Is this a section 91 suit? You can't be canvasing anything of public interest here. You say OMG Ramdev has said something.. you people should be spending time of finding cure for the pandemic instead of wasting court time : Court
This is a suit for civil rights of doctors: Adv Rajiv Dutta
Every suit has to be relatable to some provision in CPC. He is making statements that allopathy is useless.. your suit is thoroughly confusing.. some sense was that there were certain statements by Ramdev .. : Court
.. and those statements would be detrimental to public : Court
The institution of medical science.. : Dutta
We are in CPC not 226. You establish locus : Court
Also. It is affecting the members of the plaintiff.. the statements made in open affect.. he's calling doctors names. He's saying this science is fake. In a pandemic.. : Dutta
If I feel some science is fake.. tomorrow I feel homeopathy is fake.. do you mean they will file a suit against me? I put it on Twitter.. you'll say take down Twitter account? It is public opinion: Court
Problem with URL is that it is an internet link. Tomorrow is that is taken off, the link is useless. So you can't file URLs. They are temporary. You have to file a clip : Court
We will do that. This is something of grave importance : Dutta
Let's assume what he has said is wrong, misleading, mischievous.. therefore I understand it is a statement affecting the general public. There is a provision under CPC; Court
Suit under Public interest can't be filed except under section 95 cpc : Court
But I say that. In my plea the ultimate sufferer patients. He is hitting at doctors. It is affecting health of nation: Dutta
This is not a PIL. If you want, you could have filed a PIL: Court #Randev
Court says in a civil suit, locus has to be established.
Adv Ankur Mahindro asks court to see the object for this DMA was established.
Treatment in hospitals.. ICMR has declared which medicine is to be prescribed.. it is the nodal agency of the government. I want to show futher. He says answering the Ministry.. changes his claim straight away : Dutta
Is he to be blamed for people buying Coronil? : Court
He has a vast following in the country : Dutta
So are holding a brief for the vast uneducated millions of the country who are in trap of D1? : Court
So what about the doctors : Dutta
Who is stopping you? : Court
He says don't take the vaccine.. it is only vaccinate, vaccinate: Dutta
This appears to be a PIL masquerading as a suit. You file a PIL... Initially he said it is cure..he then said no no it is not a cure. In the meanwhile, millions bought it : Court
Now all this is coming down to that public has been mislead. There is a provision is CPC. Either you file application under Sec 91 or file a PIL : Court
I'll show something that is directly hitting the doctors: Dutta
We have restrains under CPC. We can't be as expansive: Court
Dutta asks the court to see another statement made by Ramdev to media.
Where is teb original statement? On what platform? Press or Twitter? : Court
Entire media: Dutta
This is transcript as reported in news. Where is the original: Court
He's saying lakhs of people who have died are because of allopathic medicines given by doctors.. he says we are stupid. It is an insolvent science.. at this juncture? We're curing lakhs of people. We are calling warriors today. 600 have died : Dutta
These are not defamatory alone. This is serious.. we are saying it is directly hitting the associations, the aims of associations. We together are being insulted: Dutta
It is an opinion. We are talking about.. you must ina case like this.. any case founded on prayer for blocking statements has to be tested on anvil of art 19(1)(a).. there is a right.. terminology may be offensive..: Court
Ramdev is a person..he doesn't have faith is allopathic. He believes everything can be cured by Yoga and ayurved. He may be right or wrong: Court
This court can't say Coronil is a cure or not.. it is matter which needs expert viewing which requires Medical experts. There is a lot of deal of scrutiny.. this suit can't be a means to supplement what govt is doing : Court
Let's say 10k people buy Coronil.. let us say 9.5k died.. they thought Coronil will work. You go to press and say look Coronil has killed 95%. Are you saying Ramdev will file a suit against you? Allopathic has worked for some and not worked for us . Someone has a view : Court
That it is because of inefficacy of allopathic so many people have died..I think it comes within Art 19(1)(a) : Court
He is a very powerful man : Dutta
I'm least concerned.. : Court
We made criminal complaints. He says nobody's father can arrest me: Dutta
Ministry does not say so. It has not giving any finding.. So far as I know, to give a declaration.. it is an extremely involved process. It will require extensive study and research: Court
Dutta seeks that there is no republication of the content.
