather than lower respiratory tract, and there is only limited slow mixing between viral populations in these two anatomical locations. (2/n)
Specifically, we generated pdmH1N1 viruses that were either "wildtype" or had 2 synonymous mutations that served as neutral genetic markers. Ferrets were then inoculated with one of these viral variants in the upper airway, and one in the lower airway. (3/n)
Even after several days, these variants remained confined mostly to the location at which they were inoculated, indicating fairly slow migration of viruses between the upper and lower airways. (4/n)
Furthermore, recipient ferrets that were co-housed with the inoculated ferrets were infected exclusively by the viral variant in the upper airways, indicating transmission occurs predominantly from viruses in the upper and not the lower respiratory tract. (5/n)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bloom Lab

Bloom Lab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbloom_lab

13 May
In letter published in @ScienceMagazine today, I join 17 other scientists in calling for further investigation of #SARSCoV2 origins, including objective consideration of both accidental lab leak and natural zoonosis: science.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.… (1/n)
We note the scientific community has made admirable progress in understanding biology of #SARSCoV2, including developing vaccines & other countermeasures. But more investigation needed to determine origin of pandemic, which is critical to mitigating risk of future outbreaks (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
23 Apr
We've written a perspective on a new study by @MAMdayIndayOut that helps explain why some viruses (measles) don't evolve to escape immunity but others (influenza) do. Provides some clues relevant to future for #SARSCoV2 as well: cell.com/cell-reports-m…

Here is a recap: (1/n)
Measles and influenza are both respiratory RNA viruses with high mutation rates. Immunity to measles is lifelong: before vaccines, people were infected just once in their lives. Then a measles vaccine was developed >50 years ago and it still works great today. (2/n)
Unfortunately, same is not true for influenza. Typical person is re-infected with same subtype of influenza every 5-7 yrs. Importantly, influenza re-infections are *not* because immunity is weak or transient. We know this from the 1977 flu pandemic. (3/n)
Read 20 tweets
14 Apr
In new study, we compared specificity of #SARSCoV2 antibody response elicited by Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine vs infection. Some interesting differences: vaccine neut activity more RBD targeted, but has broader binding within RBD: biorxiv.org/content/10.110… (1/n)
First @AllieGreaney & Andrea Loes quantified how important RBD-binding antibodies were for neutralization by mRNA-vaccine- and infection-elicited sera. Vaccine sera neutralization was highly RBD directed: >90% of neut by nearly all vaccine sera due to RBD-binding antibodies (2/n) Image
This result is interesting, as mRNA-1273 encodes entire spike ectodomain with stabilizing 2P mutations. But either those mutations or differences in antigen presentation by mRNA vaccine vs viral infection cause vaccine neut antibodies to focus more heavily on RBD. (3/n)
Read 14 tweets
31 Mar
We've created an interactive website to visualize >100,000 experimental measurements of how mutations to #SARSCoV2 RBD affect binding by antibodies & sera: jbloomlab.github.io/SARS2_RBD_Ab_e… Explore it to examine a wealth of information about the antigenic effects of viral mutations. (1/n)
Over the last 9 months, the indefatigable @tylernstarr & @AllieGreaney have used deep mutational scanning to measure how the 2,304 RBD mutations tolerated for protein folding / ACE2 binding affect recognition by 50 antibodies / sera. Data scattered across multiple papers. (2/n)
We have consolidated these data so they can be explored to understand antigenic impacts of mutations observed during genomic surveillance. Best way to look at data is to explore the website at jbloomlab.github.io/SARS2_RBD_Ab_e…, but here are some static-image summaries: (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
18 Mar
In new work led by @AllieGreaney, we analyze mutational escape of #SARSCoV2 from monoclonal & polyclonal antibodies in terms of RBD epitope classes (biorxiv.org/content/10.110…). Provides useful framework for conceptualizing effects of individual and combined mutations. (1/n)
Specifically, @cobarnes27 @bjorkmanlab classified potent neutralizing anti-RBD antibodies in 3 classes using structural analyses (nature.com/articles/s4158…). These classes (1, 2, 3) shown below (also 4th class of less potent antibodies that bind further from ACE2 interface). (2/n)
@AllieGreaney used deep mutational scanning to map all mutations that escape binding to yeast-displayed RBD by antibodies of each class (from @NussenzweigL). Below are escape maps. Escape mutations usually at antibody contact sites, but not all contact site mutations escape (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
18 Mar
I agree w @Ayjchan’s analysis of @undarkmag article (undark.org/2021/03/17/lab…) by @schmidtwriting on #SARSCoV2 origins, which has thoughtful comments by experts like @ras_nielsen & David Relman. We need objective discussion of possibilities, including accidental lab leak. (1/9)
There are divergent opinions, as always for scientific questions w little evidence. But that’s point: there’s incomplete evidence either way. So like @mbeisen (), I’m astonished about certainty professed given current evidence. (2/9)
Central to being a good scientist is keeping an open mind when evidence is sparse, and as a “virus expert” who has followed this topic closely: it’s clear in any objective assessment that both natural origins and accidental lab leak are plausible. (3/9)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(