Delhi High Court hearing Rajiv Luthra's appeal against Single Judge order reinstating Mohit Saraf to L&L partnership

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Judges and counsel discussing travel plans during court vacation. Too risky to travel, they conclude.

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi for Luthra: Unfortunately some things are not working out. I will spend a few minutes on the settlement

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
It is so near, but yet so far. The figure was Rs. 50 crore + Rs. 28 crore. Even assuming that we are willing to pay 70 crore, the money required to run the firm will be wiped out. The firm cannot run on fresh air: Singhvi

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
He can get Rs. 5000 crore if he wins the arbitration, these are undecided issues. We offered over Rs. 50 crore as interim payment and a bank guarantee to cover the balance. If it fails, it fails: Singhvi

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Are you willing to give Rs 100 crore for him to leave? That is a test of valuation. Justice Endlaw turns the question on counsel for Saraf

Raghvendra Singh, appearing for Saraf, says this is exactly what he offered to Luthra in October 2020.

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Only if you are willing to pay him the same amount can a settlement be reached. You should either agree to received 1/3 or give 2/3: Justice Endlaw

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
You have to pay him 1/3 of what you put the valuation at: Justice Endlaw to Singhvi

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
There has been great reduction of cost to bring the firm's war chest to around Rs. 69 crore: Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra for Rajiv Luthra

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Last we spoke, it had gone up to 55 crore. Now, it is 52 crore plus 25 crore bank guarantee. This seems acceptable: Raghvendra Singh.

Advocate Haripriya Padmanabhan confirming with Rajiv Luthra whether the settlement in acceptable.

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Singhvi gives suggestions on order:

Bank guarantee will be subject to outcome of arbitration.

All monies paid will be adjustable according to the award.

Lawyers are free to join whichever Partner they choose

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
There is no pressing of claim for reinstatement, as Raghvendra Singh agreed yesterday: Singhvi

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Rajiv Luthra leaves it to Singhvi and the Bench, if they think it is right

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
On name of Saraf's potential new firm, lawyers say that it cannot have Luthra name.

"If you use the Luthra name, I will sue you!" Sidharth Luthra says

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
No hardware can be taken from the firm, Justice Endlaw says. Only data of whichever person who is moving to join Saraf can be taken.

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Singh asks for email ids of lawyers to be retained.

Justice Endlaw disagrees: You have to inform all your clients. You will have to market all over again.

Court is agreeable to luthra ids of these lawyers to be terminated.

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Singh: L&L Partners does transactional and litigation work. First is through Mumbai and Delhi firms, there is no difference between the two.

Are you stepping out of all firms? Justice Sanjeev Narula asks

What will happen to litigation firm? Justice Endlaw
We have started a mediation with the litigation to find a solution: Singh

There needs to be a clean break from all L&L firms: Sidharth Luthra says

Do you have consent from all other Partners? Court asks

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Sidharth Luthra: New firm should not have any semblance of Luthra name. Data of firm cannot be carried.

Data pertaining to his clients will have to go: Court

That is not a difficulty: Luthra

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
It has to be an honourable clean break. Let the arbitrator decide what amounts go to what party. They have to agree to move on: Luthra

What is honourable to you may not be honourable to him, you cannot ask for that: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Rajiv Luthra says that he can make the payment within 24 hours. Data of clients going with Saraf will be shared. Saraf can take credit for work that he has done, not what the firm has done.
It is difficult to draw lines like that. When you are Partners, everything you do is attributable to the firm: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Please tell us by when Saraf will leave: Luthra asks Singh

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Court begins dictating order

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Rajiv Luthra shall before Saturday, pay to Mohit Saraf a sum of Rs 52 crore and furnish an unconditional, irrevocable bank guarantee of a sum of Rs 25 crore encashable in terms of the award of the arbitral tribunal adjudicating disputes between the parties: Court

#DelhiHighCourt
Mohit Saraf shall cede any right to reinstatement to L&L firms: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Payments in terms of profits of firm etc due to Saraf to be subject to outcome of arbitral proceedings: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Saraf shall be entitled to set up his own independent legal practice either alone or in partnership with anyone else. He shall be entitled to describe himself as a former Partner of L&L, but name of new practice shall not have Luthra or L&L as part thereof: Court
#DelhiHighCourt
Luthra and Saraf will be allowed to compete for clients, advocates and staff of L&L Mumbai and Delhi: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Whichsoever clients of L&L Mumbai and Delhi decides to move to the legal practice of Saraf, shall be entitled to do so. L&L shall shift the data related to those clients to new firm and will not retain any of this data: Court
New emails ids for those who join Saraf. Clients will be informed of these email ids. Electronic identity of Saraf as L&L Partner shall be blocked on receipt of payment: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Parties are in talks with respect to split of litigation firm. That will be separate: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Draft order will be circulated to counsel. Final order will be passed tomorrow: Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
Entire profession is thankful to you for telling us how to bill! Justice Endlaw to Singhvi on a lighter note

Like Mark Twain said of his death, reports of this are greatly exaggerated: Singhvi

Matter ends.