I submit that the court may save us from this onslaught. The entire work.. they are being called names. Confusion is being caused. 70% are poor. Now he is saying don't vaccinate: Dutta
Entire framework is on Section 91.. it is their own case is that it is intended for public good.. I'm raising preliminary objection of maintainability : Nayar
That's not the point. Point was if you see 91(1), it has two parts. In case of public nuisance or other wrongful act, a suit for injunction etc may be instituted.. prayer in suit adn arguments.. are entirely arguments for affecting injury to public : Court
Pleadings in plaint and arguments are premised on fact that Ramdev's act are prejudicial to the public.. especially in the matter of seeking relief from COVID 19. De hors the merit of the case, it appears prima facie that the averments.. would attract section 91(1) CPC : Court
Mr Rajiv Nayar for D1 raised a preliminary objection to the maintainability of the suit.. this, in fact, appears to be mandatory (as held by Court).. two responses have been offered. First is that sec 91(1) may not ve infracted as token damage of Rs 1 has veen claimed : Court
Second that act of D1 also injure the plaintiff itself. Prima facie, I am not convinced that these can be accepted at face value.. bare reading of sec 91 shows that if suit alleges public nuisance or wrongful act, suit has to be instituted by AG or with the leave of court : Court
This discipline has not been followed in the suit : Court
The suit is a composite suit. Argument were advanced in composite manner. In any event, if suit is restricted to injury caused to plaintiff, it would require amendment to the plaint : Court
This is at the highest an arguable point. It mainly set out the objectives.. these relate to aspect of public interest and public health...it may well fall for consideration whether 91(1) is attracted, says Court
Considerable time has passed since passing of allegedly injurious statements.. Mr Dutta says D1 continues to make statement.. no injunctive order can be given without giving opportunity to the plaint, especially in view of the objections..issue summons: Court
Dutta seeks date during the vacation.
22 May I retracted all statement: Nayar
Then tell you client to not make any statements : Court.
Nayar asks court to not make it part of order. Press is there : Nayar
I've no objection to him making statements on Coronil.. : Court
Mr Nayar is a very respectable senior. I'm sure his client will listen to him. : Court
Summons issued to unnamed defendants as well.
Response within three weeks: Court
It would be advisable that response are not restricted to maintainability : Court
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by a Uttarakhand undertrial stating that undertrials cannot be equated with convicts for the purpose of grant of parole to prevent over-crowding in jails amid the COVID-19 pandemic
Justice BR Gavai led bench of the #SupremeCourt to hear a plea challenging Rajasthan High Court’s order dismissing the plea of self-styled godman and life convict Asaram Bapu seeking temporary suspension of sentences to pursue medical treatment #AsaramBapu
Lawyer requests for a passover since Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra is appearing in another court
During the last hearing, the court had ordered the formation of a three-member committee to ensure that persons displaced by post poll violence in West Bengal are able to return to their houses.
The Committee is expected to submit a report to the Court on the status of those who are desirous of returning to their houses but have faced troubles from their locality.
Delhi High Court to shortly pronounce judgment in plea seeking de-registration of Andhra Pradesh CM YS Jaganmohan Reddy's Yuvajana Sramika Rythu (YSR) Congress Party.
The petitioner claimed that despite the Election Commission barring it from adopting “YSR Congress Party” as its party name, the party was illegally and unlawfully using the name on its letterheads, campaign material, etc.
Chawla along with Veeresh Malik and Teena Vachani had filed the suit before the High Court, arguing that until and unless 5G technology is "certified safe", its roll out should not be permitted.
While reserving judgement on whether the suit can be instituted, the Delhi High Court said that Chawla's plea was defective and was filed for media publicity.