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
[Breaking] Rajiv Luthra to pay Mohit Saraf Rs 52 crore and a bank guarantee of Rs 25 crore as an interim settlement: Delhi High Court

#DelhiHighCourt #LuthravSaraf
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

3 Jun
Bench led by Chief Justice Dipankar Datta of #BombayHighCourt is hearing the petition assailing the decision of boards to cancel Class 10 examinations.

#boardexams2021

@CMOMaharashtra Image
Advocate General Anil Kumbhakoni informs the Court about the hearing in Supreme Court.

AG: It was informed to the Court that Class 12 exams are cancelled. They gave 2 weeks time to come up with evaluation criteria after cancelled exam.

#boardexams2021 #BombayHighCourt
AG: From the live reporting we note that the Court was happy with the decision like last year.

#boardexams2021 #BombayHighCourt
Read 10 tweets
3 Jun
Calcutta High Court 5-judge Bench to resume hearing in CBI transfer plea in Narada matter

#NaradaScam #CalcuttaHighCourt #MamataBanerjee

@AITCofficial @MamataOfficial Image
Read an exchange between lawyers hearing from yesterday's hearing

#NaradaScam #CalcuttaHighCourt

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Bench assembles; hearing commences.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta resumes arguments.

He says he will conclude his arguments today

#WestBengal #CalcuttaHighCourt
Read 22 tweets
3 Jun
#BombayHighCourt is hearing Suo Motu plea concerning #COVID19 situation in districts falling within the Aurangabad Bench jurisdiction.

Bench of Justices RV Ghuge and BU Debadwar are dealing with the issue of #mucormycosis. Image
Court is informed that till today in Aurangabad there have been 49 deaths, and in Nanded 35 deaths.
In Marathwada region, 124 deaths have taken place till date.

#COVID19 #BombayHighCourt
Court: And what is the stock of the #AmphotericinB with us?
Because the affidavit in the Principal seat says about 5-6 vials are required in a day, and we were told yesterday that only 1-2 vials in a day. SO what is it? Undertreatment?

#COVID #BombayHighCourt
Read 47 tweets
3 Jun
Delhi High Court will today hear plea by Delhi Medical Association against Baba Ramdev.

Plea seeks to restrain Ramdev from disseminating false information on Coronil.

Hearing before Justice C Hari Shankar.

#DelhiMedicalAssociation #BabaRamdev

@PypAyurved Image
Bench has assembled.

#BabaRamdev
Is this a section 91 suit? You can't be canvasing anything of public interest here. You say OMG Ramdev has said something.. you people should be spending time of finding cure for the pandemic instead of wasting court time : Court

#BabaRamdev
Read 80 tweets
3 Jun
Delhi High Court will today continue hearing petitions concerning #COVID19 issues in the national capital.

Hearing to take place before Justices Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh.

#DelhiCovid #COVID19India

@CMODelhi @LtGovDelhi Image
Nandita Rao for Drug Controller is arguing.

2,349 Strips of Fabi Flu was purchased by Gautam Gambhir foundation.

#DelhiCovid #COVID19India @CMODelhi @LtGovDelhi @GautamGambhir
Drug Controller had issued notice on whether the premises where these drugs were distributed had permission for drug license.

#DelhiCovid #COVID19India @CMODelhi @LtGovDelhi @GautamGambhir
Read 20 tweets
3 Jun
#SupremeCourt to deliver judgment on a plea by a minor challenging the constitutional validity of Bye-law 69 (CBSE Bye-laws) since it prohibits correction in student or parent's name in school certificate unless such correction matches with the school records
@cbseindia29 Image
The plea was a challenge to the Delhi High Court judgment of 2010 whereby the HC had noted that:

"Court should be extremely reluctant to substitute its own views as to what is wise, prudent and proper in relation to academic matters"

#DelhiHighCourt
#SupremeCourt
Justice Khanwilkar: we have restored all these cases with directions to CBSE in paragraphs as laid down in the judgment.

#SupremeCourt
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(